Codify — Article

Hurricane Helene and Milton Tax Relief Act of 2025 — EITC, Charity, Retirement Relief

Temporary, targeted tax changes give residents in presidentially declared Helene/Milton disaster areas immediate liquidity and bigger charitable write-offs, while shifting administrative and fiscal burdens to plan sponsors, charities, and tax administrators.

The Brief

This bill creates a package of temporary tax rules for people and organizations tied to Presidential major-disaster declarations for Hurricanes Helene and Milton. It changes how the earned income tax credit is calculated for affected taxpayers, raises and adjusts rules for charitable deductions for disaster relief, and creates special retirement-plan distribution and loan rules to provide quick access to funds.

The measures are narrowly framed in time and geography: they apply to individuals who lived in federally declared areas during a fixed incident period and to contributions and plan actions taken in specified windows. The package aims to prioritize immediate liquidity and charitable funding for disaster response; it also introduces multiple elections, deadlines, and carryover rules that tax professionals, plan administrators, and nonprofits will need to implement carefully.

At a Glance

What It Does

The bill lets eligible disaster-area taxpayers elect to compute the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) using prior-year earned income when current-year earned income fell due to the hurricanes. It expands usable charitable deduction limits for cash gifts directed to hurricane relief (with carryover rules and an option to treat certain early‑2025 gifts as made in 2024). The bill also waives the 10% early-withdrawal penalty for specified retirement distributions, creates a $100,000 cap on such qualified distributions, permits three-year repayment windows and three-year income‑inclusion smoothing, raises permissible plan loan limits to $100,000 and delays certain loan repayments.

Who It Affects

Directly affected are individuals whose principal residence was in a Presidentially declared Helene or Milton disaster area during the incident period, tax preparers and low-income taxpayers claiming EITC, charities receiving disaster donations, employers and retirement-plan sponsors/administrators, and financial institutions that process rollovers or loans. State agencies and the IRS will also see increased workload to track elections, carryovers, and verification.

Why It Matters

The bill creates fast, tax-backed liquidity routes—credit recalculation, larger immediate charitable deductions, penalty-free retirement access—that can speed relief to households and charities. At the same time, it raises administrative complexity (elections, acknowledgments, plan amendments) and presents trade-offs between short‑term relief and long‑term retirement security and federal revenue.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill defines the population and period eligible for relief narrowly: an “eligible individual” is someone whose principal home was in an area where the President declared a major disaster for Hurricane Helene or Hurricane Milton (the bill calls this a “qualified hurricane disaster area”), and the statutory incident period runs from September 28, 2024 through November 2, 2024. That trigger limits the relief to people who both lived in the affected area during that window and suffered an economic loss tied to the hurricanes.

For taxpayers in scope, the bill creates an elective rule for the Earned Income Tax Credit: if a taxpayer’s earned income in the year that includes the incident period is lower than in the preceding year, the taxpayer may elect to substitute the prior year’s earned income for purposes of computing the EITC. The election can be made on a return for any taxable year that includes any portion of the incident period, but the bill bars repeated use of the election; a taxpayer may not make the election for a later year if it was already used once.

The statute treats an incorrect use of this substitution as a mathematical error for deficiency and audit purposes, which narrows IRS challenge procedures.On charitable giving, the bill treats cash gifts made to qualifying public charities for Helene/Milton relief as “qualified hurricane disaster contributions.” For individuals and corporations it relaxes the usual percentage limits, provides a five‑year carryover for excess qualified contributions, and allows taxpayers to treat qualifying gifts paid after December 31, 2024 and before April 15, 2025 as if made on December 31, 2024. The provision also increases the effective deductible amount for individuals by permitting so much of the charity deduction as would otherwise be disallowed to boost the standard deduction, subject to contemporaneous written acknowledgments and an election; donor-advised funds and certain private‑foundation-style gifts are excluded.The retirement-plan relief package has multiple parts.

It exempts specified hurricane-related distributions from the 10% early withdrawal penalty under section 72(t). The aggregate amount that can receive that treatment is capped at $100,000 per individual (reduced by prior years’ qualified distributions), and plans aren’t penalized for treating distributions as qualified unless an employer or its controlled group exceeds the $100,000 cap to a participant.

Recipients may recontribute distributions within three years and elect to include the distributed amount in income ratably over three years (unless they opt out). The bill also raises the maximum permissible loan from a qualified employer plan to $100,000 for eligible individuals and delays certain loan repayments that fall in a 180‑day window surrounding the incident period; plan amendment safe harbors are provided so administrators can adopt changes without running afoul of plan-operation rules.Taken together, the bill delivers immediate cash options and charitable incentives tied to the declared disasters but does so through a web of elections, caps, carryovers, and timing rules that will require clear guidance and careful administration by employers, plan administrators, charities, and tax preparers.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

Incident period is fixed: September 28, 2024 through November 2, 2024 — only individuals with principal abode in Presidentially declared Helene or Milton areas during that window qualify.

2

The bill lets eligible taxpayers elect to compute EITC using the prior taxable year’s earned income if current-year earned income fell, but a taxpayer (or spouse on a joint return) may use that election only once.

3

Qualified hurricane disaster contributions must be cash gifts to §170(b)(1)(A) organizations for Helene/Milton relief paid between the incident-period start and December 31, 2025; gifts paid after 12/31/24 and on or before April 15, 2025 may be treated as made on 12/31/24.

4

The bill waives the 10% early‑distribution penalty for specified qualified hurricane disaster distributions and caps aggregate penalty‑free treatment at $100,000 per individual; recipients can recontribute amounts within three years and elect to spread income inclusion over three years.

