The NSF AI Education Act of 2026 directs the National Science Foundation to fund a coordinated suite of education and professional‑development activities focused on artificial intelligence and related technologies (including quantum hybrid computing). It authorizes merit‑ and need‑based undergraduate and graduate scholarships, professional fellowships, grants to land‑grant institutions for AI in agriculture, an outreach campaign, and competitive awards to expand AI tools and resources at K–16 and postsecondary institutions.
The bill also creates Community College and Vocational School Centers of AI Excellence, requires NSF to publish guidance for AI in elementary and secondary schools, tasks NIST with developing workforce frameworks (including an AI framework within a statutory timeframe), and tightens gift/partnership criteria and research‑security rules to restrict funding ties to specified foreign entities. Funding for all activities is subject to appropriation and programs must comply with federal research‑security law.
At a Glance
What It Does
Directs NSF to award scholarships (undergraduate and graduate), fellowships for educators and professionals, competitive grants for AI resources, and to designate regionally distributed community‑college Centers of AI Excellence. It also instructs NIST to develop workforce frameworks for critical technologies and requires NSF guidance on AI use in K–12.
Who It Affects
Undergraduate and graduate STEM students, community colleges, Tribal Colleges and Minority‑Serving Institutions, K–12 teachers and principals, regional workforce and industry partners, and NSF/NIST as implementing agencies. Private sector partners will be affected by new vetting rules for gifts and partnerships.
Why It Matters
Bundles education, regional capacity building, and workforce taxonomy in one statutory package—linking federal scholarship/fellowship dollars to specific priorities (rural, Tribal, MSI) while imposing research‑security and foreign‑funding restrictions that shape public‑private collaboration.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill tasks the NSF Director with creating multiple targeted funding streams to accelerate AI competence across the education pipeline and the workforce. For students, it authorizes merit‑ and need‑based undergraduate scholarships (up to four years) and graduate scholarships (up to three years) that cover tuition, fees, and a stipend and are paid directly to institutions.
Those funds may be delivered via new or existing NSF programs. Certain scholarship tracks and fellowship programs prioritize rural, Tribal, and minority‑serving institutions for AI applications in agriculture, education, and advanced manufacturing.
For practitioners and educators, the Act requires NSF to establish professional‑development fellowships to place teachers, faculty, and industry professionals into AI training programs administered by higher‑education institutions. It also authorizes competitive awards to expand AI tools and compute access at state and local education agencies, community colleges, EPSCoR and MSI institutions, and vocational schools, and it directs USDA (through NIFA) to fund land‑grant R&D and deployment of AI for agriculture.Institutional capacity building is explicit: NSF must designate at least five Community College and Vocational School Centers of AI Excellence—regionally diverse centers that disseminate best practices, scale successful programs, and identify employment pathways.
At least 20 percent of designated centers must be in EPSCoR‑eligible jurisdictions, and the centers program carries a seven‑year sunset. The bill also requires an NSF outreach campaign prioritizing underserved and rural areas and establishes grand challenges (prize competitions) aimed at training large numbers of workers—one target is how to reach 1,000,000 workers by 2030.On governance and safeguards, the Act compels NSF to establish criteria for accepting gifts and forming public‑private partnerships that bar funding from foreign countries or entities of concern and requires verification mechanisms to detect foreign ownership, control, or influence.
All activities must comply with existing federal research‑security statutes and Office of Management and Budget ethics rules for fellows assigned to federal agencies. NIST receives an expanded statutory role: it must develop, maintain, and periodically update workforce frameworks for critical and emerging technologies and publish an AI workforce framework within a defined timeframe; these frameworks should include work roles, competencies, and nontechnical support roles to help bridge education and employer needs.
Finally, section 18 prohibits NSF awards to institutions found in violation of Title VI for discrimination on the basis of shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics on or after January 1, 2020.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Undergraduate scholarships cover tuition, education‑related fees, and a stipend, are paid to institutions, and can be awarded for up to 4 years; graduate scholarships cover the same costs for up to 3 years.
NSF must designate at least 5 Community College and Vocational School Centers of AI Excellence, with not less than 20% located in EPSCoR‑eligible jurisdictions; the Centers program sunsets after 7 years.
The Director must publish criteria within 180 days to bar gifts or partnerships tied to a foreign country or foreign entity of concern and require verification against foreign ownership/control/influence.
NIST is directed to develop workforce frameworks for critical and emerging technologies and must publish an artificial intelligence workforce framework (workforce categories, roles, and competencies) within 540 days of enactment.
Section 18 makes institutions ineligible for funds under the Act if, on or after Jan 1, 2020, they have been found in violation of Title VI due to discrimination on the basis of shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Undergraduate AI and Quantum Scholarships
Authorizes NSF to award merit‑ or need‑based undergraduate scholarships for study of AI, quantum hybrid computing, and AI applications (agriculture, education, advanced manufacturing). Scholarships are annual grants covering tuition, fees, and a stipend for up to four years and are paid directly to the enrolled institution. The Director may deliver these awards through new or existing programs.
Graduate Scholarships and Priority Tracks
Creates graduate scholarship streams mirroring the undergraduate tracks (AI, quantum hybrid computing, and domain integrations). Awards are merit‑ or need‑based, cover tuition/fees/stipend, and run for up to three years. The bill requires NSF to give preference in agricultural tracks to students attending rural‑located, rural‑serving, Tribal, or minority‑serving institutions.
Professional Development and Quantum Fellowships
Directs NSF to establish fellowships for teachers, faculty, and industry professionals to obtain AI skills through institution‑administered programs (including prompt engineering and quantum hybrid computing). The statute permits placements at federal agencies and requires fellows assigned to agencies to follow OMB ethics rules. Quantum fellowships/scholarships can include temporary placements at labs, agencies, or industry and must be merit‑reviewed.
