SCR 94 is a ceremonial concurrent resolution that designates June 2025 as California Mountain Biking and Trail Stewardship Month. The resolution collects findings about mountain biking’s public-health and economic contributions, the variety of off‑road cycling disciplines, the role of youth interscholastic programs, and the work of trail stewardship nonprofits, then officially proclaims the month and directs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit copies to the author for distribution.
Although short and nonbinding, the resolution matters for practitioners because it formalizes state recognition that public lands, stewardship groups, and local economies play interlocking roles in outdoor recreation. Agencies, park managers, nonprofits, and tourism offices can use the designation to coordinate outreach, volunteer recruitment, and events — but the text contains no appropriation or regulatory changes, so any expanded activity will rely on existing resources and voluntary partnerships.
At a Glance
What It Does
SCR 94 formally declares the month of June 2025 as California Mountain Biking and Trail Stewardship Month and asks the Secretary of the Senate to transmit copies of the resolution to the author for distribution. It compiles a set of legislative findings about mountain biking’s social, environmental, and economic benefits.
Who It Affects
State and local park agencies, trail stewardship nonprofits (the resolution cites 80+ organizations), local tourism and economic-development entities, mountain biking businesses, and interscholastic youth biking programs. The measure does not impose regulatory duties on these actors.
Why It Matters
The designation provides a public-relations and coordination lever for stakeholders to promote volunteer days, safety and trail-care education, and tourism marketing. Because the resolution is ceremonial and contains no funding, its practical impact will depend on stakeholders’ willingness to allocate staff time and leverage existing programs.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SCR 94 opens with a series of 'whereas' clauses that assemble the legislature’s rationale for recognition. Those findings list the many disciplines within mountain biking (trail riding, cross country, cyclocross, downhill, enduro, gravel, bikepacking, BMX, freeride and others), recount the sport’s public‑health and youth-development benefits, and describe trail settings where mountain biking occurs — natural-surface trails, unpaved roads, and purpose‑built bike parks.
The preamble also highlights that interscholastic mountain biking began in California in the mid‑2000s and has grown into a widely adopted high‑school activity.
The resolution cites stewardship and partnership themes: it credits modern sustainable trail design with protecting resources and reducing fire risk, emphasizes that mountain bikers have been effective trail stewards, and points to over 80 bike‑friendly stewardship organizations in California that run volunteer dig days, clinics, and community events. SCR 94 also puts a number on the industry's statewide footprint, citing over $2.3 billion in annual spending, roughly 17,000 jobs, and $153 million in state and local taxes in 2017.On its face, the operative text is two short clauses: it proclaims June 2025 as California Mountain Biking and Trail Stewardship Month and instructs the Secretary of the Senate to send copies to the author for distribution.
The text includes a legislative-digest notation that no fiscal committee review was required, indicating the measure carries no appropriation or mandated state expenditures.Practically, the resolution creates recognition rather than regulatory change. Stakeholders can cite the designation when organizing National Trails Day (June 7), California State Parks Week (June 11–15), stewardship campaigns, fundraising, or tourism promotions.
However, the resolution does not create grant programs, change land-management rules, or require additional staffing; any follow-up activity will be undertaken through existing programs and voluntary partnerships.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The resolution formally proclaims June 2025 as California Mountain Biking and Trail Stewardship Month.
It lists specific mountain‑biking disciplines (including cross country, downhill, enduro, gravel, bikepacking, BMX and freeride) and notes interscholastic mountain biking began in California in the mid‑2000s.
SCR 94 cites economic figures: more than $2.3 billion in annual spending, about 17,000 jobs statewide, and $153 million in state and local taxes in 2017.
The text highlights over 80 bike‑friendly trail stewardship organizations in California and references common stewardship activities such as trail dig days, tune‑up clinics, and community events.
