Codify — Article

Maryland SB879 allows Sunday bow hunting and shrinks archery safety zone in Baltimore City

Gives DNR discretion to permit Sunday deer bow hunting in Baltimore City and reduces archery safety buffer from 150 to 50 yards near occupied buildings — a change with enforcement and community-safety implications.

The Brief

SB879 amends Maryland’s Natural Resources Article to let the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) authorize deer hunting on every Sunday of the deer bow hunting season in Baltimore City. It also adds Baltimore City to the list of jurisdictions where the statutory “safety zone” for archery hunters is 50 yards from occupied buildings instead of the general 150–yard rule.

The bill is procedural in form — it expands DNR’s discretionary permission to include an urban jurisdiction and narrows the distance archers must keep from occupied structures. That combination changes how urban deer management and public-safety rules apply inside Baltimore City and creates implementation and enforcement questions for DNR, city officials, landowners, and nearby residents.

At a Glance

What It Does

The bill gives the Department of Natural Resources discretion to allow deer hunting on each Sunday of the deer bow hunting season specifically in Baltimore City, and it reduces the archery safety zone from 150 yards to 50 yards around occupied buildings in Baltimore City for archery hunters. It also updates a cross-reference related to regulated shooting-ground permits.

Who It Affects

Primary actors are Baltimore City archery and bow hunters, the Department of Natural Resources (which must implement and regulate the change), property owners and occupants in areas where urban hunting might occur, and local law enforcement and parks or land managers who may handle complaints or enforcement.

Why It Matters

This is a targeted urban carve‑in to a statute that has primarily governed rural and suburban counties. Practically, the bill makes Sunday bow hunting a regulatory option in a dense jurisdiction and reduces the physical buffer for archers — both of which alter risk profiles, the scope of DNR permitting decisions, and local engagement needed for safe implementation.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

SB879 inserts Baltimore City into two existing provisions of the Maryland Natural Resources Article. First, it adds a clause authorizing the Department of Natural Resources to allow deer hunting on each Sunday of the deer bow hunting season in Baltimore City.

That authority is discretionary — the Department ‘‘may allow’’ Sunday hunting — not mandatory, so DNR retains the ability to set conditions, time windows, and places where Sunday bow hunting is permitted. The statutory insertion parallels existing county-specific carve-outs that already create a patchwork of Sunday‑hunting rules across the State.

Second, the bill modifies the safety‑zone provision for archery hunters by listing Baltimore City among the jurisdictions where the safety zone extends only 50 yards from an occupied dwelling, church, or similar structure, rather than the general 150‑yard safety zone that applies to most weapons and locations. The change applies to archery hunters only; other subsections preserving wider buffers for firearms remain untouched.The bill also updates the cross-reference in the regulated shooting ground permit section to reflect the added Sunday‑hunting authorization, preserving the existing administrative pathway that lets a shooting‑ground applicant request Sunday hunting as part of a permit.

Because the bill is limited in scope — it neither creates an automatic right to hunt on Sundays nor alters hunting prohibitions for state parks or other expressly off‑limits public lands — most practical effects will flow from how DNR exercises the new authority and how it conditions or maps allowable Sunday bow hunting inside a built environment.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

SB879 adds Baltimore City to §10‑410(a): DNR may allow a person to hunt deer on each Sunday of the deer bow hunting season in Baltimore City (DNR discretion, not an entitlement).

2

The bill amends §10‑410(g)(3)(i) so that for archery hunters in Baltimore City the statutory safety zone around an occupied dwelling, church, or camp is 50 yards instead of the standard 150 yards.

3

SB879 updates §10‑906(b)(3)(i) cross‑reference language used in regulated shooting ground permit applications so applicants can request Sunday hunting consistent with the amended §10‑410 provisions.

4

The change applies only to the deer bow hunting season’s Sundays; it does not alter the broader prohibitions that keep Sunday hunting off State park lands or other enumerated locations unless DNR separately authorizes it.

