This concurrent resolution declares May 2025 as Maternal Mental Health Awareness Month and memorializes a set of factual findings about maternal mental health, treatment gaps, and downstream harms. The text characterizes maternal mental health disorders broadly — naming depression, anxiety, and postpartum psychosis — and links untreated illness to adverse outcomes for mothers and children.
The resolution is ceremonial: it contains no funding provision or regulatory mandate. Its practical effect is signal-based — creating a public record that agencies, local health departments, providers, and advocacy groups can cite when launching outreach, training, or awareness activities.
For professionals, the relevant question is not new legal obligations but how this formal recognition may shift priorities, justify communications, or influence future policy conversations.
At a Glance
What It Does
The resolution proclaims May 2025 as Maternal Mental Health Awareness Month and sets out several legislative findings about prevalence, treatment gaps, and harms associated with untreated maternal mental health disorders. It also directs the Chief Clerk of the Assembly to transmit copies of the resolution to the author for distribution.
Who It Affects
State and local public health agencies, maternal and perinatal care providers, advocacy organizations, and entities that run public education campaigns are the primary audiences who may act on the designation. It does not impose duties on insurers, employers, or clinicians.
Why It Matters
Although nonbinding, the resolution creates an authoritative, citable statement of legislative concern that can be used to mobilize outreach, justify grant proposals or internal program shifts, and raise the profile of maternal mental health in policy discussions going forward.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
ACR 78 is a one-page concurrent resolution that does two things: (1) records a set of factual findings about maternal mental health and (2) dedicates May 2025 as Maternal Mental Health Awareness Month. The findings section enumerates the types of maternal mental health disorders the Legislature is highlighting (including depression, anxiety, and postpartum psychosis) and frames maternal mental health as a common pregnancy-related complication that deserves attention.
The resolution includes concrete statistics in its findings: it states that maternal mental health affects one in five women during or after pregnancy, reports the same one-in-five figure for California mothers, and notes that fewer than 15 percent of identified cases receive treatment. The text also links untreated disorders to adverse birth outcomes, impaired maternal-infant bonding, poor infant growth, childhood emotional and behavioral problems, and estimates the lifetime medical and economic cost at roughly $32,000 per mother-infant pair.Mechanically, ACR 78 does not create new programs, require reporting, or appropriate funds.
Its operational direction is limited to the administrative act of transmitting copies to the author. The real-world effect will depend on how state and local actors — public health departments, healthcare systems, nonprofit organizations, and funders — use the designation to mount campaigns, expand screening, or prioritize maternal mental health in planning and grant-making.Because the resolution is declarative rather than regulatory, compliance officers and legal counsels will not face new statutory duties.
However, communications directors, program managers, and grant writers should note the formal recognition: agencies may cite the resolution when seeking resources, launching awareness efforts in May, or coordinating with community partners to reduce stigma and increase access to screening and treatment.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The resolution characterizes maternal mental health disorders to include depression, anxiety, and postpartum psychosis.
It states maternal mental health affects one in five women during or after pregnancy nationally and reports the same one-in-five rate for California mothers.
The text reports that fewer than 15 percent of identified maternal mental health cases receive treatment.
The Legislature’s findings link untreated maternal mental health disorders to adverse birth outcomes, impaired bonding, poor infant growth, childhood behavioral problems, and estimate about $32,000 in medical and economic costs per mother–infant pair.
The only operative instruction is administrative: the Chief Clerk of the Assembly must transmit copies of the resolution to the author for distribution.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Legislative findings about prevalence, treatment gap, harms, and cost
This section lists the factual bases that the Legislature wants on record. It defines the scope of "maternal mental health disorders," cites prevalence rates (one in five), identifies a treatment gap (fewer than 15% treated), and describes downstream clinical and developmental harms. It also includes a specific per-pair cost estimate (~$32,000), which is now a documented legislative claim that agencies and advocates can reference when arguing for resources.
Proclaims May 2025 as Maternal Mental Health Awareness Month
This clause formally dedicates a calendar month for awareness activities. Legally this is a declaration rather than an instruction: it imposes no mandates, reporting requirements, or funding. Practically, the designation creates a time-bound opportunity (May 2025) for coordinated outreach, education, screening drives, and stakeholder events that public and private actors may choose to pursue.
Transmission of the resolution for distribution
This short, administrative provision directs the Chief Clerk to transmit copies to the author for 'appropriate distribution.' That language is intentionally open-ended: it enables the author and their office to provide the resolution to agencies, nonprofits, local health departments, and partners, but it does not require any recipient to take specific actions.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Pregnant and postpartum people and their families — the designation elevates public awareness and reduces stigma by putting maternal mental health on the official legislative record, which can improve recognition of symptoms and prompt help-seeking.
- Public health departments and community health organizations — they gain a formally recognized hook for outreach campaigns, training funding applications, and public education in May 2025.
- Maternal health advocates and nonprofits — the resolution supplies a cited legislative finding and time-bound focus that advocacy groups can use to amplify messaging, fundraise, and coordinate events.
- Perinatal care providers and hospitals — the spotlight may increase uptake of screening protocols and integration of behavioral health referrals during perinatal visits, enhancing clinical quality improvement efforts.
Who Bears the Cost
- State and local public health agencies — while the resolution contains no appropriation, agencies that choose to act (campaigns, materials, staff time) will absorb operational costs within existing budgets.
- Community nonprofits and advocacy groups — organizations that respond with events or expanded services may need to allocate staff time and seek funding to meet increased demand.
- Healthcare clinics and provider networks — if providers scale up screening or referral pathways in response to the awareness month, they will face implementation and coordination costs, particularly where behavioral health capacity is limited.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between symbolic recognition and substantive change: the resolution raises visibility and creates a policy hook for action, but without funding or mandates it risks generating expectations that cannot be met, potentially shifting responsibility to local actors and providers rather than solving underlying access, coverage, and workforce problems.
The resolution sits squarely in the realm of symbolic lawmaking: it records concern and creates a time-limited focal point without attaching resources or mandates. That creates both opportunity and frustration.
On one hand, the legislative findings and the official designation give advocates and agencies an evidentiary lever to pursue grants, partnerships, and programmatic changes. On the other hand, communities with limited capacity may find the designation raises expectations that cannot be met without new funding, and the resolution does not address how screening, treatment capacity, insurance coverage, or workforce barriers will be resolved.
Another implementation challenge is data and attribution. The resolution quotes prevalence and cost figures, but it does not identify data sources or methodology; stakeholders relying on those numbers in grant applications or program planning should verify the underlying studies.
The framing also treats maternal mental health as a broadly shared risk, which is useful for raising general awareness but masks disparities: the resolution does not direct targeted outreach to populations with higher barriers to care (e.g., low-income, rural, immigrant, or non-English-speaking mothers), nor does it propose metrics to measure whether awareness activities actually increase treatment rates.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.