Assembly Concurrent Resolution ACR 18 designates January 23, 2025, as Maternal Health Awareness Day in California. The text collects findings on national and state maternal mortality trends, highlights the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC) and California Pregnancy‑Associated Mortality Review (CA‑PAMR) as drivers of past improvement, and emphasizes maternal mental health and racial disparities that still require attention.
The resolution is symbolic: it does not create new programs or funding, but it directs attention to a set of policy priorities—continued public health surveillance, enhanced screening and coordination for maternal mental health, postpartum and interconception care, culturally and linguistically relevant outreach, and targeted support for Black women—to sustain and accelerate California’s progress on maternal outcomes.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill is a concurrent resolution that proclaims January 23, 2025, as Maternal Health Awareness Day and memorializes a series of findings about maternal mortality, quality‑improvement efforts, maternal mental health, and racial disparities. It names CMQCC and CA‑PAMR and calls for continued public health surveillance and coordination of obstetric and psychiatric care.
Who It Affects
Directly affected are state public health officials, maternal‑health quality collaboratives (notably CMQCC), hospitals and obstetric providers, maternal‑mental‑health advocates, and community groups focused on racial equity in maternal outcomes. Because it is nonbinding, it mainly affects agenda‑setting and outreach rather than regulatory obligations.
Why It Matters
The resolution consolidates California’s narrative of measurable progress while flagging substantial gaps—especially racial disparities and maternal mental health—that shape policy priorities. For professionals, it signals where legislators expect agencies and stakeholders to focus resources and outreach, even if it does not allocate funds.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
ACR 18 is a declarative, nonbinding legislative resolution that proclaims a single awareness day and assembles a set of factual findings and policy prompts. It begins by locating the problem: the United States has among the highest maternal mortality rates in wealthy nations, with over 700 pregnancy‑related deaths nationally each year and many deemed preventable.
The resolution contrasts that national picture with California’s progress, crediting state initiatives for historic declines in maternal deaths.
The text gives particular credit to the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative—founded in 2006 at Stanford and working with CA‑PAMR and the Public Health Institute—for deploying toolkits, statewide collaboratives, and a Maternal Data Center to drive quality improvement. It records a 55 percent decline in maternal mortality between 2006 and 2013 and documents lower, relatively stable pregnancy‑related mortality ratios in subsequent years cited in the findings.Beyond mortality metrics, the resolution emphasizes maternal mental health as a component of maternal mortality and morbidity.
It reports CA‑PAMR findings on suicide and stresses expanded screening, diagnosis, treatment continuity, and insurance coverage for postpartum mental health conditions. The text also underscores factors to improve birth outcomes—preconception health, postpartum care and interconception services, breastfeeding support, home visiting for vulnerable women, and culturally and linguistically appropriate outreach.The resolution draws a sharp line on racial inequities: it points out that Black women represent a small share of pregnancies but a disproportionately large share of pregnancy‑related deaths and substantially higher mortality ratios.
It urges continued surveillance by the State Department of Public Health, better coordination between obstetrics and psychiatry, and sustained efforts to narrow these disparities. Practically, the measure ends by instructing the Assembly Chief Clerk to transmit copies of the resolution for distribution; it does not attach funding, regulatory mandates, or statutory changes.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Legislature adopts a nonbinding concurrent resolution declaring January 23, 2025, as Maternal Health Awareness Day in California.
The resolution cites the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC), founded in 2006 at Stanford, and highlights its Maternal Data Center and statewide quality‑improvement toolkits as central to California’s improvements.
The text records a 55% decline in maternal mortality in California from 2006 through 2013 and reports a maternal mortality rate of seven deaths per 100,000 live births for that period.
It documents stark racial disparities: Black women account for about 5% of pregnancies in California but 21% of pregnancy‑related deaths, with a pregnancy‑related mortality ratio three to four times higher than other racial/ethnic groups.
The resolution urges continued surveillance by the State Department of Public Health and better coordination of obstetric and psychiatric care and expanded screening for mental health and substance use—but it includes no funding or binding implementation requirements.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Problem statement and national‑state contrast
These initial findings set the context: the United States fares poorly on maternal mortality relative to peer nations, and many pregnancy‑related deaths are preventable. The resolution then contrasts that with California’s trajectory, framing the state as having reversed earlier increases through targeted programs. For practitioners, this section matters because it frames all subsequent recommendations as responses to both a national crisis and a state success story—useful when prioritizing which interventions to sustain or scale.
