AB 452 directs the State Coastal Conservancy to create a formal program for designating parts of California’s coastline as state surfing reserves. Local governments (city councils or county boards) would apply after passing a resolution; the Conservancy must approve any application that meets its criteria and then officially designate the site.
The designation is framed as recognition of wave quality, surf culture, and environmental value and is explicitly linked to the Ocean Protection Council’s “other effective area-based conservation measure” standard for the state 30x30 goal. The bill authorizes publicity and signs for approved reserves if the Legislature provides funding and allows the Conservancy to accept donations for those purposes, and it permits revocation if a site no longer meets the criteria.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires the State Coastal Conservancy to adopt designation criteria and an application process for state surfing reserves and to approve applications from local governments that meet the criteria. Once approved, the Conservancy must designate the site and may publicize it and install signs when funded.
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties are city and county governments that manage coastal access and tourism, the State Coastal Conservancy (which administers the program), and surf communities and coastal conservation planners. The Ocean Protection Council is a downstream recipient for 30x30 consideration.
Why It Matters
This creates a formal recognition tool that can be used to highlight surf spots for cultural, economic, and conservation purposes and to plug selected coastal areas into California’s 30x30 conservation framework. Practically, it is an administrative designation with discretionary publicity and funding tied to future appropriations.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB 452 adds a new chapter to the Public Resources Code establishing a process for state-designated surfing reserves. The bill defines a surfing reserve as an area that features protected waves, surf zones, and related environments, and that recognizes the site’s environmental, cultural, and historical significance.
The bill limits applicants to local governments — specifically a city council or county board of supervisors — and frames the program as a way to preserve surf spots for future generations and to support the state’s 30x30 coastal conservation goals.
The Conservancy must adopt designation criteria and an application process by July 1, 2026. When setting those criteria the Conservancy must consider factors such as wave quality and consistency, surf culture and history, environmental characteristics, and management priorities; it may also require a letter of recommendation from “the commission” as part of the review (the text does not name that commission).
After a local government adopts a formal resolution it may apply; the application must describe the geographic location, coastal access, the cultural/historical/ecological/economic values, management priorities, and any additional eligibility elements the Conservancy establishes.If the Conservancy determines the proposed area meets its criteria, it must approve the application and designate the site as a state surfing reserve. The designation is administrative: the Conservancy is required to include the reserve in its publications or maps where appropriate.
Publicizing reserves and erecting signs requires a separate appropriation from the Legislature, although the Conservancy may accept donations to support those activities. The Conservancy may revoke a designation if it later determines the site no longer meets the criteria, and it must notify the Ocean Protection Council of approved reserves so the OPC can consider them for inclusion in California’s 30x30 coastal waters target.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Conservancy has a hard deadline to adopt designation criteria and an application process by July 1, 2026.
Only a city council or a county board of supervisors can apply after passing a formal resolution — nonprofits, tribal governments, special districts, and private parties are excluded.
The definition of a surfing reserve includes the requirement that the area meet the Ocean Protection Council’s standard for an “other effective area-based conservation measure,” linking designation to 30x30 accounting.
Publicity and physical signage for approved reserves are not automatically funded; the Conservancy can only implement those outreach steps upon a legislative appropriation, though it may accept private donations to help pay for them.
The Conservancy can revoke a designation at any time if the site no longer meets the adopted criteria; the bill does not create a statutory appeal process for revocation.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Why the Legislature wants surfing reserves
The bill opens with findings tying the designation to three threads: cultural recognition of surfing, economic and recreational value, and the state’s 30x30 conservation goal. Those findings set the legislative purpose but do not themselves create regulatory powers; they supply policy context the Conservancy must treat as its mandate when developing criteria and evaluating applications.
Key definitions — who may apply and what a reserve is
This section narrows eligible applicants to city councils or county boards of supervisors and defines a surfing reserve to include protected waves, surf zones, surrounding environments, and recognition of cultural/historical significance. Practical effect: other coastal managers or stakeholders must partner with a city or county to nominate a site, and the Conservancy’s later technical criteria must be read against the statutory definition, particularly the requirement to meet the Ocean Protection Council’s OECM standard.
