ACR 65 is a ceremonial concurrent resolution that reaffirms May 2025 as California Tourism Month and urges Californians to support tourism and local businesses by traveling in‑state. The text assembles a set of 2024 statistics—visitor spending, job counts, tax revenue, and county growth—to justify the proclamation and to frame tourism as an economic and community good.
The resolution does not create regulatory obligations or appropriate money; it is symbolic. Its practical value is promotional: it gives state lawmakers and marketing partners a formal statement they can cite in outreach, local campaigns, and partner communications, but it imposes no new programs or funding responsibilities on state agencies.
At a Glance
What It Does
ACR 65 is a concurrent resolution that proclaims May 2025 as California Tourism Month, collects supporting findings about tourism’s economic impact, and urges citizens to travel within the state. The measure is nonbinding and includes a clerical instruction to transmit copies of the resolution for appropriate distribution.
Who It Affects
Primary audiences are tourism-dependent businesses (notably small hotels, restaurants, attractions), Visit California and local tourism bureaus, county and city economic development offices, and the workforce employed in hospitality and travel sectors. Residents are the target of the 'urge' to travel; no legal obligations attach.
Why It Matters
Although symbolic, the resolution packages recent economic data into a legislative endorsement that marketing organizations and local governments can use to justify campaigns or secure private partnerships. It signals legislative support for the sector but does not address structural issues—workforce, housing, or infrastructure—that constrain tourism growth.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
ACR 65 is a short, ceremonial measure that strings together 'whereas' findings about tourism in California and then issues two simple resolutions: reaffirm May 2025 as California Tourism Month and urge citizens to support tourism by traveling within the state. The bill lists specific 2024 figures—roughly $157.3 billion in visitor spending, support for about 1,165,760 jobs, $12.6 billion in state and local tax revenue, and growth in visitor spending in 50 of 58 counties—to make the case for the proclamation.
Because it is a concurrent resolution, ACR 65 does not change law, allocate funds, or direct agencies to take regulatory action. The operative language is hortatory: it 'urges' citizens and asks the Chief Clerk of the Assembly to transmit copies to the author for distribution.
That limited procedural step is how the Legislature typically funnels ceremonial text into communications for stakeholders and the public.Practically, the resolution functions as a piece of legislative communications. Visit California, county tourism offices, chambers of commerce, and private hospitality firms can cite the resolution to lend legislative weight to promotional initiatives or fundraising appeals.
Local governments may coordinate events or marketing tied to the May designation, but any activity will rely on existing budgets or private partnerships because the resolution contains no funding mechanism.The text also reaffirms an earlier legislative posture: it notes the Legislature declared every May to be California Tourism Month in 2016. By restating that precedent alongside current data, the resolution aims to create continuity for annual marketing efforts rather than introduce new policy.
The bill’s value is therefore rhetorical and mobilizational rather than regulatory or fiscal.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The resolution formally reaffirms May 2025 as California Tourism Month and urges residents to support tourism by traveling in‑state.
The bill cites 2024 tourism figures: about $157.3 billion in visitor spending, roughly 1,165,760 jobs supported, $12.6 billion in state and local tax revenue, and spending growth in 50 of 58 counties.
It is a concurrent resolution with no appropriations or regulatory changes—Fiscal Committee: NO—so it creates no binding legal obligations or new state spending.
The measure recalls the 2016 legislative declaration that designated every May as California Tourism Month, signaling continuity rather than new policy.
The resolution includes a clerical instruction requiring the Chief Clerk of the Assembly to transmit copies of the resolution to the author for distribution to stakeholders.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Findings compiling economic and social support for tourism
This section gathers the factual predicates the Legislature relies on: 2024 visitor spending and job figures, county‑level growth patterns, the share of tourism businesses that are small businesses, tax revenue generated, and references to Visit California research on mental health benefits. The function is persuasive rather than legislative—these findings justify the proclamation and give marketing partners quotable statistics for outreach.
Reaffirms May 2025 as California Tourism Month and issues an exhortation to travel
The operative clause states the proclamation and 'urges the citizens' to travel within the state as an act of civic pride. Because it uses hortatory language ('urges') rather than mandatory verbs, this clause carries symbolic force: it encourages behavior but does not impose duties or authorize spending by the state.
Clerical instruction to distribute the resolution
This short administrative clause directs the Chief Clerk of the Assembly to transmit copies of the resolution to the author for appropriate distribution. In practice, that step enables the author’s office, tourism agencies, and partners to circulate the text to stakeholders, press, and local governments—effectively unlocking the resolution for use in promotional contexts even though it has no budgetary effect.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Economy across all five countries.
Explore Economy in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Small tourism-dependent businesses (hotels, restaurants, tours): They gain a legislative endorsement they can cite in marketing, grant applications, and local campaigns; the resolution explicitly notes that 89% of travel‑dependent businesses are small businesses.
- Visit California and local tourism bureaus: The resolution assembles official statistics and a legislative proclamation that these organizations can use to bolster statewide promotional campaigns and partner outreach.
- County and city economic development offices in fast‑growing tourism counties: Counties that saw 2024 spending growth can leverage the resolution to coordinate events or justify marketing expenditures to local stakeholders.
- Hospitality workforce and industry associations: The resolution spotlights job creation data (23,900 new jobs added in 2024), which associations can use in advocacy and recruitment messaging.
Who Bears the Cost
- State and local tourism offices (indirect cost): Any promotional activity triggered by the designation will have to be funded from existing budgets or through private partnerships because the resolution provides no new money.
- Author’s office and legislative clerks (administrative cost): Minimal staff time to distribute copies and support related stakeholder communications falls to the author’s office and the Assembly clerks.
- Local governments or chambers that plan events: Municipalities or nonprofit partners that choose to run observances may incur event and marketing costs without additional state funding.
- Businesses pressured to participate: Individual small businesses may feel social or peer pressure to join promotional activities, which can impose time and expense even if voluntary.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between symbolic promotion and practical action: the Legislature affirms tourism’s economic and social value and urges citizens to travel, but it stops short of committing funding or policy changes that would address the sector’s capacity constraints—leaving advocates with a statement of support but without new tools to fix underlying problems.
ACR 65 is symbolic: it packages statistics into a legislative endorsement without creating statutory rights, duties, or funding. That creates a familiar tradeoff—visibility and rhetorical support for tourism in exchange for no new resources to solve the sector’s structural problems (labor shortages, housing costs for workers, and infrastructure strain).
Stakeholders should expect a publicity asset rather than programmatic relief.
The resolution’s reliance on recent data strengthens its marketing value but raises questions about measurement and follow‑through. There is no requirement for an implementation plan, metrics, or after‑action reporting that would let policymakers gauge whether the proclamation increased in‑state travel or benefited disadvantaged counties.
Moreover, the inclusive language about welcoming visitors does not translate into accountability mechanisms around equity in tourism benefits; counties that lag behind the cited growth figures receive no targeted aid under this text.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.