The bill titled For the relief of Diego Montoya Bedoya would, notwithstanding current Immigration and Nationality Act provisions, make Bedoya eligible for an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status upon filing. It also provides a broad waiver of grounds for removal or admission denial related to records existing at the date of enactment and rescinds any outstanding orders of removal against Bedoya.
A deadline is set: applications with the required fees must be filed within two years of enactment for the relief to apply. In addition to granting status, the bill directs the Secretary of State to reduce by one the total immigrant visas available to natives of Bedoya’s country of birth in the current or next fiscal year.
Finally, it prohibits his natural parents, siblings, and brothers or sisters from receiving preferential immigration treatment by virtue of their relation.
A separate provision anchors the measure in PAYGO budgeting, requiring the budgetary effects to be determined by the latest PAYGO statement prepared for printing in the Congressional Record. The proposal is narrowly tailored to Bedoya and creates a set of policy tensions worth watching: a direct relief path for one individual versus the integrity and stability of visa quotas and family-based preferences, plus the budgetary reporting framework that governs such relief.
At a Glance
What It Does
Section 1 creates a pathway for Bedoya to obtain an immigrant visa or adjust to permanent resident status, even if standard INA provisions would normally block the outcome. It also freezes removal actions and remakes prior inadmissibility findings against Bedoya. Section 2 requires the accompanying budgetary analysis under PAYGO.
Who It Affects
Directly affects Bedoya; affects U.S. visa allocation by reducing one slot from Bedoya’s birth country; affects consular and DHS processing streams; indirectly impacts other applicants from Bedoya’s birth country and their potential wait times.
Why It Matters
It tests a narrow humanitarian relief mechanism that interacts with national visa quotas and family-based preferences, while imposing a formal budgetary assessment requirement for PAYGO compliance.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
This bill is a targeted relief package for a single individual, Diego Montoya Bedoya. It would override certain standard immigration rules to make Bedoya eligible for an immigrant visa or adjustment of status as if he were already eligible, upon filing the required applications.
If Bedoya enters the United States before a deadline and satisfies other eligibility rules, he would be treated as lawfully admitted for permanent residence as of enactment, subject to the usual INA criteria. The bill also bars removal or denial of admission based on grounds listed in DHS or State Department records as of enactment, and it requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to rescind any outstanding removal order or deportation finding tied to those grounds.
The package includes a 2-year filing window for the immigrant visa or adjustment applications with the required fees. Upon granting Bedoya a visa or permanent residence, the Secretary of State must reduce by one the total immigrant visas available to natives of Bedoya’s country of birth in the current or next fiscal year.
In addition, Bedoya’s natural parents, brothers, and sisters would not receive any preferential immigration treatment by virtue of their relationship.Finally, the bill directs that its budgetary effects be determined via the latest PAYGO statement prepared for publication in the Congressional Record, ensuring that the measure aligns with PAYGO standards before any funding implications are considered. The result is a narrowly tailored relief route that engages broader policy questions about quotas, family preferences, and budgetary accountability.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill grants Bedoya eligibility for an immigrant visa or adjustment of status notwithstanding certain INA provisions.
It waives grounds for removal or admission denial related to records on enactment and rescinds related removal orders.
A two-year deadline requires Bedoya’s visa or adjustment application to be filed with fees.
It requires a one-visa reduction from Bedoya’s country of birth in the current or next fiscal year.
Bedoya’s relatives do not receive any preferential immigration treatment based on their relationship.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Permanent resident status eligibility established
Notwithstanding sections 201(a) and (b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Diego Montoya Bedoya shall be eligible for an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status upon filing an immigrant visa application under section 204 or an adjustment application under section 245. This creates a direct, stand-alone path to permanent residency for Bedoya, bypassing the ordinary sequencing under current law.
Adjustment of status based on entry timing
If Bedoya enters the United States before the deadline in subsection (d), he shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall be eligible for adjustment of status as of enactment, provided he meets other eligibility criteria. This attempts to anchor the status in actual presence and admissibility on enactment.
Waiver of removal or denial grounds
Bedoya may not be removed or denied admission in the United States by reason of any ground for removal reflected in DHS or State Department records on enactment. The Secretary of Homeland Security must rescind any outstanding order of removal, deportation, or inadmissibility related to that ground. This provision effectively neutralizes existing removal findings tied to those grounds.
Deadline for application and fees
Subsections (a) and (b) apply only if the immigration visa issuance or adjustment application is filed with the required fees within two years after enactment. This creates a hard clock for Bedoya to pursue relief, tying eligibility to timely filing.
Reduction of birth-country visa numbers
Upon Bedoya’s visa grant or permanent residence, the Secretary of State shall instruct the officer to reduce by one the total number of immigrant visas available to natives of Bedoya’s country of birth under INA section 203(a) (or 202(e) where applicable). The reduction is limited to the current or next fiscal year and directly affects the supply of visas for others from Bedoya’s birth country.
No preferential treatment for certain relatives
Bedoya’s natural parents, brothers, and sisters shall not receive any right, privilege, or status under the INA by virtue of their relation to Bedoya. This limits family-based or derivative advantages that might otherwise accompany Bedoya’s relief.
Budgetary effects and PAYGO
The budgetary effects shall be determined by the latest PAYGO statement prepared for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chair of the House Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage. This anchors the measure to PAYGO accounting and shifts any explicit funding decision into the PAYGO review process.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Immigration across all five countries.
Explore Immigration in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Diego Montoya Bedoya — gains a direct pathway to immigrant visa or permanent residency and removal of current inadmissibility barriers.
- U.S. employers who might employ Bedoya and rely on a stable LPR status to support workforce planning.
- U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Department of State — gain a clear, law-anchored case path and a defined processing trajectory for Bedoya’s relief.
- Immigration law practitioners who represent Bedoya or similar relief-seekers may gain precedent and clarified guidelines for handling targeted relief cases.
Who Bears the Cost
- Natives of Bedoya’s birth country — face a reduction of one visa slot in the current or next fiscal year, potentially delaying other applicants.
- Relatives of Bedoya (parents, siblings) — lose potential preferential treatment they might otherwise have under family-based immigration rules.
- Federal agencies (DHS, DOS) — must administer the relief, rescission of removal orders, and the visa reduction within existing statutory frameworks, potentially increasing administrative workload without explicit funding.
- Taxpayers and the PAYGO framework — costs are to be captured in PAYGO balancing statements rather than explicit appropriations.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing a single-person relief act that grants permanent status against the potential disruption to visa quotas and family-based preferences, all within the constraints of PAYGO budgeting and administrative capacity.
The bill creates a highly targeted relief mechanism for a single individual, then tie-ins it to quota-level adjustments and a PAYGO budgeting process. This raises policy tensions about equity and administrative feasibility: granting a one-off path to permanent residency while reducing a birth-country visa allotment may shift the apparent fairness of the system and create ripple effects for other applicants from that country.
The act’s text is light on funding specifics and leaves how the reduced visa slot will interact with existing priority streams to future PAYGO analysis, which may introduce budgetary uncertainty. The interplay between a privileged grant of status and the broader immigration framework invites questions about scope, timing, and potential unintended consequences for other potential migrants.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.