5

The bill takes effect July 1, 2026 — implementation and any DNR rules or permit conditions must follow that effective date.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 1 — Amendment to §10‑410(a)

Gives DNR discretion to authorize Sunday bow hunting in Baltimore City

This provision inserts a new numbered clause into the existing list of jurisdictions where the Department may allow Sunday hunting. Practically, it does not mandate Sunday hunting in Baltimore City; it gives DNR explicit statutory ability to permit deer hunting on each Sunday of the bow season there. That preserves DNR’s rulemaking and permitting role — the agency can impose time windows, limit locations, require hunter registration or safety briefings, and set other conditions before authorizing Sunday activity inside city limits.

Section 1 — Amendment to §10‑410(g)(3)(i)

Reduces archery safety zone to 50 yards around occupied buildings in Baltimore City

This change adds Baltimore City to the narrower safety‑zone list that already applies in several counties. For archery hunters only, the safety zone measured from occupied dwellings, churches, or camps becomes 50 yards, not the larger 150‑yard buffer in the general rule. The practical effect is to permit archers to discharge arrows closer to buildings than previously allowed, which shifts the risk calculus for hunters, nearby residents, and landowners.

Section 1 — Amendment to §10‑906(b)(3)(i)

Keeps regulated shooting‑ground permit language aligned with new Sunday‑hunting authority

The bill adjusts the cross‑reference in the regulated shooting‑ground permit application clause so an applicant may still apply for authorization to allow Sunday hunting consistent with the newly amended §10‑410. This is an administrative housekeeping change that preserves the existing permit pathway for regulated shooting grounds and ensures applicants in Baltimore City can seek Sunday permissions as part of the usual permit process.

1 more section
Section 2 — Effective date

When the amendments become law

The bill sets the effective date to July 1, 2026. That means DNR may not lawfully exercise the new Sunday‑hunting authorization or apply the altered archery safety zone in Baltimore City until that date; any regulatory or permitting changes should be timed to allow outreach and rule adjustments before July 1 if DNR plans to permit Sunday activity promptly.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.

Explore Environment in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Baltimore City bow and archery hunters — they gain the possibility of Sunday hunting during the deer bow season and a reduced safety buffer that can open more urban parcels to archery hunting under DNR authorization.
  • DNR and urban deer‑management programs — the added statutory tools let the agency use Sunday bow hunting as one management option in an urban context, which may help control deer populations in localized problem areas.
  • Landowners and property managers who consent to hunting on their land — the reduced safety zone and Sunday permission increase the situations where landowners can allow archery deer control on weekends, potentially aiding nuisance or damage mitigation efforts.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Residents and occupants near permitted hunting areas in Baltimore City — reduced safety distances and added Sunday activity increase perceived and real safety and nuisance risks, and residents may need to negotiate permission or protective measures with hunters or landowners.
  • Local law enforcement and DNR enforcement staff — narrower safety zones in an urban environment create more complaints, require clearer mapping, and place operational burdens on enforcement resources to monitor compliance and investigate incidents.
  • Municipal parks, schools, and institutions adjacent to potential hunting zones — while State park prohibitions remain, other public or quasi‑public parcels may be affected if DNR authorizes Sunday bow hunting nearby, requiring coordination or exclusion requests from local authorities.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central dilemma is between expanding tools for urban deer management and protecting public safety and the sense of security for city residents. Allowing Sunday bow hunting and narrowing archery buffers increases the agency’s ability to address deer issues, but it simultaneously concentrates risk in populated areas where the margin for error — and the political and practical costs of mistakes — is much smaller.

Two implementation challenges stand out. First, mapping and communicating where Sunday bow hunting may be allowed inside a dense urban grid is nontrivial.

The statutory changes are permissional, not permissive by default: DNR must define permitted parcels, create notice procedures for nearby occupants, and reconcile State rules with municipal land uses. Without clear maps, permit conditions, and public outreach, the reduced 50‑yard buffer could produce confusion about what is lawful and risky.

Second, the reduced safety zone applies only to archery, leaving the larger buffers for firearms intact; that technical distinction creates enforcement complexity. Officers and DNR staff will need training and clear operational guidance to determine whether an incident involves archery within a 50‑yard permitted area or an illegal discharge of another weapon.

Insurance, liability exposure for landowners who grant permission, and potential conflicts with local ordinances or institutional land‑use policies (schools, hospitals, public housing) are unresolved practical questions the statute does not address.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.