Conservancy must set criteria and may seek a commission recommendation
The Conservancy must establish the designation criteria and application process by a statutory deadline (July 1, 2026). The statute lists factors the Conservancy must consider — wave quality, surf culture and history, environmental characteristics, and management priorities — and permits the Conservancy to require a recommendation letter from “the commission.” That provision gives the Conservancy flexibility to fold in outside technical advice but also introduces ambiguity about which commission and what weight that recommendation will carry.
Application, approval, designation, publicity, and revocation mechanics
Local governments apply after passing a resolution and must supply a geographic description, coastal access details, an account of cultural/historical/ecological/economic values, and management priorities. The Conservancy must approve any application that meets its criteria and then designate the area and include it in Conservancy publications where appropriate. The Conservancy’s duty to publicize reserves and install signage is conditional on legislative appropriation; however, the Conservancy may accept donations to fund those outreach tasks. The Conservancy can also revoke a designation if the site no longer satisfies the criteria.
Coordination with the Ocean Protection Council
After designating a reserve, the Conservancy must transmit notice to the Ocean Protection Council for consideration in the state’s 30x30 coastal waters target. That creates a formal handoff so designated reserves can be evaluated for inclusion in statewide conservation accounting, but the bill leaves OPC discretion in how it treats those notices under its existing frameworks.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Local governments with notable surf spots — get a low-bar administrative pathway to brand and promote their beaches, which can boost tourism and support local management priorities when combined with signage and conservation planning.
- Surf communities and cultural heritage groups — receive formal recognition that can strengthen preservation arguments and local stewardship programs tied to historic and social value of particular surf breaks.
- Coastal conservation planners and the Ocean Protection Council — gain an additional, legislature-backed category of candidate sites to consider for 30x30 accounting, helping to align cultural-resource protection with biodiversity goals.
- State Coastal Conservancy — acquires a targeted tool to integrate recreational and cultural values into coastal conservation work and to broaden its portfolio of voluntary, place-based designations.
Who Bears the Cost
- State Coastal Conservancy — will carry program development, application review, designation tracking, and potential revocation duties with no guaranteed funding; signage and publicity require separate appropriations.
- Local governments (city and county staff) — must prepare applications, documentation of cultural/ecological/economic value, and management plans, consuming staff time and potentially requiring consultant support.
- Taxpayers and the Legislature — may face new appropriation requests to fund signage, outreach, or management actions; absent appropriation, designations remain largely symbolic.
- Coastal Commission or other unnamed 'commission' — the bill may pull another state body into review or recommendation processes without specifying scope or reimbursement, creating potential administrative burdens.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances cultural recognition and voluntary conservation against limited statutory authority and uncertain funding: it offers an attractive, low-conflict way to spotlight surf sites and feed them into 30x30 accounting, but without guaranteed resources or clarified legal protections, the designation risks being largely symbolic and subject to private funding pressures and discretionary revocation.
The bill creates an administrative recognition program rather than establishing express land-use controls or new regulatory protections. That makes the designation useful for branding, conservation planning, and 30x30 accounting, but it does not, by itself, prevent development or change existing permitting paths under the Coastal Act or local plans.
Another unresolved implementation question is the identity and role of the vaguely referenced "commission" whose recommendation the Conservancy may require; the statute does not specify whether that is the California Coastal Commission or another body, nor does it establish how that recommendation factors into the Conservancy’s approval decision.
Funding and governance choices are consequential. Outreach, signage, and on-the-ground interpretation are explicitly tied to a future legislative appropriation, which means early designations could be symbolic without funding for management or visitor infrastructure.
Allowing the Conservancy to accept donations fills that gap but raises governance questions about the influence of private funds on which sites get publicity or physical markers. The revocation clause gives the Conservancy discretion to remove designations, but the bill does not set appeal procedures, monitoring requirements, or timelines for reevaluation — creating potential uncertainty for local managers who invest in a site's branding after designation.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.