This bill directs the National Science Foundation to make awards to eligible entities to develop, implement, and evaluate AI literacy programs at the local level. Funds may be used to create curricula, training, and outreach about AI basics, applications, ethics, and societal impacts, with a focus on helping marginalized communities access AI education.
It also establishes interagency reporting requirements to Congress within one year to identify how AI literacy can be advanced across workforce, commerce, education, and small business programs.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Director of the NSF may award grants to eligible entities—nonprofits, educational institutions, or consortia—to develop, implement, and evaluate local AI literacy programs. Funds may support curricula, materials, outreach, and assessment of program impact on AI understanding.
Who It Affects
Eligible grant recipients include universities, colleges, and nonprofits that collaborate with local communities; the programs target marginalized populations to expand access to AI literacy.
Why It Matters
The bill aims to close AI literacy gaps, bolster workforce readiness, and align AI education with national competitiveness and security goals by coordinating across several federal agencies.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The measure creates a federal funding stream through the National Science Foundation to support local AI literacy programs. Eligible entities—nonprofits, educational institutions, or partnerships—would receive grants to build AI curricula, materials, and resources, and to train learners, with priority given to underserved groups such as communities of color, low-income populations, rural residents, seniors, and people with disabilities.
Recipients must also evaluate program effectiveness and report back on who was served and what participants learned. In addition, the bill requires several federal agencies to prepare reports within a year outlining strategies to advance AI literacy across workforce development, small business, education, and national security, and to identify existing award programs that could be pivoted to include AI literacy.
The definitions section clarifies what counts as AI literacy and ethical AI within the program’s scope.
The Five Things You Need to Know
NSF may award grants to eligible entities to develop AI literacy programs.
Funds may be used for AI curricula, materials, and ethics education.
Priority goes to marginalized communities and underserved groups.
Recipients must submit annual NSF reports on program activities and impact.
Within a year, multiple federal agencies must report on advancing AI literacy and adapting existing awards.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
This Act may be cited as the Artificial Intelligence Literacy and Inclusion Act. The short title establishes the legislative handle for the measure and frames its policy objective around expanding AI literacy with an emphasis on inclusion.
Awards for AI Literacy Programs
The Director of the National Science Foundation may award grants to eligible entities, including nonprofits, educational institutions, or consortia, to develop, implement, and evaluate local AI literacy programs. Funds may be used to create curricula, materials, and resources on AI basics, applications, ethics, and societal impacts; to provide AI literacy education to marginalized communities with priority for underserved groups; to conduct outreach; and to evaluate program effectiveness and share lessons learned.
Interagency Coordination, Reporting, and Award Identification
Within one year after enactment, heads of specified federal agencies must submit reports detailing how AI literacy can be advanced, including opportunities to modify existing awards to include AI literacy as an eligible use of funds. Agencies must consult with educators, industry representatives, community organizations, and AI experts, and publish the reports publicly on agency websites.
Definitions
Definitions clarify AI and AI literacy, including an explicit definition of AI literacy as the ability to understand, evaluate, and effectively use AI technologies, knowledge of AI basics, and awareness of AI’s societal effects. The term ethical AI is defined as practices aligning AI systems with human values and ethical principles, considering societal impacts.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Technology across all five countries.
Explore Technology in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Learners from marginalized communities (e.g., communities of color, low-income populations, rural residents, seniors, and people with disabilities) gain access to localized AI literacy programs funded by NSF.
- Nonprofit organizations, educational institutions, and consortia partnering with NSF benefit from grant opportunities to develop and scale AI literacy.
- Local communities gain access to trusted, locally delivered AI education that can improve digital literacy and informed participation in AI-enabled opportunities.
- Small businesses and entrepreneurs benefit from a more AI-literate workforce and potential improvements in competitiveness and productivity.
- K–12 and higher education systems can integrate AI literacy into curricula, expanding access to AI education across age groups.
Who Bears the Cost
- NSF and other federal agencies incur administrative costs to manage awards, monitor compliance, and produce annual/mandatory reports.
- Recipients face administrative and reporting burdens associated with grant management and program evaluation.
- Educational institutions and nonprofit partners may need to allocate staff and resources to design, implement, and assess AI literacy programs.
- Local communities may incur time and participation costs to engage in AI literacy programs.
- Taxpayers ultimately bear the broader financial cost of federal funding for these programs.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing targeted inclusion of marginalized communities with broad national AI literacy goals and the costs of cross-agency coordination, while ensuring that programs are effective, scalable, and properly evaluated.
The bill’s approach centers on funding AI literacy through NSF grants and driving interagency coordination, but it raises questions about measurement, scope, and equity. Definitional clarity helps, yet the success of local, trusted-source AI education depends on robust evaluation, credible delivery partners, and ongoing funding.
There is potential overlap with existing education and workforce programs, which could lead to duplication without careful alignment and governance. Privacy considerations for collecting demographic data to report on who is served will need to be balanced against program oversight and accountability.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.