Community College and Vocational School Centers of AI Excellence
Directs NSF to select at least five geographically diverse community college or vocational‑school applicants (in partnership with industry, government, or higher‑education partners) as Centers of AI Excellence. Centers must develop/diffuse best practices, scale programs, provide hands‑on opportunities, and identify employment pathways. NSF must set metrics, require final reports on federally supported activities, produce annual reports to Congress on assessments, and the centers program terminates 7 years after enactment.
Awards for AI Resources and Nationwide Outreach
Authorizes NSF to make awards to state/local education agencies, institutions of higher education (including EPSCoR, MSI, HBCUs, TCUs, community colleges), and technical schools to expand access to AI tools and applications; prioritizes entities that broaden geographic and institutional diversity. Separately, NSF must run an outreach campaign to K–16 educators and students, prioritizing underserved and rural areas.
K–12 Guidance on Introducing AI
Requires NSF, in coordination with Education, NIST, IES, and OSTP, to develop and publish guidance on introducing and using AI in elementary and secondary education within two years. Guidance must address rural/economically distressed contexts, different applications across STEM and liberal arts, and describe consultative development with educators and private partners.
Gift Acceptance Criteria and Public‑Private Partnership Principles
Requires NSF to set criteria (within 180 days) to determine when accepting gifts or forming partnerships would compromise NSF’s integrity or fairness—including a prohibition on gifts from foreign countries or foreign entities of concern. The Director must include verification processes to detect foreign ownership, control, or influence and report the criteria/principles and any updates to Congress. NSF must also set principles to guide public‑private partnerships and review existing rules.
NIST‑led Workforce Frameworks for Emerging Technologies
Amends the NIST Act to make development, maintenance, and periodic review of workforce frameworks (competencies, workforce categories, work roles) a statutory NIST function. The Director must consult broadly, include nontechnical support roles and employability skills, produce multilingual resources, and report to Congress on updates. The statute requires an AI framework (work roles and competency areas) within 540 days and ongoing updates at least every three years.
Eligibility Restriction for Entities Found in Title VI Violations
Bars NSF awards or program participation under this Act to any education or research institution, nonprofit affiliate, or government research organization that has been found in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act due to discrimination on shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics on or after January 1, 2020.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Education across all five countries.
Explore Education in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Undergraduate and graduate STEM students—receive tuition, fees, and stipends for AI/quantum study with scholarship tracks that prioritize rural, Tribal, and minority‑serving institutions, improving access and workforce pathways.
- Community colleges and vocational schools—designated Centers of AI Excellence gain federal support, visibility, and best‑practice materials to scale AI training and link students to local employers.
- K–12 teachers and school leaders—benefit from NSF‑funded professional‑development fellowships, outreach campaigns, and research on AI teaching methods targeted at low‑income, rural, and Tribal students.
- Land‑grant institutions and agricultural stakeholders—are eligible for USDA‑NIFA grants to develop AI tools and training that address agricultural prediction, operations, and rural dissemination.
- Employers and regional economic development actors—gain a more standardized workforce taxonomy (NIST frameworks) and a pipeline of trained workers and fellows for AI and quantum roles.
Who Bears the Cost
- National Science Foundation—must administer multiple new programs, set gift‑vetting protocols, develop metrics and reporting, and coordinate interagency guidance, creating administrative overhead especially if Congress does not appropriate parallel funding.
- Institutions entering public‑private partnerships—face new verification and reporting burdens to certify absence of ties to foreign countries/entities of concern, potentially slowing collaborations or deterring smaller partners.
- Private industry partners—may face limits on how they fund programs or gifts (prohibitions and transparency requirements) and may need to undergo vetting for foreign‑ownership concerns.
- State and local education agencies and schools—must absorb guidance implementation, adopt or adapt curricular and professional development recommendations, and may need extra resources to deploy AI tools equitably in rural or underserved districts.
- Institutions found in Title VI discrimination cases—could permanently lose access to these NSF funds and related programs, with reputational and financial consequences.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma in the bill is balancing rapid expansion of AI education and regional capacity—through federal scholarships, centers, and public‑private partnerships—with strict research‑security and foreign‑funding controls that protect national interests but raise compliance costs and can slow or deter the very collaborations and institutional participation the bill seeks to scale.
Two implementation realities shape the bill’s effect. First, nearly every program is explicitly subject to appropriation; the statute authorizes channels and priorities but does not itself create guaranteed funding.
That means scale, timelines, and selection processes will depend on future appropriations decisions and internal NSF prioritization. Second, the bill layers capacity building with strict research‑security and foreign‑funding rules: NSF must vet gifts and partnerships for ties to foreign entities of concern, and programs must comply with subtitle D of the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act and relevant NDAA provisions.
Those safeguards reduce certain risks but impose compliance costs and may complicate rapid public‑private scaling, particularly for smaller institutions and community colleges.
Operationally, the bill sets several hard deadlines and numeric priorities (for example, the 540‑day AI workforce framework and minimum Center counts/percentages). Those deadlines push agencies to move quickly but also create tradeoffs: compressed timelines may favor entities with existing administrative capacity, while new or rural institutions that the bill aims to help may need more time to prepare high‑quality applications.
Finally, section 18’s eligibility bar tied to Title VI findings introduces a blunt enforcement tool; it closes off recipients after certain civil‑rights determinations, but it raises questions about proportionality, review procedures, and coordination between enforcement bodies and grant administrators.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.