This concurrent resolution officially designates a state observance recognizing women’s contributions to science, technology, engineering, and math and calls attention to gender imbalances in those fields. The text collects workforce statistics on women’s representation across STEM occupations and commends organizations and individuals who promote women’s participation in STEM.
The measure is purely commemorative: it contains no appropriations, regulatory mandates, or enforcement mechanisms. Its practical effect is symbolic — a statement of legislative priorities that advocacy groups, schools, and employers can cite, but it does not create new programs, reporting duties, or funding streams.
At a Glance
What It Does
The resolution creates an official state observance honoring women in STEM and uses preamble language to summarize workforce data and trends. It is a nonbinding, ceremonial enactment that directs clerical distribution of the resolution text but imposes no regulatory duties.
Who It Affects
The measure primarily affects stakeholders interested in public recognition: advocacy groups, educational institutions, and employers that run outreach or recruitment programs. State administrative agencies and the Legislature are only affected to the extent they may publicize or mark the observance.
Why It Matters
Although symbolic, the resolution bundles published workforce statistics into the legislative record, giving advocates a concise citation and signaling state-level attention to STEM gender gaps. For professionals designing outreach or compliance strategies, the resolution can be used as a reference point for public messaging without creating new legal obligations.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The resolution is a short, ceremonial document that compiles a series of "whereas" clauses about women’s contributions and representation in STEM, then resolves to establish a state observance recognizing those contributions. The preamble cites several sector-specific percentages and historical comparisons to frame underrepresentation as a continuing concern.
Rather than proposing programs or budgetary commitments, the text focuses on recognition and encouragement.
Because it is a concurrent resolution, both chambers of the Legislature adopt the language as an expression of legislative sentiment rather than as binding state law. The operative language commends efforts to expand women’s participation in STEM careers and instructs the legislative clerical office to provide copies of the resolution for distribution.
There are no compliance deadlines, no grant programs, and no regulatory changes included in the text.Practically, this means the resolution’s value is informational and rhetorical. Schools, universities, nonprofit organizations, and private employers can incorporate the resolution into outreach materials or public events.
However, the bill does not require state agencies or other entities to take action, report on progress, or allocate resources to address the underlying workforce gaps it cites.Finally, because the resolution records specific workforce figures and trends in the legislative record, it becomes a concise, legislators-endorsed source of state-focused talking points. That can help advocates and program managers but does not substitute for statutory or budgetary measures needed to change recruiting, hiring, or education pipelines.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The text is a concurrent resolution — an expression of legislative sentiment rather than a statute with legal force.
The bill’s preamble reports that women make up approximately 35 percent of workers in STEM-related jobs overall.
It lists occupation-specific shares cited in the resolution: life, physical, and social sciences (48.6%); architecture and engineering (17.2%); computer and mathematical occupations (26%); and biological, chemical/material, and engineering occupations at 55%, 36%, and 16.6%, respectively.
The legislative digest records no fiscal committee referral and the document contains an explicit fiscal note indicating no fiscal effect.
The resolution directs the legislative clerk to transmit copies of the adopted language to the author for distribution, a standard clerical step without implementation requirements.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Frames the problem with workforce statistics and historical context
This section aggregates data points and historical statements to describe women’s participation across STEM subsectors. For practitioners, the clauses are the resolution’s substantive content: they establish the legislative framing that advocates will cite in outreach and grant applications. The language also signals which occupation categories the Legislature views as most imbalanced, which can shape messaging even though it does not mandate research or follow-up.
Establishes an official state observance and commends supporters
This provision announces an official observance to honor women in STEM and commends those who promote participation. Its practical implication is recognition only — it creates no obligations, no new programs, and no reporting or enforcement mechanisms. Organizations may leverage the commemoration for publicity and partnership, but the clause does not change statutory duties or funding.
Directs distribution of the resolution text
A short administrative clause instructs the legislative clerk to provide copies of the resolution to the author for distribution. That step puts the text into circulation as an official legislative document but does not trigger implementation responsibilities for state agencies or local entities; the burden is clerical and related to dissemination rather than action.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Education across all five countries.
Explore Education in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Women and girls interested in STEM — the proclamation raises visibility and can be used by educators and advocates to attract attention to careers and programs, helping recruitment and outreach efforts.
- Nonprofit and advocacy organizations focused on gender equity in STEM — they gain a state-endorsed citation to support awareness campaigns, events, and fundraising appeals.
- Educational institutions and career programs — schools and universities can align programming and public events with the observance to boost outreach and donor engagement, using the resolution as a promotional asset.
Who Bears the Cost
- Legislative clerical offices — minor administrative work to publish and distribute the resolution text, though the bill indicates no fiscal impact.
- State agencies and educational institutions — indirect opportunity costs if they choose to mount events or campaigns without new funding; the resolution creates expectations rather than resources.
- Advocates and program leads — reputational risk if groups or employers use the commemoration for PR without accompanying substantive plans to address the cited workforce gaps.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between symbolic acknowledgment and substantive change: the resolution raises visibility for gender gaps in STEM, which helps advocacy and recruitment, but by design it avoids binding commitments or funding—so it can signal government concern without creating the accountability or resources needed to close the gaps.
The resolution trades symbolic recognition for concrete action: it collects statistics and signals support but stops short of creating mechanisms to measure or remedy the disparities it cites. That leaves open the question of how the Legislature—and stakeholders—expect to translate recognition into measurable outcomes.
Without accompanying appropriations or statutory mandates, any follow-through depends on voluntary action by agencies, schools, employers, and nonprofits.
The bill also embeds a set of specific workforce percentages into the legislative record without indicating their source methodology or a plan to update them. That can create challenges if advocates or officials treat the figures as current benchmarks; data revisions or different occupational taxonomies could make the cited percentages misleading over time.
Finally, the resolution’s public value depends on how stakeholders use it — it may amplify advocacy and outreach, but it also risks being treated as a substitute for policy changes that require funding and durable program design.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.