This bill narrows the Department of Natural Resources’ regulatory options for recreational striped bass by barring a catch-and-release season and directing the Department to establish defined summer/fall and trophy seasons each year. It also adds a procedural requirement that the Department produce and transmit an economic impact statement for fisheries regulations it identifies as having a major impact on stakeholders.
Why it matters: the measure shifts decisionmaking from adaptive, agency-led rulemaking toward statutorily prescriptive seasons and formalized pre-publication economic review. That changes how Maryland manages an interstate, economically important fishery and alters the toolkit available to fisheries managers during population fluctuations.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill prevents the Department of Natural Resources from adopting a catch-and-release–only season for striped bass and directs the Department to set annual recreational, charter, and trophy seasons under specified constraints. It also requires the Department to prepare an economic impact statement for any proposed fisheries regulation it deems to have a major stakeholder impact and to submit that statement to legislative and administrative reviewers before publication.
Who It Affects
Recreational anglers, charter-boat operators, and bait-and-tackle suppliers will face new season structure and gear constraints; the Department of Natural Resources loses some regulatory flexibility. Legislative and oversight offices (the General Assembly’s committee, Department of Legislative Services, and the Administrator) gain a formal review role on high-impact fisheries rules.
Why It Matters
Striped bass is managed through interstate coordination and supports tourism and charter businesses; prescribing seasons and adding pre-publication economic review changes timing and substance of management responses to stock condition and stakeholder concerns. Practitioners—compliance officers, charter operators, and regulators—should note the procedural workload and the narrower set of regulatory options authorized for DNR.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill adds a new statutory subsection to the Natural Resources Article that removes catch-and-release as an allowable seasonal regime for striped bass, instead directing the Department to adopt two categories of harvest seasons each year: a summer/fall season and a separate trophy season. For the summer/fall recreational season the text imposes a single-fish daily possession limit for recreational anglers and allows the use of shad or shad-mimicking artificial lures of any size.
For charter vessels the bill sets a two-fish-per-person daily possession limit, caps the number of lines in the water at 12 per boat, limits planer boards to 75 feet on either side, and caps on-board spot-fish bait at 75 per person.
The trophy season is carved out as short, tightly constrained windows for targeting larger fish. For 2026 the bill prescribes three specific three-day windows in April and May; beginning in 2027 the statute requires two three-day periods in late April and one additional three-day period in late April or early May each year.
The trophy season carries a 28-inch minimum size limit and restricts bait during those windows to shad or shad-like lures at least 9 inches long and forbids more than one trailer hook per lure.Separately, the bill amends the State Government Article to add a procedural obligation: when the Department identifies proposed fisheries regulations that it determines will have a major impact on interested stakeholders, the Department must prepare an economic impact statement and deliver it to the legislative committee, the Department of Legislative Services, and the Administrator at least 15 days before the proposed regulation is filed for publication in the Maryland Register. Finally, the act declares itself an emergency measure, making the provisions effective immediately upon enactment, which accelerates any operational or enforcement consequences for managers and regulated parties.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The recreational summer/fall striped bass season is statutorily tied to an annual schedule that includes specific gear and possession limits for recreational anglers and charter boats.
Recreational anglers may possess no more than one striped bass per day; charter-boat clients may possess up to two per person per day and boats are limited to 12 lines in the water.
The statute establishes 2026 trophy-season dates as three separate three-day windows in April–May and, starting in 2027, requires two 3‑day late‑April periods plus one 3‑day late‑April/early‑May period each year.
During trophy season the bill sets a 28‑inch minimum size for retained striped bass and limits allowable bait to shad or shad-like lures at least 9 inches long with no more than one trailer hook.
For any fisheries regulation the Department identifies as having a 'major impact' on stakeholders, the Department must complete and submit an economic impact statement to the legislative committee, DLS, and the Administrator at least 15 days before publication in the Maryland Register.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Prohibition on a Catch-and-Release–Only Season
Subsection (A) states plainly that the Department may not establish a catch-and-release season for striped bass. Practically, this removes one management tool from DNR’s regulatory toolkit: during times of low abundance or high mortality risk, the agency can no longer respond by switching to a catch-and-release–only regime under state law. That constraint will be binding on future emergency or temporary actions unless the statute is amended.
Summer and Fall Recreational and Charter Season Framework
Subsection (B) directs the Department to annually establish summer and fall seasons and imposes operational limits. For shore- and private-boat recreational anglers the statute sets a one-fish daily possession limit and broadly authorizes shad or shad‑mimicking artificial lures of any size as bait. For charter operations the provision increases the per‑person limit to two fish, caps lines per boat at 12, restricts planer board extension to 75 feet per side, and limits on‑board spot‑fish bait to 75 per person. These are prescriptive gear and possession controls that charter captains and compliance managers must operationalize in trip planning, manifesting, and crew/inmate briefings.