Role of CMQCC, CA‑PAMR, and data infrastructure
These clauses name CMQCC, CA‑PAMR, and the Public Health Institute and describe tools they use—research, toolkits, outreach collaboratives, and a Maternal Data Center. Naming these organizations signals that legislative attention and future expectations center on data‑driven quality improvement. For hospitals and health systems, that means policymakers will look to these entities when assessing scalable best practices.
Maternal mental health, screening, and postpartum care
This cluster highlights maternal mental health as a contributor to maternal mortality, notes CA‑PAMR’s suicide findings, and endorses screening, treatment continuity, and insurance coverage upon diagnosis. Practically this raises expectations for expanded screening programs and cross‑disciplinary coordination (obstetrics and psychiatry), but the resolution stops short of directing specific programmatic steps or funding—leaving implementation choices to agencies and providers.
Racial and community‑level disparities and recommended focus areas
These clauses identify racial disparities—calling out the disproportionate burden borne by Black women—and list targeted actions: home visiting for vulnerable pregnant women, culturally and linguistically relevant outreach, and additional supports for Black women. The section signals legislative intent to prioritize equity, which will influence how agencies and funders evaluate programs even though the resolution itself does not reallocate resources.
Proclamation and administrative direction
The operative language contains two practical items: (1) the formal proclamation that January 23, 2025, is Maternal Health Awareness Day; and (2) an instruction that the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of the resolution to the author for distribution. These are procedural and symbolic actions; they establish an official observance and facilitate dissemination but do not create enforceable duties or appropriations.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Maternal‑health quality collaboratives (e.g., CMQCC): The resolution elevates their role and data platforms, strengthening their legitimacy as technical leaders for statewide improvement and potential focal points for public‑private partnerships.
- Pregnant and postpartum women (particularly those in targeted outreach programs): The emphasis on screening, postpartum visits, interconception care, breastfeeding support, and home visiting can increase attention and advocacy for services that directly affect care continuity.
- Public health communicators and advocacy groups: The declared awareness day and the resolution’s findings create an occasion and legislative backing for campaigns, fundraising, and community engagement around maternal mental health and racial equity.
Who Bears the Cost
- State Department of Public Health and local health agencies: The resolution asks them to continue surveillance and coordination—activities that consume staff time and data resources—without providing new funding.
- Hospitals and obstetric providers: The text raises expectations for more aggressive screening and coordination with psychiatry, which may require protocol changes, training, and increased referral capacity.
- Community‑based organizations serving Black women and other vulnerable populations: The spotlight increases demand for culturally and linguistically appropriate services; these groups may face pressure to expand outreach without commensurate funding.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is symbolic recognition versus substantive change: the resolution raises awareness and directs attention to surveillance, screening, and equity, but it does not provide funding or binding mandates—so it may heighten expectations without guaranteeing the resources or programmatic authority needed to close the gaps it identifies.
ACR 18 is fundamentally symbolic. It consolidates a data‑driven narrative of California progress while enumerating priorities; however, it contains no appropriation or regulatory requirements.
That creates a familiar implementation gap: policymakers and advocates can point to legislative intent, but agencies and providers must still identify and fund concrete programs to realize the goals. The resolution also leans heavily on CMQCC and CA‑PAMR data and historical trends (notably statistics through 2013 and 2016 in the findings).
Relying on older cited metrics risks misalignment if recent years show different patterns or if local variations require different interventions.
Another tension involves maternal mental health screening. Increased screening can identify more women in need, but without parallel investment in treatment capacity, insurance coverage, and care coordination, screenings could create unmet demand and administrative burdens.
Similarly, naming targeted supports for Black women correctly centers equity but also raises complex questions about which interventions (home visiting, community health workers, implicit bias training, broader social determinants work) will be prioritized and how success will be measured. Finally, because the resolution is nonbinding, its practical effect will depend on whether state agencies, funders, and health systems treat it as a cue to reallocate staff and dollars—an uncertain prospect absent statutory or budgetary follow‑through.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.