5

Plan loans to eligible individuals are temporarily increased so the $50,000 statutory loan cap becomes $100,000 for loans made through June 30, 2025, and loan repayments due during the 180‑day window around the incident period are delayed up to one year (with interest adjustments).

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 2

Definitions and scope

This section sets the statute’s trigger language: who is an eligible individual, what constitutes a qualified hurricane disaster area (a Presidential major‑disaster declaration under the Stafford Act for Helene or Milton), and the incident period (Sept 28–Nov 2, 2024). That narrow statutory framing controls everything that follows — eligibility, timing, and which transactions qualify for the relief mechanics.

Section 3

EITC substitution election

Section 3 allows an eligible individual to elect to calculate the Earned Income Tax Credit for any taxable year that includes part of the incident period by substituting earned income from the preceding taxable year if that prior-year earned income is higher. The provision applies to joint returns if either spouse qualifies and aggregates spouses’ prior-year earned income. The bill treats incorrect use of the substitution as a mathematical error for audit purposes, limits taxpayers to a single use of the election, and otherwise leaves income and tax rules intact.

Section 4

Expanded charitable-deduction treatment for hurricane relief

Section 4 creates the category of “qualified hurricane disaster contributions,” relaxes percentage limitations for individuals and corporations, and permits a five‑year carryover of excess contributions. It also enables an individual’s standard deduction to be increased by the otherwise disallowed portion of such charitable deductions (effectively creating an above‑the‑line benefit in narrow cases). Key mechanics include contemporaneous written acknowledgments from charities, an explicit exclusion of donor-advised funds and certain §509(a)(3) organizations, and a special rule treating gifts paid by April 15, 2025 as made on December 31, 2024.

2 more sections
Section 5 (parts a–c)

Retirement-plan distributions, recontributions, and loan relief

This large section exempts qualified hurricane disaster distributions from the 72(t) early‑withdrawal penalty, caps aggregate qualified distributions at $100,000 per individual, allows three‑year recontribution windows and three‑year income smoothing, and supplies rules for treating recontributions as rollovers. It defines qualified distributions by timing and recipient status and provides plan‑operation relief so administrators can treat distributions as meeting certain plan distribution rules. It also provides a recontribution rule for distributions intended for home purchases that were prevented by the hurricanes.

Section 5 (parts c–d)

Plan loans and amendment safe harbors

The bill boosts the maximum non‑taxable plan loan limit to $100,000 for eligible individuals (through June 30, 2025), revises the fraction-of-accrued-benefit test, delays loan repayments that fall in a defined post‑incident window for up to one year (with interest recalculations), and gives administrative relief for plan amendments adopted within a prescribed period, including extended deadlines for governmental plans.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.

Explore Finance in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Low‑income households in declared Helene/Milton disaster areas — they can elect to use prior‑year earned income to preserve or increase EITC eligibility and receive immediate cash via larger charitable incentives and penalty‑free retirement access.
  • Public charities providing Hurricane Helene/Milton relief — they can attract larger deductible cash gifts and see a five‑year carryover option for donors, which can increase near‑term funding.
  • Donors (individuals and C corporations) — taxpayers making qualifying cash gifts gain higher immediate deductibility limits, an above‑the‑line benefit in narrow cases, and a retroactive 2024 treatment option for early‑2025 gifts.
  • Plan participants facing urgent needs — eligible participants get access to penalty‑free distributions up to an aggregate $100,000 and higher plan loan limits, with temporary repayment relief and flexible recontribution rules.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Retirement‑plan sponsors and administrators — they must implement loan‑limit changes, delayed repayment schedules, recontribution handling, and adopt timely plan amendments; errors expose plans to operational risk.
  • IRS and state tax administrators — administering elections, treating 2025 gifts as 2024, policing contemporaneous acknowledgments, and applying carryovers will increase compliance and guidance burdens.
  • Future taxpayers/federal budget — the revenue cost of expanded deductions, EITC recalculations, penalty waivers, and larger plan loans reduces near‑term federal receipts (and may shift costs elsewhere).
  • Individual long‑term savers — participants who take penalty‑free withdrawals or larger loans may suffer retirement‑savings shortfalls and investment opportunity costs over time.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central dilemma is urgent cash versus long‑term stability: the bill prioritizes rapid, tax‑facilitated access to funds for disaster victims and charities, but every mechanism that eases immediate access (EITC substitution, larger deductions, penalty‑free withdrawals, bigger loans) weakens long‑term retirement accumulation and reduces near‑term federal revenue — a trade‑off between short‑term humanitarian relief and durable financial security that has no clean technical fix.

The bill trades immediate liquidity against longer‑term fiscal and retirement outcomes. Waiving early‑withdrawal penalties and allowing larger loans speeds cash to households but increases the likelihood that participants will not replace withdrawn funds, eroding retirement security.

The $100,000 aggregate cap limits exposure but does not eliminate the behavioral risk that households will treat retirement assets as emergency savings rather than a last resort.

Implementation complexity is significant. The package relies on multiple elections, contemporaneous written acknowledgments from charities, retroactive treatment of certain payments as made in the prior tax year, five‑year carryovers, and plan amendment safe harbors.

Those mechanisms will require clear IRS and Department of Labor guidance; absent that guidance, disputes will arise over qualifier definitions (for example, what counts as funds ‘used’ for relief), timing of elections, and interactions with existing Code sections. Fraud and error risk is real where charities or taxpayers mischaracterize use of contributed funds or where administrators misapply loan and repayment delays.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.