Trophy-Season Dates and Size/Bait Restrictions
Subsection (C) creates a short trophy season targeted at larger fish. The statute sets concrete 2026 dates (three distinct three‑day windows across April and early May) and, from 2027 forward, requires two consecutive 3‑day windows in late April plus a third 3‑day window in late April or early May. It imposes a 28‑inch minimum retention size during trophy windows and forbids shad or shad‑mimicking lures shorter than 9 inches or lures with more than one trailer hook. Those bait and tackle constraints are specific enough to affect supply chains (bigger artificial lures) and enforcement practices (measuring fish and inspecting terminal tackle).
Economic Impact Statement for Major-Impact Fisheries Regulations
The bill adds subsection (b–1) to require the Department to complete an economic impact statement for any proposed fisheries regulation it identifies as having a major impact on interested stakeholders and to submit that statement to the General Assembly’s committee, the Department of Legislative Services, and the Administrator at least 15 days before the regulation is filed for publication in the Maryland Register. This creates an extra procedural review layer and a short pre-publication window that can influence regulatory timing and stakeholder engagement practices.
Immediate Effect
The act declares itself an emergency measure effective upon enactment. That accelerates compliance and enforcement timelines and means the Department and regulated parties must be prepared to operationalize new seasons, bag and gear limits, and procedural obligations without the delay that typically accompanies standard effective-dates—placing a premium on rapid guidance, communications, and potential fiscal adjustments.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Harvest-oriented recreational anglers: The statutory ban on a catch-and-release season and the codified summer/fall and trophy windows increase predictability for anglers who prefer to retain fish and plan trips around guaranteed retention opportunities.
- Charter-boat operators targeting retained harvests: The two-fish per-person limit and clear gear rules provide a predictable regulatory environment for trip planning and marketing—operators can structure trips around allowable retention and gear limits.
- Trophy anglers and tournament organizers: Short, focused trophy windows with a 28‑inch minimum create targeted opportunities to pursue larger fish, which can support niche tourism and tournament scheduling.
- Manufacturers and suppliers of larger lures and shad-sized baits: The 9‑inch minimum bait/lure restriction during trophy windows favors suppliers of larger lures and may increase demand for bigger artificial baits and appropriately sized shad.
Who Bears the Cost
- Department of Natural Resources: Statutory constraints reduce regulatory flexibility to respond to ecological signals and may force the agency to implement suboptimal conservation measures; the Department also bears the administrative burden and cost of preparing economic impact statements on major-impact fisheries rules.
- Fisheries scientists and conservation managers: Removing catch-and-release as a management option and prescribing fixed trophy windows can limit adaptive responses to stock assessments and complicate interstate coordination under ASMFC frameworks.
- Smaller bait suppliers and recreational anglers during trophy windows: The 9‑inch minimum bait requirement may reduce availability of legal live bait and raise costs for anglers and smaller suppliers who do not stock larger baits.
- Enforcement agencies and charter operators: New gear limits (line counts, planer board distances, trailer‑hook restrictions) increase inspection complexity; enforcement officers and charter captains must measure, monitor, and document compliance more frequently.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The statute forces a choice between legal certainty for harvest and predictable seasons versus adaptive, science-driven fisheries management: it gives stakeholders predictable access but limits the agency’s ability to protect the stock rapidly when scientific indicators warrant emergency or precautionary measures.
The bill embeds a core trade-off between predictability for harvest-oriented stakeholders and the nimbleness managers need for stock protection. By statutorily banning a catch-and-release season and defining trophy windows in statute, the General Assembly narrows DNR’s ability to respond quickly to updated stock assessments, environmental shocks (heat, hypoxia), or interstate conservation directives from the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission.
That loss of administrative discretion may accelerate conflict when DNR’s science advises a different regulatory posture than the statute allows.
The economic-impact requirement adds transparency and a formal review step, but it creates timing and definitional questions. The phrase 'major impact on interested stakeholders' is not defined in the bill, leaving room for dispute over what triggers the statement.
The 15‑day pre‑publication window is short and likely insufficient for substantive stakeholder review in complex fisheries actions; it is also coupled with an emergency effective date that can compress implementation timelines. Finally, bait-size and trailer-hook restrictions intended to target trophy catch methods could produce unintended consequences—reducing survival of released fish if anglers retain larger fish less selectively, or driving anglers to different gears that have other ecological effects.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.