HCR 5 adds a new rule, LAC 76:VII.363(A)(4), giving the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries authority to issue special permits that allow registered participants in certain tournaments or rodeos to take red drum larger than the current 27‑inch regulatory size limit. The resolution sets three eligibility conditions for events — five or more years running, a historical bull red category, and no more than four days once per year — and directs the state register to publish the amendment in the Louisiana Administrative Code.
This change creates a narrowly scoped exception intended to preserve long‑standing recreational events and their economic and cultural benefits while leaving the department with discretionary control. Practically, it shifts management risk into an administrative permitting process and raises questions about monitoring, enforcement, and how tournament harvest will be accounted for in ongoing stock‑recovery evaluations.
At a Glance
What It Does
The resolution enacts LAC 76:VII.363(A)(4), authorizing the department secretary to issue special permits that allow registered tournament participants to take red drum exceeding the 27‑inch total‑length regulatory limit. Permits are issued upon request to eligible applicants and apply only to registered participants in the covered event.
Who It Affects
Tournament and rodeo organizers that have run bull red categories for at least five years, recreational anglers who enter those events, the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries (which gains discretionary permitting duties), and enforcement officers who must police the permit exception during events.
Why It Matters
The measure creates a formal administrative carve‑out from a statewide size and possession prohibition, preserving established events while embedding harvesting exceptions into the administrative code. For managers and compliance officers it establishes a new permit regime without specifying application criteria, monitoring, or reporting requirements.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Louisiana currently sets the maximum legal take for red drum at 27 inches total length and prohibits possession of fish larger than that size. This resolution inserts a new subsection into the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries regulations that creates a narrow, permit‑based exception.
Under the new provision, the department secretary may grant special permits to an eligible applicant that allow registered participants in a qualifying tournament or rodeo to take red drum larger than the 27‑inch limit during the event.
The bill ties the permit to events that meet three conditions: the event has been held regularly for at least five years, it has historically offered a bull red category, and it runs no longer than four days once each year. The text authorizes permit issuance "upon the request of an eligible applicant," which on its face appears to leave the department discretion over issuance but does not spell out supporting documentation, quotas, fees, monitoring, reporting obligations, or specific enforcement mechanisms tied to the permit.Because the resolution is drafted to be printed into the Louisiana Administrative Code, the exception becomes part of the department's regulatory framework rather than a one‑off statutory directive.
The preamble explains that department stock projections anticipate meeting recovery goals even if these limited tournament takes continue, and the rule therefore aims to reconcile conservation objectives with longstanding recreational tradition and economic impacts from tournaments.What the text does not do is prescribe operational detail. It does not require participant reporting of takes, set a numerical limit on the number of bull red taken under a permit, establish permit terms or renewal conditions, or add data‑collection requirements to assess the biological impact.
Those implementation choices will fall to the department unless later supplemented by additional rulemaking or administrative guidance.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The resolution adds LAC 76:VII.363(A)(4), authorizing the secretary to issue special permits allowing red drum to be taken in excess of the 27‑inch size limit by registered tournament participants.
An event is eligible only if it has been held regularly for five years or more.
An event must have historically included a bull red category to qualify.
Eligible events are limited to once per year and may be no longer than four days.
The permit authority is granted "upon the request of an eligible applicant," but the provision contains no application standards, reporting, harvest caps, or monitoring requirements.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Findings framing the exception
The resolution includes findings that restate existing department size and possession limits (27 inches) and the purpose of those limits (stock recovery). The preamble asserts the department's expectation that allowing certain tournament bull red categories will not prevent meeting management goals, and it frames the amendment as a balance between recovery and preservation of long‑standing recreational events. Practically, the preamble supplies the policy rationale the legislature used to justify the regulatory exception.
Secretary may issue special permits for bull red tournament harvest
This is the operative language that creates the permit authority. It lets the department secretary, after receiving a request from an eligible applicant, issue a special permit allowing registered participants to take red drum exceeding the regulatory size limit. The text confines the exception to participants in a registered tournament or rodeo that meets the eligibility criteria, but it does not include procedural detail such as the contents of an application, timelines for decision, permit conditions, or monitoring obligations.
Three concrete eligibility conditions for events
The amendment lists three discrete prerequisites: (a) the event must have been held regularly for at least five years; (b) the event must historically have included a bull red category; and (c) the event must be run no longer than four days and only once per year. These conditions narrow the ordinance to established events and exclude festivals, new contests, or multi‑stage circuits, but they do not define terms like "held regularly" or "historically," leaving room for administrative interpretation.
Printing the amendment in the Louisiana Administrative Code
The resolution directs the office of the state register to print and incorporate the new subsection into the Louisiana Administrative Code. That step makes the change part of the state's codified regulations; however, the resolution does not create implementing guidance or operational rules, and it does not attach a sunset, review trigger, or explicit data collection mandate tied to the newly authorized permits.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Long‑standing tournament and rodeo organizers — The amendment preserves the ability of events that meet the eligibility tests to continue offering bull red categories, protecting cultural traditions and the events' primary competitive draws.
- Registered tournament anglers — Participants in qualifying events regain the chance to compete for bull red categories without running afoul of the general 27‑inch possession rule during the permitted event.
- Local economies and tourism businesses — Events that include bull red categories often generate hotel, restaurant, and retail revenue; preserving those categories helps sustain those economic benefits.
- The department (in a managerial sense) — The department obtains a discrete administrative tool to accommodate socioeconomically important events without changing baseline size limits statewide.
Who Bears the Cost
- Department of Wildlife and Fisheries — The department assumes responsibility for permit decisions and any indirect monitoring or enforcement costs, yet the bill provides no additional resources or procedural guidance.
- Enforcement officers and wardens — Law enforcement must distinguish between permitted tournament take and prohibited possession outside events, increasing on‑the‑ground complexity during and around events.
- Fisheries scientists and managers — Without mandatory reporting or harvest caps in the text, scientists may face gaps in data needed to quantify tournament impacts on local stocks.
- Conservation organizations and anglers concerned with stock protection — These stakeholders bear the biological risk of localized overharvest and may face reduced protections where exceptions are authorized.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances protecting established cultural and economic uses — long‑running bull red tournament traditions — against the precautionary principle of fisheries management: allowing any exception to a strict size and possession limit risks localized biological harm and creates enforcement and data‑collection challenges that could undercut the very stock recovery the size limit was designed to secure.
The resolution creates a narrow but potentially consequential administrative carve‑out from a statewide size and possession prohibition without prescribing operational guardrails. It delegates substantial discretion to the department secretary to decide whether to issue permits, but it omits key implementation details: what documentation an applicant must submit, any numerical or temporal limits on permitted takes beyond the event duration, monitoring or reporting requirements, permit fees, and revocation procedures.
Absent those details, the permit becomes a blunt tool whose biological impacts will be hard to measure.
Enforcement presents a practical difficulty. Officers will need to verify participant registration and whether a particular fish was taken under a tournament permit versus recreationally taken outside the event period.
The lack of mandated reporting or mandatory observer coverage increases the risk that permitted takes will not be tracked in stock assessments, undermining the preamble's premise that recovery goals will still be met. Finally, the eligibility terms ("held regularly," "historically included") invite administrative interpretation and potential disputes over which events qualify, creating opportunities for inconsistent application across regions.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.