SB60 forbids public campuses from charging mandatory systemwide tuition and fees to several defined groups: certain military dependents (including children of veterans with service‑connected disabilities or who were killed), dependents and surviving spouses of California National Guard members killed or disabled in state active service, undergraduate Medal of Honor recipients or eligible children, and qualifying current or former foster youth. The bill also extends those waivers to extended‑education courses that count toward an undergraduate degree at the California State University and, subject to Regents approval, the University of California.
The measure matters because it targets tuition barriers for narrowly defined low‑income, military‑connected, and foster populations, but it attaches income, residency, academic‑standing, and program‑duration limits and gives the Department of Veterans Affairs a role in eligibility decisions. The result is increased access for eligible students alongside new verification and revenue‑allocation challenges for public segments and state agencies.
At a Glance
What It Does
Requires California Community Colleges, California State University campuses, and (subject to Regents’ action) University of California campuses to waive mandatory systemwide tuition and fees for enumerated military‑connected dependents and surviving spouses, Medal of Honor‑linked students meeting income and residency tests, and (for CSU and UC if Regents agree) students taking extended‑education courses that satisfy an undergraduate degree requirement. It separately creates a fee waiver for eligible current or former foster youth at UC and CSU with academic and financial‑need conditions.
Who It Affects
Public higher‑education segments (CCCs, CSU, and potentially UC), current and former foster youth aged 25 or younger who meet foster‑care and Cal Grant A financial‑need criteria, various categories of military dependents and surviving spouses, Medal of Honor recipients’ children under age 27, and the Department of Veterans Affairs (which may determine some eligibility).
Why It Matters
The bill narrows the pool of students who must pay mandatory systemwide fees, shifting costs away from individual eligible students and onto institutions and the state. It also expands fee relief into extended‑education coursework and assigns administrative roles (DVA determinations, campus verification) that will affect implementation and budget planning.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SB60 creates a package of targeted fee waivers. For military‑connected groups it bars campuses from charging mandatory systemwide tuition and fees (explicitly listing enrollment, registration, differential, and incidental fees) to certain dependents and surviving spouses: those eligible under Article 2 of the Military and Veterans Code, children of veterans who were killed or who have service‑connected disabilities if the child’s household income falls below the state poverty level, and dependents or surviving spouses of California National Guard members killed or permanently disabled while on state active service.
For some categories — notably the child of a veteran who meets the income test and Medal of Honor‑linked applicants — the Department of Veterans Affairs may make eligibility determinations.
The bill separately provides a waiver for current or former foster youth at UC and CSU that meet tight conditions: be 25 or younger, have spent at least 12 consecutive months in foster care after age 10, meet one of three placement/adoption/guardianship criteria, submit a FAFSA, maintain minimum academic standing as set by the campus, and meet Cal Grant A financial‑need thresholds. That foster‑youth waiver is limited to the equivalent of four years of undergraduate attendance and must be reduced by any other state or federal aid the student receives during the same academic period.SB60 requires residency in California under existing statutory rules for all waivers and defines the “state poverty level” by reference to the income amount calculated for a single person with no dependents under the Taxation Code.
It also contains an exclusion for a particular veteran‑dependent category and a special rule that the University of California is only bound to the extent the Regents adopt a resolution making the provision applicable, which creates a variable statewide footprint. Finally, the bill applies the waiver to extended‑education courses at CSU and UC (subject to Regents) only when the course is used to meet undergraduate degree requirements, bringing continuing‑education classes into the relief framework but tying eligibility to degree relevance.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The waiver explicitly covers mandatory systemwide tuition and fees — including enrollment, registration, differential, and incidental fees — rather than every charge a campus might impose.
Children of veterans killed in service or with service‑connected disabilities qualify only if their annual household income (including parental support) is below the state poverty level, and the Department of Veterans Affairs may decide eligibility for that group.
The foster‑youth waiver applies only at UC and CSU, requires FAFSA completion, a campus‑determined minimum GPA or good‑standing standard, meets Cal Grant A financial‑need rules, and is limited to the equivalent of four undergraduate years.
SB60 reduces the amount of any waiver by other state or federal financial aid (scholarships, grants) the student receives in the same academic year or term.
The University of California is not automatically bound: the UC Regents must adopt a resolution to make the section applicable at UC campuses, producing a potential patchwork between CSU, CCC, and UC.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Fee waivers for military dependents, Medal of Honor families, and Guard casualties
This subsection lists the military‑connected beneficiaries who may not be charged mandatory systemwide fees: dependents eligible under Article 2 of the Military and Veterans Code, qualifying children of veterans with service‑connected disabilities or who were killed (subject to an income ceiling), dependents or surviving spouses of California National Guard members killed or permanently disabled in state active service, and undergraduate Medal of Honor recipients or children of recipients under age 27 meeting residency and income tests. It also specifically gives the Department of Veterans Affairs authority to determine eligibility in at least two of these categories, shifting the evidentiary and verification workload to DVA.
Targeted foster‑youth waiver with eligibility and duration limits
This paragraph creates a UC/CSU‑level fee waiver for current or former foster youth who are 25 or younger and who spent at least 12 consecutive months in foster care after age 10, with narrow placement/exit conditions (current court order, order at age 18, or adoption/guardianship from foster care). It requires FAFSA submission, campus good‑standing (GPA) standards, and adherence to Cal Grant A financial‑need rules, limits the waiver to the equivalent of four years of undergraduate attendance, and mandates that the waiver be offset by other state or federal aid.
