Codify — Article

Supply and Appropriation (Main Estimates) Act 2025 authorises government spending for 2025–26

Annual appropriation Act converts the Main Estimates into legal authority, sets how departmental receipts may be reused and gives the Treasury direction powers over contraventions.

The Brief

The Supply and Appropriation (Main Estimates) Act 2025 is the statutory vehicle that converts the government's Main Estimates into legal authority to use resources and to issue money from the Consolidated Fund for the 2025–26 financial year. It appropriates the amounts listed in the Schedule against departmental Departmental Expenditure Limits (DEL), Annually Managed Expenditure (AME) and Non‑Budget Expenditure (NBE), and sets rules for how cash and resource permissions are applied.

Beyond raw totals, the Act clarifies how income arising to departments may be appropriated for use, requires most receipts to be paid into the Consolidated Fund unless a specific authority exists, and gives the Treasury power to issue rules and remedial directions where appropriation rules are breached. The Act also treats the appropriations as effective from the start of the financial year, putting routine fiscal authorisation and some Treasury controls in place for departments, arm’s‑length bodies and other public bodies for 2025–26.

At a Glance

What It Does

The Act authorises government departments and listed public bodies to use resources and to have sums issued from the Consolidated Fund for the year ending 31 March 2026, and appropriates the scheduled Estimates into legal spending authority under DEL, AME and NBE labels. It also governs the appropriation and alternative uses of departmental income by reference to Treasury rules laid before the House of Commons and empowers the Treasury to direct corrective action for contraventions.

Who It Affects

All central government departments named in the Schedule (and their arm’s‑length bodies), accounting officers responsible for departmental finances, suppliers and grant recipients who rely on departmental budgets, and the Treasury as cash manager. Devolved administrations and other bodies receiving payments specified in Estimates are affected where the Schedule identifies such transactions.

Why It Matters

This Act is the primary legal authority that permits public spending in 2025–26: without it departmental plans in the Main Estimates would lack statutory force. It also sets the boundary between Parliament's appropriation decisions (through the Estimates) and Treasury control over the use of departmental receipts and surplus appropriation — a routine but legally significant piece of fiscal housekeeping that frames accountability and cash management for the year.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The Act works in a familiar, technical way: Parliament approves detailed Main Estimates, and this Act converts those figures into statutory authority so departments and other public bodies can lawfully spend in 2025–26. It does that by (a) authorising the use of resources, (b) authorising the issue of money from the Consolidated Fund, and (c) appropriating the amounts set out in the Schedule to the Act to particular expenditure classifications (DEL, AME, NBE).

That appropriation tells departments what they may treat as legally available for current and capital purposes.

A key operational feature is the treatment of departmental income. The Act requires that most receipts be paid into the Consolidated Fund unless another enactment or this Act authorises a different use.

It allows income identified in the Estimates to be appropriated back for departmental use, but only in accordance with Treasury rules that must have been issued and laid before the House of Commons. Where an Estimate identifies an 'estimated surplus', the Treasury may permit appropriations that are consistent with a financial plan to produce that surplus or may give a direction to anticipate a later Act that will reduce the surplus.The Treasury retains targeted supervisory powers.

If it considers a department has contravened the rules on receipts and appropriation it may give directions to the person responsible to rectify the situation and may later vary or revoke those directions. The Act also says that the sections that appropriate resources, money and income operate from the beginning of the financial year, so authorised spending is treated as effective from 1 April 2025.Practical work for departments is chiefly in reconciliation and compliance: ensuring that the figures and labels in their Main Estimates line up with how resources and cash are to be treated legally, that receipts are either surrendered to the Consolidated Fund or appropriated under Treasury rules, and that accounting officers can respond to any Treasury directions regarding misuse or mis‑labelling of receipts.

The Schedule embeds the detail: departmental DELs, AME items (often benefits, pension obligations and similar volatile items) and specific non‑budget payments are all listed so the legal authority matches the published Estimates.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

Section 1 increases the authorisation for the use of resources for 2025–26 by £607,769,235,000 (split between current and capital uses as identified in the Schedule).

2

Section 2 increases the Treasury’s authorisation to issue money out of the Consolidated Fund for 2025–26 by £486,936,719,000.

3

The Act appropriates two aggregate amounts for the year: resources totalling £1,102,340,387,000 and cash (money issued) totalling £896,774,056,000, as set out in the Schedule.

4

Section 5 requires amounts received by departments to be paid into the Consolidated Fund unless an appropriation or other enactment permits otherwise, and permits appropriation of income only where it complies with Treasury rules laid before the House of Commons.

5

Section 6 treats the appropriations and provisions in sections 3 to 5 as having effect from the start of the 2025–26 financial year, and section 5(6) gives the Treasury power to direct remedial action where it determines a contravention has occurred.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 1

Authorises resource use for 2025–26

Section 1 is the domestic authorisation for departments to use resources during the year. It fixes the ceiling for resource use and divides that ceiling into amounts authorised for current purposes and capital purposes. Practically, departments use this statutory limit to operate their budgets: any expenditure falling within their Estimate and identified against the relevant DEL/AME/NBE classification is treated as falling within the authority created by this section and the Schedule.

Section 2

Authorises issue of money from the Consolidated Fund

Section 2 increases the Treasury’s authority to issue cash from the Consolidated Fund and to apply it for expenditure authorised by Parliament. That step is legally separate from resource authorisation — it enables actual payments to flow from the public purse. Cash limits and timing matter for Treasury cash management, and the section underpins departmental net cash requirements set out in the Schedule.

