AB 1763 amends Education Code §48205 to add and clarify a range of excused absences for K–12 pupils. It explicitly includes mental and behavioral health under illness, names religious observance and retreats, recognizes civic and political participation, and spells out several specific reasons (naturalization ceremonies, precinct service, cultural ceremonies, time with deployed family members, and caregiving for a pupil’s child) as excused.
The bill matters because it changes school operational and fiscal mechanics: districts must accept these absences, allow reasonable make-up work determined by teachers, and cannot claim state attendance apportionment for them. It also gives school administrators discretion to approve additional civic/political absences and imposes specific limits (for example, one schoolday per semester for religious retreats and one schoolday per year for civic/political events at middle/high school).
At a Glance
What It Does
AB 1763 expands the statutory list of excused absences to explicitly cover mental and behavioral health, religious observance (including retreats), civic and political participation, cultural ceremonies, and several other specific events. It requires schools to allow make-up work and clarifies that these absences do not generate state average daily attendance funding.
Who It Affects
K–12 pupils in California, school districts and their administrators, classroom teachers who must set equivalent make-up work, and district finance officers who track ADA-based apportionments. Parents who request excused absences and community groups that run civic or cultural events are also affected.
Why It Matters
The bill widens the reasons pupils can legally miss school, shifting operational burdens to districts (approval processes, recordkeeping, teacher workload) while protecting student participation in religious, civic, cultural, and mental-health-related activities. It creates discrete limits and definitions that will determine how uniformly and predictably schools apply these accommodations.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB 1763 revises the existing statutory catalogue of excused absences in Education Code §48205 and adds precision in several spots. The bill makes three kinds of changes: (1) new or clarified categories of excused absence (for example, explicitly including mental and behavioral health under illness, religious observance and religious retreats, civic and political events, cultural ceremonies, and attendance at naturalization ceremonies); (2) procedural direction about makeup work and administrative discretion; and (3) definitional and funding rules that affect how districts count and respond to these absences.
Under the bill, pupils whose absence falls into any listed category must be excused, and teachers must allow completion of missed assignments and tests that can reasonably be provided; teachers determine what counts as reasonably equivalent work and assign full credit on satisfactory completion. For certain categories the bill imposes explicit limits: attendance at religious retreats is capped at one schoolday per semester, and middle- or high-school pupils may only be excused for one full schoolday per year for civic or political events unless a school administrator grants additional absences under standard discretionary rules.The bill also tightens definitions to reduce ambiguity: it defines “civic or political event” with illustrative activities (voting, poll working, strikes, public commenting, candidate speeches, forums, town halls), defines “cultural,” and clarifies “immediate family.” For absences tied to caregiving for a pupil’s child, the bill bars schools from requiring a doctor’s note.
Finally, AB 1763 states that absences under this section do not generate state apportionment payments — a funding and reporting consequence that matters for district budgets.Taken together, these changes broaden the legal grounds for excused absences while leaving significant implementation detail to districts and teachers: administrators approve many absences under uniform standards the governing board sets, teachers decide equivalent assignments, and superintendents retain discretion over the length of some leaves (for example, time with a deployed uniformed-services family member). That mix of statutory floors and local discretion will shape how consistent the law is in practice.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill explicitly includes mental or behavioral health within the illness category that qualifies a pupil for an excused absence (subdivision (a)(1)).
Religious retreats are excused but limited to one schoolday per semester, and religious observance more broadly is listed as an excused reason (subdivisions (a)(7), (a)(8), and (c)).
Middle and high school pupils may be excused for civic or political events for only one full schoolday per school year; administrators may permit additional days at their discretion (subdivision (a)(12)).
Teachers must allow pupils to complete missed assignments and tests that can reasonably be provided and determine what counts as reasonably equivalent work; satisfactory completion must receive full credit (subdivision (b)).
Absences excused under this section are treated as absences for attendance accounting and do not generate state apportionment payments (subdivision (d)).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Illness, quarantine, and medical appointments
The bill clarifies that illness includes mental and behavioral health; it keeps quarantine under public-health orders and medical appointments as excused reasons. Practically, schools must treat a mental-health absence the same as a physical-illness absence, which affects daily attendance coding and eligibility for excused status. Districts should update attendance codes and guidance so counselors and nurses can flag mental-health-related absences without requiring medical documentation beyond existing policies.
Bereavement, jury duty, and caregiving for a pupil’s child
The bill allows up to five days per incident for attending funerals or grieving an immediate family member or a close associate designated by the parent, and separately allows up to three days for accessing victim services, grief support, or safety planning tied to a family member’s death. It also excuses jury duty and caregiving for a pupil’s own child, and explicitly says schools shall not require a doctor’s note for absences to care for a sick child. These clauses reduce administrative friction for families in crisis but require districts to accept parent attestation in many cases and to set internal standards for when longer absences need administrative approval.
