Assembly Concurrent Resolution ACR 114 declares October 2025 to be Women’s Small Business Month in California and urges citizens to recognize the economic role of women-owned small businesses. The resolution collects national statistics on women-owned firms, highlights growth among women of color, and invokes the Women’s Business Ownership Act of 1988 as the legal milestone behind the chosen month.
The measure is ceremonial: it contains findings and an encouragement to the public but does not create obligations, funding, or new regulatory authorities. Its practical effect is primarily visibility—signaling legislative attention that advocacy groups, local governments, and economic-development entities can leverage for outreach and events.
At a Glance
What It Does
The resolution formally designates October 2025 as Women’s Small Business Month in California, sets out multiple factual "whereas" findings about the scale and demographics of women-owned businesses, and urges citizens to recognize their economic importance. It directs the Chief Clerk of the Assembly to transmit copies of the resolution for distribution.
Who It Affects
Directly affected are women small-business owners and organizations that support them — trade groups, chambers of commerce, economic-development offices, and nonprofits that can use the designation for programming. State agencies are not commanded to act, though they may be asked informally to participate in observances.
Why It Matters
While symbolic, the resolution compiles data and a narrative that advocacy groups can use to press for future policy or funding. It also frames women’s entrepreneurship as a distinct economic priority in California policy discourse and links current efforts to the 1988 federal Women’s Business Ownership Act.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
ACR 114 is a concurrent resolution that declares October 2025 as Women’s Small Business Month in California. It is entirely hortatory: the Legislature finds and records a set of facts about the number, revenue, and demographic composition of women-owned businesses and then urges public recognition.
The bill text pulls largely from national sources — notably U.S. Small Business Administration statistics and a White House release — to build the case that women entrepreneurs drive job creation, revenue growth, and workforce diversity.
Because the resolution is ceremonial, it does not appropriate funds, create new programs, or change regulatory requirements. Its only formal operative steps are the declaration itself and an administrative instruction to the Chief Clerk to transmit copies of the resolution.
The bill notes no fiscal impact and contains no enforcement mechanism; any follow-up activity depends on voluntary action by agencies, local governments, business groups, and advocacy organizations.Practically, the designation functions as a policy signal. Local chambers, minority business centers, and state economic-development offices typically use such recognitions to coordinate events, marketing, targeted outreach for capital and procurement opportunities, and data briefings.
The resolution also anchors October as the month tied to the historical marker—the Women’s Business Ownership Act of 1988—making it a convenient focal point for anniversary-oriented programming and media attention.The text highlights barriers reported by women entrepreneurs—access to capital, mentorship, networks, and work–family balance—and calls attention to faster growth among women of color. That framing can influence stakeholders who draft subsequent budget requests or legislation by establishing a legislative record of concern; however, the resolution itself leaves unresolved whether and how the state will translate recognition into policy changes or funding priorities.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The resolution designates October 2025 as Women’s Small Business Month in California and is purely hortatory—no funding, mandates, or regulatory changes follow from it.
The bill’s findings rely on national data: it cites an estimated 13,000,000 women-owned businesses in the U.S.
$1.9 trillion in revenue, and more than 10,000,000 employees (SBA figures referenced for 2022).
ACR 114 emphasizes demographic shifts: women of color are identified as the fastest-growing group of new business owners and account for a substantial share of female entrepreneurship.
The resolution ties the month to the Women’s Business Ownership Act of 1988 (signed October 25, 1988) as the historical rationale for observing October.
The only administrative instruction is to have the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of the resolution for appropriate distribution; the measure states no fiscal effects.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Findings on scale, demographics, and barriers
This cluster of clauses assembles statistical and historical findings: SBA estimates on the number and revenue of women-owned businesses, breakdowns by race and ethnicity, growth trends for women of color, and survey-based statements about barriers (access to capital, networks, mentorship, and balancing responsibilities). For practitioners, these findings matter because they create a legislative record that can be cited in future policy discussions even though they impose no requirements.
Designation of Women’s Small Business Month
A single short operative provision formally designates October 2025 as Women’s Small Business Month in California. Legally this is a declaratory act: it signals state recognition but does not change law, create a program, nor authorize spending. Compliance officers and agency counsel do not receive new duties from this provision.
Distribution instruction to the Chief Clerk
The resolution directs the Chief Clerk of the Assembly to transmit copies of the resolution to the author for appropriate distribution. Mechanically, this is the only administrative step: it enables the author and stakeholders to circulate the text to interested parties, but it carries no operational mandate for state agencies or local governments.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Economy across all five countries.
Explore Economy in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Women small-business owners — gain visibility and a legislative record that advocacy groups can use to amplify funding and procurement requests or to promote events during October.
- Women of color entrepreneurs — the resolution highlights their rapid growth and specific representation stats, providing targeted messaging and outreach hooks for organizations serving these communities.
- Business support organizations and chambers of commerce — can leverage the designation to coordinate workshops, networking, and marketing campaigns tied to October observances.
- Economic-development and procurement offices — receive a public-facing reason to promote supplier-diversity initiatives and outreach to women-owned firms during the designated month.
Who Bears the Cost
- Legislative staff and the author’s office — minor administrative time to distribute the resolution and coordinate publicity; no new budget line is created but there is modest staff bandwidth required.
- Nonprofit and advocacy organizations — may face expectations to organize programming without new state funding, shifting costs onto their operational budgets if they choose to act.
- Local governments and state agencies that opt to participate — any events or targeted outreach they undertake will need to be absorbed into existing budgets absent an appropriation.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is symbolic recognition versus substantive action: the resolution draws valuable attention to women-owned businesses and documents barriers they face, but it does not authorize funding or obligations, leaving advocates and agencies to convert goodwill into concrete programs with no new state-directed resources.
The resolution’s primary limitation is its ceremonial form. By design it records concerns and raises visibility without committing resources or creating enforceable obligations.
That creates a familiar policy gap: recognition without a plan. Stakeholders may interpret the resolution as a precursor to concrete support (grants, procurement targets, technical-assistance programs), but the text contains no mechanism to translate recognition into funding or regulatory change.
The findings primarily cite national data rather than California-specific metrics; that weakens any claim that the resolution builds a state-level evidence base. Implementation questions remain unanswered: who will measure the designation’s impact, which agencies (if any) will be expected to respond, and whether the Legislature intends follow-up legislation or budget proposals.
Finally, because the resolution spotlights disparities and barriers, it may raise constituent expectations for solutions—yet it provides none, potentially increasing pressure on advocacy groups and agencies to deliver outcomes without commensurate resources.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.