This bill (A10247) amends the Excelsior research and development tax credit so that a participant in the Excelsior Jobs Program can claim a state credit based on the full-cost measure of the participant's R&D expenditures attributable to activities conducted in New York. The amendment preserves project-specific percentage caps and creates an exception limiting state relief where a taxpayer already claims a federal R&D credit calculated on a full-cost basis.
Why it matters: the change alters the state calculation anchor for a valuable R&D incentive, which can increase the credit available to some firms while creating new coordination and documentation obligations for tax and finance teams. It also introduces a specific fallback for expired federal rules and confirms that qualifying R&D expenditures may be used to support other New York tax credits tied to emerging-technology facilities and training.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill lets Excelsior participants compute the state R&D credit using the full cost of R&D expenditures attributable to New York activities, rather than tying the state credit strictly to a portion of the federal credit. However, if a participant receives a federal R&D credit that is itself calculated on a full-cost basis for the same New York expenditures, the state allowance is limited to 50% of the federal portion. The statute keeps project caps (6% standard, 8% for green/Green CHIPS, 7% for semiconductor supply chain projects) and directs use of the 2009 federal definition if the federal credit has expired.
Who It Affects
Directly affects companies enrolled in the Excelsior Jobs Program that perform R&D in New York—particularly R&D-heavy firms, green energy projects, Green CHIPS participants and semiconductor supply-chain projects. It also affects state tax administrators, corporate tax planners, and external accountants who must-draft supporting documentation and reconcile federal and state R&D claims.
Why It Matters
Shifting to a full-cost basis changes the starting point for state credit calculations and can increase potential state subsidies for R&D that occurs in New York. The federal-interaction rule prevents a straight duplication of full-cost federal relief, but leaves open strategic choices about whether to claim federal full-cost credits, how to allocate expenditures between jurisdictions, and how to document activities for both federal and state authorities.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Under current Excelsior statutory language, the research-and-development component has been framed by reference to a taxpayer's federal R&D credit. A10247 rewrites that framing so the state credit can be computed from the taxpayer's full-cost R&D expenditures attributable to activities conducted in New York.
In practice that means a company enrolled in the Excelsior Jobs Program can look at the dollars it spent on qualifying R&D in New York as the base for the state credit rather than only using the math embedded in the federal credit calculation.
The bill then sets a guardrail: if a participant already gets a federal R&D credit that was itself calculated on a full-cost basis for the same New York expenditures, the state credit is capped at fifty percent of the portion of the taxpayer's federal R&D credit that relates to those New York expenditures. This is a binary operational rule companies will need to evaluate when preparing federal returns and deciding whether to use full-cost or another federal R&D accounting method.Separate statutory percentage caps remain the practical limit on the state credit: for ordinary projects the state credit cannot exceed six percent of qualified New York R&D expenditures; the limit rises to eight percent for projects designated as green or Green CHIPS projects and to seven percent for semiconductor supply chain projects.
The bill also instructs that, if the federal R&D credit has expired, New York will compute the comparable federal-related expenditure base using the federal structure and definitions in effect in 2009. Finally, the amendment confirms that the same R&D expenditures used to calculate the Excelsior R&D credit can also serve as the basis for other New York credits tied to emerging-technology company facilities, operations, and training.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill lets Excelsior Jobs Program participants compute the state R&D credit using the full cost of R&D expenditures attributable to New York activities as the base.
If a participant receives a federal R&D credit calculated on a full-cost basis for the same New York expenditures, the state credit is limited to 50% of the federal portion that relates to New York.
The statute preserves explicit caps: 6% of qualified New York R&D expenditures for non-green projects, 8% for green or Green CHIPS projects, and 7% for semiconductor supply-chain projects.
If the federal R&D credit has expired, New York directs use of the federal credit structure and definitions that were in effect in 2009 to compute the comparable expenditure base.
The amendment authorizes firms to use the same New York R&D expenditures as the basis for the Excelsior R&D credit and for the qualified emerging technology company facilities, operations and training credit under New York tax law.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title — 'Empire Innovation Act'
This section gives the act its short title. That is purely captioning, but important in practice because administration materials, guidance and enterprise communications will refer to the 'Empire Innovation Act' when implementing the revised R&D credit rules.
