This bill provides permanent resident status to Ruslana Melnyk and Mykhaylo Gnatyuk, allowing them to pursue immigrant visas or adjustment of status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. It also sets a two-year deadline for filing the necessary applications and requires the Secretary of State to reduce the number of visas available to natives of the beneficiaries’ birth country by two in the current or next fiscal year.
Additionally, the bill denies any preferential immigration treatment for the natural parents, brothers, and sisters of the two beneficiaries. The measure is narrowly tailored to these two individuals and does not enact broad changes to general immigration policy.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill grants immigrant visa issuance or adjustment of status to the named individuals and makes them eligible to obtain permanent residence, subject to filing within two years and to a visa-reduction mechanism.
Who It Affects
Directly affects Ruslana Melnyk and Mykhaylo Gnatyuk; indirectly affects the birth-country natives who would see a small reduction in visa numbers and the agencies administering visas (State Department) to implement the adjustment and quota changes.
Why It Matters
It demonstrates a targeted approach to relief within the INA framework, testing how individualized benefits interact with official visa quotas and the treatment of relatives in immigration policy.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill focuses on two individuals, Ruslana Melnyk and Mykhaylo Gnatyuk, and makes them eligible for permanent residency by allowing them to apply for an immigrant visa or to adjust their status once they file the required paperwork. It requires that these applications be filed within two years of enactment and states that, once visas are granted, the Secretary of State should reduce the total number of visas available to natives of the two beneficiaries’ birth country by two for the current or following fiscal year.
The act also excludes the beneficiaries’ natural parents, brothers, and sisters from any preferential immigration treatment arising from their relation. This is a targeted relief measure that does not propose a broad overhaul of immigration policy but instead uses existing INA authorities to grant a specific pathway to two individuals.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill grants permanent resident status to Ruslana Melnyk and Mykhaylo Gnatyuk upon filing for an immigrant visa or adjustment of status.
Applicants must file within two years after enactment for the relief to apply.
Following a grant, the Secretary of State must reduce the birth-country visa allocations by two in the current or next fiscal year.
The beneficiaries’ natural parents, brothers, and sisters are not entitled to preferential immigration treatment due to their relationship.
The relief is narrowly targeted to the two individuals and does not establish a general immigration policy change.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Permanent resident eligibility for the named individuals
The bill states that Ruslana Melnyk and Mykhaylo Gnatyuk shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent residence upon filing the required visa application. This creates a direct, discretionary pathway within the INA framework for the two individuals, independent of the usual grounds for waiver or eligibility pathways, provided other standard criteria are met.
Adjustment if timely entry occurs
If the named individuals enter the United States before the filing deadline, they are considered to have entered lawfully and, if otherwise eligible, may adjust status under INA section 245 as of the enactment date. This provision leverages the status quo framework for adjustment to permanent residence for those already in the U.S. or who can demonstrate lawful entry by the deadline.
Deadline for application and payment of fees
Applications for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status must be filed with appropriate fees within two years after enactment to receive the relief provided by the bill. The two-year window imposes a hard timing constraint on eligibility and ensures a relatively prompt processing path.
Reduction of immigrant visa numbers
Upon the granting of permanent resident status to the two beneficiaries, the Secretary of State shall instruct the officer to reduce by two the total number of immigrant visas available to natives of the birth country of Melnyk and Gnatyuk for the current or next fiscal year. This creates a targeted impact on visa availability that can affect other prospective immigrants from that country.
Denial of preferential treatment for relatives
The bill denies any right, privilege, or status under the INA for the natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Melnyk and Gnatyuk by virtue of their relationship, effectively denying them preferential immigration treatment due to kinship.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Immigration across all five countries.
Explore Immigration in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Ruslana Melnyk — gains a direct path to permanent residency upon filing.
- Mykhaylo Gnatyuk — gains a direct path to permanent residency upon filing.
- Immigration policy analysts and compliance professionals — gain a concrete example of how targeted relief operates within the visa-allocations framework.
Who Bears the Cost
- Natives of the two beneficiaries’ birth country — face a two-visa reduction in the current or next fiscal year.
- Other prospective immigrants competing for visas in the affected category — may experience longer wait times or more congestion in the affected quota.
- U.S. Department of State and consular/visa processing offices — must implement a new deadline, quotas adjustment, and ensure accurate accounting for visa numbers.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is whether a narrowly tailored relief for two individuals should be allowed to affect visa allocations for others from the same country and whether a two-year deadline provides enough time to complete rigorous immigration procedures without undermining the fairness of the broader system.
The bill introduces a highly targeted relief mechanism that sits inside the broader immigration framework. While it achieves a specific outcome for two individuals, it also triggers a reallocation of visas for their birth country, which raises questions about fairness and the impact on other applicants.
The two-year deadline creates a clear urgency for filing, but it also creates a risk that eligible applicants could be left out if the deadline is missed or if processing delays occur. The language about denying preferential treatment for relatives avoids expanding family-based advantages, but it does not address other existing pathways for family sponsorship that could interact with this targeted relief.
Key implementation questions include how the birth-country visa count is calculated in practice, how consistently the deadline is enforced, and what recourse exists if processing backlogs delay eligibility determinations.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.