Annual, prospective waiver eligibility only
Subdivision (c) permits eligible people to receive a waiver for each academic year in which they apply, but bars retroactive waivers for prior academic years. Practically, students and institutions must re‑verify eligibility each year and cannot seek refunds for previously paid fees under this statute.
Income and residency gates
The bill defines “state poverty level” by pointing to the Taxation Code figure for a single person with no dependents, which is the income test used for some veteran‑linked categories. It also makes fee relief contingent on a California residency determination under existing statutory residency rules, meaning students who cannot establish state residency remain ineligible.
Specific exclusion of a veteran‑dependent category
Subdivision (f) carves out an explicit exclusion: it says subdivision (a) does not apply to a dependent of a veteran as defined in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 890 of the Military and Veterans Code. That narrowing creates an intra‑category differentiation among dependents and can cause eligibility complexity in practice.
Extended‑education courses eligible when they count toward a degree
This provision requires UC and CSU campuses (CCC is not named here) to waive tuition and fees for students who enroll in extended‑education courses when two conditions are met: the student qualifies under the relevant criteria from subdivision (a), and the extended‑education course is used to satisfy an undergraduate degree requirement. The change brings continuing‑education offerings into the waiver regime but ties relief to degree applicability rather than blanket continuing‑education enrollment.
UC applicability contingent on Regents' resolution
The final subsection states the section does not apply to the University of California except to the extent the Regents adopt a resolution making it applicable. That gives the UC system discretion to opt in or limit application, which preserves Regents’ control over fees but also risks inconsistent coverage between segments and campuses.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Education across all five countries.
Explore Education in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Low‑income children of veterans who died or have service‑connected disabilities — they receive waivers if household income is below the state poverty level, removing mandatory systemwide fees that can be a material barrier.
- Current and former foster youth aged 25 or younger who meet the foster‑care duration and placement criteria — they gain up to four years of fee relief, provided they satisfy FAFSA, campus good‑standing, and Cal Grant A need tests.
- Dependents and surviving spouses of California National Guard members killed or permanently disabled on state active service — they qualify for fee relief at public campuses included in subdivision (a).
- Undergraduate Medal of Honor recipients and eligible children under 27 who meet residency and income tests — they receive fee waivers with DVA verification for some cases.
- Students using extended‑education courses to satisfy degree requirements at CSU (and UC if Regents adopt) — these students can avoid paying mandatory systemwide fees for qualifying continued‑education classes that are degree‑applicable.
Who Bears the Cost
- California State University and University of California campuses — will forego mandatory systemwide fee revenue for eligible students and face additional administrative work to verify eligibility, adjust billing, and track reductions by other aid.
- State budgets and potentially campus budgets — since campuses lose fee income for covered students, the state or segments may need to identify replacement funding or reallocate resources to cover instruction and support formerly funded by fees.
- Department of Veterans Affairs — DVA is tasked with eligibility determinations for some veteran‑linked groups, increasing its administrative burden and requiring it to coordinate with campuses.
- Financial‑aid offices and registrars at public campuses — responsible for FAFSA verification, residency determinations, academic standing checks, and ongoing compliance, which will require systems and staff time.
- Students who do not meet narrow eligibility criteria — because waivers are targeted and income‑gated, other low‑income or military‑connected students may remain obligated for fees, shifting political and financial pressure onto campuses.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between expanding targeted fee relief to remove financial barriers for specific vulnerable populations and preserving institutional revenue and administrative simplicity: broader waivers increase access but reduce fee income and raise verification costs, while narrow, conditional waivers protect budgets but risk excluding students who need help because of rigid income definitions, residency rules, or bureaucratic timing.
SB60 concentrates relief on narrowly defined groups but builds several gates that limit practical access. The income test uses the Taxation Code’s single‑person poverty amount; that choice can exclude households with dependents who nonetheless struggle to pay college costs because the metric ignores household size.
Tying some eligibility decisions to the Department of Veterans Affairs centralizes determinations but creates an interagency dependency: campuses will rely on external certifications while DVA must develop intake, verification, and appeal processes. The foster‑youth waiver layers FAFSA, Cal Grant A need testing, and campus good‑standing requirements, which can create timing mismatches (FAFSA cycles, Cal Grant certifications) and administrative friction for students exiting unstable placements.
Those procedural requirements increase the risk that eligible students fail to access relief because of paperwork or timing rather than substantive ineligibility.
Program design also creates fiscal and coverage frictions. Waivers are reduced by other state or federal aid, which avoids double‑counting but can make the net benefit small if students already receive grants or scholarships; the four‑year cap on foster‑youth waivers and the prohibition on retroactive refunds mean relief is prospective and time‑limited.
The University of California opt‑in rule preserves system autonomy but produces potential statewide inconsistency: students at a CSU campus may get a waiver while their peers at UC do not unless the Regents act, complicating outreach and financial planning. Finally, allowing extended‑education courses to qualify only when they meet degree requirements minimizes abuse but forces gatekeeper judgments about course applicability that will vary across campuses and majors.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.