Section 3

Appropriates resources to DEL, AME and NBE

Section 3 makes the appropriation of resource amounts set out in each Scheduled Estimate. It distinguishes three appropriation routes: amounts identified as subject to a Departmental Expenditure Limit (DEL), amounts identified as Annually Managed Expenditure (AME), and amounts identified as Non‑Budget Expenditure (NBE). The practical implication is legal alignment between the way Parliament scrutinised an Estimate and the statutory authority departments rely on to incur or charge those resource items.

4 more sections
Section 4

Appropriates cash (money) for specified purposes

Section 4 appropriates the cash amounts listed in the Scheduled Estimates and ties them to either the use of resources for which Parliament has authorised expenditure, or to other specified purposes listed in the Estimates. In effect, it converts departmental net cash requirements into legal permission for the Treasury to provide funds for those uses — the operational trigger for payments to suppliers, staff and transfer recipients.

Section 5

Controls on departmental income and Treasury rules

Section 5 changes how departments may retain and apply receipts: it disapplies the normal statutory limits on appropriations in aid under certain provisions and replaces them with rules set out in this section and in Treasury guidance laid before the Commons. It requires most amounts received to be paid into the Consolidated Fund unless an appropriation or other enactment permits otherwise, authorises appropriation of income only to the extent that Treasury rules allow, and sets out the special treatment where an Estimate identifies an estimated surplus. It also gives the Treasury a power to direct remedial action if it determines a contravention has occurred, a tool with real teeth for enforcing compliance.

Section 6 and 7

Effect from start of year and definitions

Section 6 deems the appropriations and other provisions to operate from 1 April 2025 so that departmental spending and cash flows for the full financial year have legal cover. Section 7 supplies definitions (eg, 'Scheduled Estimates', 'relevant DEL matter', and the reading of 'estimated surplus') that align the Act with the structure used in the Main Estimates and clarifies special readings for Parliament’s own bodies (House of Commons Administration, NAO and Parliamentary Works Grant). These interpretative rules matter operationally because they determine which items in the Schedule are DEL‑equivalent and how income/surplus labels are read.

Schedule

Detailed departmental Estimates and net cash requirements

The Schedule contains the granular material: departmental DELs, AME and NBE lines, net cash requirements and narrative descriptions of permitted purposes and income streams for each Estimate. For accounting officers and departmental finance teams the Schedule is the operative list: it shows what the department can spend on which services, whether amounts are current or capital, and how receipts have been classified. Any mismatch between operational accounting and the Schedule risks Treasury directions or the need for subsequent corrective supply legislation.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.

Explore Finance in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Central government departments and their accounting officers — they receive statutory authority to spend against the Main Estimates and legal certainty for programme delivery and supplier payments during 2025–26.
  • Arm’s‑length bodies and public service providers (NHS bodies, schools, local authorities) — appropriations and cash authorisations support continued service delivery and payment flows tied to departmental budgets in the Schedule.
  • Suppliers and contractors to government — clearer cash authorisation and appropriation of money improves payment certainty for contracts and grants referenced in the Estimates.
  • Devolved administrations and recipients of specified cross‑border services — where the Schedule lists payments to or on behalf of devolved governments, it secures legal authority for those transfers and services.

Who Bears the Cost

  • HM Treasury — increased cash and resource authorisations expand the Treasury’s cash‑management and risk exposure obligations, and it must administer and police the new rules on appropriation of income.
  • Departments and accounting officers — they face compliance costs to ensure receipts are surrendered or appropriated correctly, to justify any uses of income under Treasury rules, and to respond to Treasury directions where misapplication occurs.
  • Taxpayers and public finances — the Act legally permits higher spending for the year, and large AME items (pensions, benefits, compensation) create volatile obligations that ultimately fall to public finance risk.
  • Auditors and parliamentary scrutiny bodies (NAO, select committees) — the Act’s provisions, particularly around AME and estimated surpluses, increase the complexity of oversight and reconciliation work, imposing additional audit and transparency burden.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central dilemma is between two legitimate objectives: providing the Treasury and departments with the flexibility to manage cash and deliver public services across a complex fiscal year, and preserving Parliament’s control and transparent line‑by‑line scrutiny of public spending; mechanisms that increase executive flexibility (Treasury rules, directions, AME aggregates) solve operational problems but simultaneously compress parliamentary visibility and shift practical power toward the Treasury.

This Act performs a routine constitutional job but embeds several practical and accountability trade‑offs. First, the use of estimates and the Schedule necessarily bundles sensitive, volatile liabilities (AME) with routine DEL spending; while standard practice, large AME aggregates can reduce line‑by‑line parliamentary visibility of future liabilities and make ex‑post scrutiny harder.

Second, the Act relies on Treasury‑issued rules and directions for the appropriation of income — those rules are laid before the House of Commons but are administrative instruments; their application can shift practical control over departmental receipts from accounting officers to the Treasury, concentrating remedial power centrally.

Implementation challenges are real. Departments must reconcile operational receipts with the classifications in the Schedule, and Treasury must police compliance without unduly disrupting front‑line payments.

The special handling of 'estimated surpluses' creates room for anticipatory appropriations when the Treasury judges a plan consistent with producing a surplus or gives directions to anticipate later supply Acts — useful flexibility, but one that can blur the line between parliamentary appropriation choices and executive fiscal management. Finally, the Act’s retroactive deeming (effect from 1 April) is administratively necessary but places a premium on sound close‑of‑year accounting and swift reconciliation to avoid later rectification measures.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.