The resolution directs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit copies of the measure to the author for appropriate distribution; it contains no appropriation or new regulatory authority.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Findings on mountain biking, stewardship, and economic impact
This section compiles the legislature’s factual predicates: the range of mountain‑biking disciplines, public‑health and youth benefits, the setting of trails and bike parks, the role of sustainable trail design, and the claim that mountain biking contributes to ecosystem restoration and fire prevention. It also records industry economic data and the presence of 80+ stewardship organizations. For implementers, these findings are declarative rather than normative — they provide rationale for the proclamation and talking points for stakeholders but do not create enforceable obligations.
Official designation of June 2025
This single-line clause declares June 2025 as California Mountain Biking and Trail Stewardship Month. The designation is ceremonial: it signals legislative recognition and can be used as a convening instrument for events, outreach, and awareness campaigns by public and private actors, but it imposes no duties, mandates, or funding requirements on agencies or organizations.
Administrative transmission
The resolution directs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit copies of the resolution to the author for distribution. That administrative step is the only concrete action the resolution requires of the legislature’s staff; it does not direct state agencies to take programmatic steps or to report back to the Legislature.
Fiscal and legal effect
The digest notes 'Fiscal Committee: NO,' reflecting that the resolution carries no appropriation and was not referred for fiscal review. Legally, concurrent resolutions of this type are expressions of sentiment and carry no force to change statutes, issue regulatory directives, or create funding streams. Stakeholders should treat the measure as a public recognition tool rather than a source of new legal obligations or revenue.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Trail stewardship nonprofits and volunteer groups — The designation raises public visibility for their volunteer events (dig days, clinics), which can boost recruitment, donations, and local partnerships.
- State and local parks agencies — Agencies get a legislative hook to promote stewardship campaigns and coordinate National Trails Day and State Parks Week activities without needing new legislation.
- Mountain biking industry and local tourism economies — Businesses and tourism bureaus can leverage the month for marketing campaigns aimed at attracting riders and supporting bike‑friendly tourism, potentially increasing local spending.
- Interscholastic and youth biking programs — The resolution spotlights youth participation and can be used by schools and leagues to attract participants and community support.
- Outdoor‑recreation educators and safety trainers — The month provides a focal point for safety outreach and trail etiquette education targeted to diverse user groups.
Who Bears the Cost
- State and local parks departments — If agencies choose to run events tied to the designation, they will likely absorb staff time and operating costs from existing budgets because the resolution provides no new funding.
- Trail stewardship nonprofits — Increased attention may raise expectations for expanded programming and maintenance that require more volunteer coordination and fundraising.
- Local governments and tourism offices — Promotional campaigns and event infrastructure (permits, signage, sanitation) may create incremental costs borne at the city or county level.
- Land managers and resource agencies — Higher user numbers during promotional efforts can increase wear on trails and pressure on natural resources, shifting maintenance burdens onto land managers without mandated funding.
- Event organizers and small businesses — To capitalize on the month, businesses may invest in marketing or event production costs that are not offset by state support.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances celebration and promotion of mountain biking with little to no investment in the management capacity needed to handle growth: it invites increased participation and economic activity while relying on voluntary groups and existing agency resources to prevent environmental degradation and maintain trails.
The resolution’s central limitation is its ceremonial character: it recognizes and encourages but does not fund or mandate. That creates an implementation gap between expectation and resourcing — stakeholders may be encouraged to scale up stewardship or promotional activities without corresponding public investment, which can strain volunteers and agency staff.
The economic figures cited in the preamble bolster the argument for recognition, but at least one data point (state and local taxes in 2017) is dated and may overstate current fiscal contributions without updated context.
Another tension concerns recreational access versus resource protection. The resolution promotes increased participation and tourism as potential economic revitalizers, yet it contains no guidance on carrying capacity, equitable access for underrepresented communities, or protections for sensitive habitats.
Increased visibility can drive greater trail use, which, absent coordinated funding for maintenance and ecological safeguards, risks degraded trails and conflicts among user groups. Finally, the resolution assumes stewardship nonprofits are both willing and able to absorb additional demand; capacity across those organizations varies greatly by region, leaving rural and urban areas to shoulder uneven impacts.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.