Allows state credit calculation from full-cost R&D expenditures
The core amendment replaces a statute that referenced a percentage of a taxpayer's federal R&D credit with language permitting the state credit to be computed from the taxpayer's full-cost R&D expenditures attributable to New York activities. Practically, that shifts the state's starting point from a federal-credit-derived number to the taxpayer's internal full-cost measurement of R&D spend in New York, which can change both the numerator and denominator used to calculate the state benefit.
Limits state relief where federal full-cost credit is claimed
The amended subdivision crafts a mechanical interaction: when a participant receives a federal R&D credit that was calculated on a full-cost basis for the same New York expenditures, the state award is limited to fifty percent of the portion of that federal credit attributable to New York. This creates two alternative computation routes for taxpayers and a clear rule to prevent duplicative full-cost relief from both levels of government.
Preserves percentage caps, provides 2009 federal fallback, and allows dual use of expenditures
The amendment leaves intact project-specific caps on the state credit (6% standard, 8% for green/Green CHIPS, 7% for semiconductor supply chain). It also instructs that if the federal R&D credit has expired, New York will calculate the related expenditure base using the federal rules and definitions in effect in 2009. Finally, the statute clarifies that R&D expenditures in New York — including salaries and wages for R&D jobs — may be used as the basis for both the Excelsior R&D credit component and the qualified emerging technology company facilities, operations and training credit under state tax law, which has implications for tax allocation and documentation.
Effective date
The act takes effect immediately upon enactment. That means any taxpayer-year overlapping the effective date will need to analyze which computation method applies for that taxable year and plan documentation and filings accordingly.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- R&D-intensive firms in New York that are Excelsior participants and that do not claim a federal full-cost R&D credit — by letting them base the state credit on full-cost expenditures, the law can increase the state credit available to these companies.
- Green projects and Green CHIPS participants — they keep an elevated statutory cap (8%), enhancing the relative subsidy for environmentally focused R&D that occurs in New York.
- Semiconductor supply-chain projects — they retain a higher cap (7%) than the standard rate, preserving tailored incentives for that sector.
- Tax professionals and consultants specializing in state incentives — demand for planning, accounting, and compliance services will increase as taxpayers evaluate the federal–state interaction and choose the most favorable filing approach.
Who Bears the Cost
- New York State fiscal accounts (taxpayers broadly) — expanding the state calculation anchor and allowing full-cost basis claims may increase aggregate credit liabilities, raising budgetary cost unless offset elsewhere.
- Companies that claim a federal full-cost R&D credit — these taxpayers face a state cap to 50% of the federal portion and may therefore see a smaller state benefit than firms that elect not to use federal full-cost calculations.
- State agencies (Economic Development and Tax departments) — they will face heavier administrative and audit burdens to verify full-cost calculations, allocate expenditures to New York activities, and police federal–state coordination.
- Small businesses and startups — while potentially eligible, they will incur compliance and documentation costs to substantiate full-cost R&D expenditures and reconcile interactions across credits.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between expanding a powerful state incentive to attract and retain R&D activity in New York and the resulting fiscal, administrative, and compliance costs: the bill enlarges the possible state subsidy by changing the calculation anchor, but doing so creates complex interactions with federal law, raises allocation and documentation questions, and increases the potential for either duplicative relief or disputes over proper apportionment.
The amendment raises several implementation and interpretive questions. First, the statutory phrase 'portion of the full cost' leaves open how New York will require taxpayers to apportion mixed or multi-state R&D activities: will the state adopt a time-and-effort allocation, cost-center accounting, payroll apportionment, or another methodology?
Absent administrative guidance, companies and auditors will face uncertainty about acceptable allocation methods and supporting records.
Second, the interaction rule that caps the state award at 50% of a federal full-cost credit portion creates a choice architecture that can materially affect filing strategy. Taxpayers must decide whether to elect federal computation methods that maximize federal relief but reduce state benefit, or to use alternate federal approaches that may reduce federal relief but allow a larger state credit.
That trade-off complicates tax planning and may invite retroactive disputes over which federal method 'relates' to New York expenditures.
Finally, the use of the 2009 federal definition where the federal credit has expired creates a potentially awkward calculation: federal rules have evolved, and reverting to a historical definition could produce results that diverge from current accounting practices. The open question of how auditors and revenue officials apply a historical federal standard to contemporary R&D structures (contract research, cloud computing costs, software development) increases compliance risk and administrative workload.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.