Personal reasons, religious observance, and religious retreats
The statute expands 'justifiable personal reasons' to list observance of a pupil’s religion and religious retreats separately, and it requires written parental request and principal approval under uniform board standards for many personal reasons. It limits religious retreats to one schoolday per semester. Implementation will hinge on districts' 'uniform standards'—boards must decide what documentation and approval workflows they will require while avoiding entanglement with religious doctrine.
Civic or political events: definition and limits
AB 1763 defines 'civic or political event' with a non-exhaustive list—voting, poll working, strikes, public commenting, candidate speeches, forums, town halls—and allows excused absences for middle and high school pupils who notify the school in advance. The statute caps excused time at one schoolday per year for these pupils and permits administrators to authorize more under §48260(c). This creates a predictable baseline for student civic participation while reserving school-level control for excess absences.
Other specified excused reasons (naturalization, cultural events, precinct service, military-related)
The bill lists several discrete excused events—attending a naturalization ceremony, participating in cultural ceremonies, serving as a precinct board member, spending time with a deployed uniformed-services family member (with superintendent discretion on length), and military entrance processing. Each is automatically excused when it occurs. Districts should add these categories to attendance codes and train staff on acceptable verification and duration procedures, especially where the superintendent's or administrator's discretion governs length.
Makeup work, funding, and definitions
The bill requires schools to provide reasonable make-up assignments and tests, with teachers setting what counts as 'reasonably equivalent' and granting full credit for satisfactory completion. It also states that absences under this section count as absences for attendance calculations and do not produce state apportionment (ADA) payments. The statute adds definitions for 'civic or political event,' 'cultural,' 'immediate family,' and 'victim services organization,' which inform how districts code absences and evaluate requests.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Education across all five countries.
Explore Education in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Students with mental or behavioral health needs — they can now use illness-designated excused absences without stigma and access makeup work under the same rules as physical illness.
- Religious and cultural communities and families — the bill explicitly protects observance and retreats (with limits), reducing the risk that students are penalized academically for religious or cultural participation.
- Civic-minded pupils and youth organizers — the law allows excused time for civic and political participation (voting, forums, poll work, etc.), lowering barriers to youth engagement.
- Parents who are custodial parents of young children — a pupil absent to care for their sick child is excused without the school requiring a doctor’s note, easing compliance burdens.
- Immigrant pupils attending naturalization ceremonies and families with deployed service members — the bill protects attendance for these life events and provides district-level discretion for deployment-related time.
Who Bears the Cost
- School districts and local education agencies — they must update attendance policies, train staff on new categories, handle additional administrative approvals, and absorb the financial impact because these absences do not generate ADA apportionment.
- Classroom teachers — teachers must design and grade 'reasonably equivalent' makeup assignments, which increases workload and injects subjectivity into assessment.
- School administrators and superintendents — administrators must exercise discretionary approvals (for extra civic days and deployment-related time) and establish 'uniform standards' for personal-absence approvals, creating new operational responsibilities.
- District finance officers — more absent days that are excused but non-apportionable complicate revenue projections and could pressure programs in districts with higher usage of these excused categories.
- Small or under-resourced schools — they will feel disproportionate effects from lost ADA revenue and may struggle to implement the administrative and documentation changes the bill requires.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances expanding student rights to participate in religious, civic, cultural, and health-related activities against the school system’s need for consistent attendance, instructional integrity, and predictable funding—solving access for pupils increases administrative complexity and shifts fiscal burden onto districts, with local discretion creating uneven implementation and potential equity gaps.
AB 1763 pushes districts to reconcile two objectives: broaden student access to non-classroom civic, religious, cultural, and health-related activities while preserving instructional continuity and fiscal viability. The bill leaves much implementation detail to local actors—boards must adopt 'uniform standards' for approvals, teachers determine what counts as reasonably equivalent makeup work, and administrators retain discretion over additional civic days and deployment-related leave.
That delegation produces flexibility but also risks uneven application across districts and schools.
Several operational questions remain unresolved in the text. The statute permits parental designation of a 'close associate' as immediate family for bereavement purposes, but it does not set a standard for verification, leaving districts to balance respect for family claims against potential misuse.
The restriction that absences under this section 'shall not generate state apportionment payments' creates a clear fiscal consequence, but the bill does not authorize compensatory funding; districts with concentrated use of these codes may therefore face budgetary strain. Finally, giving teachers sole responsibility to determine 'reasonably equivalent' makeup assignments introduces subjectivity that could produce inequitable academic outcomes or disputes over credit for missed work.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.