SCR 110 is a California Senate Concurrent Resolution that proclaims March 16–22, 2026 as "Women’s Military History Week" and recognizes the service and sacrifices of women in U.S. military history. The resolution catalogs historical examples and statistics, references the lifting of the Department of Defense restriction on women in combat roles, and urges Californians to honor women’s military contributions.
The measure is advisory and ceremonial: it contains no regulatory mandates, appropriations, or penalties and the Legislative Counsel notes no fiscal committee action. Its practical effect is to create a named week for state- and locally organized observances and to put the Legislature on record about women’s roles in the armed forces—an action that can shape public programming and timelines for commemorations but does not create new legal entitlements or funding streams.
At a Glance
What It Does
SCR 110 names the week of March 16–22, 2026 as Women’s Military History Week in California, formally recognizing the contributions of women in U.S. military service and citing the lifting of the combat ban for women. The resolution lists historical examples and statistics and asks the Secretary of the Senate to transmit copies to the author for distribution.
Who It Affects
Primary audiences are women veterans and active-duty service members, veterans organizations, museums and historical societies, schools and educators, and state and local entities that plan commemorative events. The resolution does not impose duties on private sector entities or create new legal obligations for state agencies.
Why It Matters
By creating a designated week, the Legislature signals public and institutional recognition that can trigger commemorative programming, educational activities, and outreach by civic groups. Because the resolution is symbolic and unfunded, its main impact is agenda-setting—shaping what topics institutions choose to highlight rather than changing policy.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SCR 110 is a ceremonial, nonbinding resolution that puts the California Legislature on record recognizing "Women Warriors" and designating a specific week in 2026 for commemoration. The text devotes most of its language to a preamble that recounts historical examples (from Revolutionary War service through Civil War spies and medical personnel, to modern women in intelligence, special operations support roles, and command positions) and cites aggregate figures—such as roughly 300,000 women who served in Iraq and Afghanistan and more than 3,000,000 women who have served since the Revolution.
Practically, the operative language is short: the Legislature proclaims the week of March 16–22, 2026 as Women’s Military History Week, recognizes the contributions and sacrifices of women since the Department of Defense lifted the restriction on women in combat roles, and encourages Californians to honor those sacrifices. The only administrative instruction is to have the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of the resolution to the author for distribution.
The measure is explicitly nonfiscal (no fiscal committee action) and contains no grant programs, reporting requirements, or compliance obligations.Because the resolution is symbolic, its utility comes through soft mechanisms: it creates a state-recognized occasion for public commemorations, provides a legislative citation that museums and schools can use in program materials, and offers veterans organizations a focal point for outreach and recognition. It does not, however, create an ongoing annual observance, appropriate funds for events, or direct state agencies to adopt curricula or policies; any follow-up activity would depend on other actors choosing to act on the Legislature’s encouragement.The text also emphasizes certain narratives—examples of individual service and milestones (first African American woman Buffalo Soldier, first female four-star general in the Army, the role of female engagement teams and cultural support teams)—which make the resolution useful to organizations seeking historical touchpoints.
At the same time, the resolution does not address outstanding policy issues that affect women in the military today, such as healthcare access, transition services, or sexual assault prevention and response.
The Five Things You Need to Know
SCR 110 formally designates March 16–22, 2026 as Women’s Military History Week in California.
The resolution explicitly acknowledges the lifting of the Department of Defense restriction on women in combat roles and ties that event to the call for public commemoration.
The preamble cites specific statistics and examples: roughly 300,000 women served in Iraq and Afghanistan, over 400 women have been killed in combat since World War I, and over 3,000,000 women have served since the Revolutionary War.
The only administrative action required is a clerical transmittal: the Secretary of the Senate must send copies of the resolution to the author for distribution.
The Legislative Counsel records no fiscal effect; the resolution creates no funding, mandates, or enforcement mechanisms—it is purely symbolic.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Historical context and supporting facts
The preamble collects historical vignettes and data points to justify the recognition: Revolutionary War service, Civil War disguises and medical service, milestones for African American and Latina service members, examples of modern combat awards and roles, and the evolution of female engagement teams and cultural support teams. For practitioners, this section is where the Legislature frames the narrative it wants reflected in commemorations—selecting particular figures and statistics that organizations can adopt for programming or interpretive displays.
Designation of Women’s Military History Week (March 16–22, 2026)
This is the operative clause that establishes the specific week in 2026 as the state-recognized Women’s Military History Week. It creates a discrete calendared observance that state and local actors can cite when scheduling events or educational activities. Importantly, the text names a single week in 2026 rather than creating a recurring annual observance or directing agencies to undertake specific actions.
Recognition and encouragement to honor service
The resolution formally recognizes women’s contributions to the military and encourages Californians to honor sacrifices—language that is hortatory rather than mandatory. This clause authorizes no new programs but functions as a policy signal: recipients of the message (schools, museums, nonprofits, local governments) are invited, not required, to act and can use the Legislature’s declaration as institutional backing for ceremonies or curricula.
Administrative transmittal
The resolution directs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit copies to the author for distribution. This is a standard, low-cost clerical step that places the resolution into circulation among stakeholders but does not assign follow-up duties to executive branch agencies or appropriate state funds.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Veterans across all five countries.
Explore Veterans in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Women veterans and active-duty women service members — the resolution increases public recognition and provides a legislative citation organizations can use when honoring or publicizing women’s military service.
- Veterans organizations, museums, and historical societies — they gain a state-designated week to anchor special exhibits, programming, outreach campaigns, and fundraising tied to women’s military history.
- Schools and educators — districts and teachers receive a clear occasion to integrate women’s military history into lesson plans and student projects without needing separate legislative approval.
- California National Guard and state military-affiliated organizations — the week gives state military units a platform for internal recognition, recruitment messaging, and public engagement on gender integration milestones.
Who Bears the Cost
- State and legislative staff — minimal administrative time to process and distribute the resolution text and coordinate any official events or communications tied to the designation.
- Local governments and nonprofits that choose to host events — if they act on the encouragement they will absorb event costs because the resolution provides no funding.
- Educational institutions — incorporating new commemorative materials or programming may require curricular time and staff resources without state-directed funding or mandates.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is symbolic recognition versus substantive change: the Legislature can honor service through a nonbinding proclamation that raises visibility, but that approach leaves unanswered whether symbolic observances should be paired with resources or policy reforms to address ongoing material issues affecting women who serve.
The principal implementation challenge is that the resolution is symbolic: it creates expectations without providing resources or statutory authority. Organizations that want to mark the week will need to identify funding and staff time for events or educational work themselves.
That limits the practical reach of the designation to groups with capacity to act. Another tension is narrative selection.
The resolution highlights particular individuals, units, and statistics to make a case for recognition; those choices shape the public story but omit other issues—such as veterans’ healthcare access, retention, and gender-based misconduct—that many stakeholders consider part of the lived experience of women in uniform.
The resolution designates only a single week in 2026 rather than establishing an ongoing annual observance; that raises a question about durability. Without follow-on legislation or agency directives, the week may have impact in 2026 and then fade.
Finally, while the resolution ties commemoration to the lifting of the combat ban, it does not address operational or policy gaps that remain (for example, disparities in post-service care or in metrics for gender integration). These omissions make the resolution a useful awareness tool but leave systemic issues untouched.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.