This bill would amend the Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 to require a two-year study to streamline information collection from disaster applicants and grantees, and to develop a plan for regular reporting of federal disaster assistance data, including a public-facing website. It also directs a second two-year effort to examine preliminary damage assessments across agencies and to explore whether one federal agency should conduct the assessments, including consideration of unmanned aircraft systems to speed administration.
A comprehensive report combining the plans and findings would be submitted to Congress and made public. A technical amendment updates the FAA Reauthorization Act’s table of contents to reference the new section on information collection and PDAs.
At a Glance
What It Does
Requires a two-year interagency study to streamline disaster-data collection and establish a public reporting website; and a second two-year review of preliminary damage assessments with an eye toward centralized administration and new technologies.
Who It Affects
Directly affects FEMA, SBA, HUD, and other agencies; disaster-affected individuals and small businesses; state, local, and tribal governments; and IT vendors supporting disaster-data systems.
Why It Matters
Aims to reduce reporting burdens, improve data transparency, and potentially speed aid by standardizing how information is collected and how PDAs are conducted.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill amends the Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 to require the President’s administration to complete a two-year study to streamline how information is collected from people and organizations applying for or receiving disaster aid. It directs an interagency process to design a plan that makes data collection less burdensome, faster, and easier to consolidate, and to create a regular reporting mechanism that culminates in a public-facing website displaying federal disaster-allowance information.
At the same time, the bill initiates a second two-year effort to review preliminary damage assessments after disasters, including the possibility that one federal agency could handle these assessments for all agencies. It also calls for the exploration of new technologies, such as unmanned aircraft systems, to expedite the process.
The Administrator of FEMA would chair a working group with multiple agencies to identify duplication, fragmentation, and opportunities for a centralized approach. A comprehensive report combining these plans and findings would be submitted to Congress and publicly released, including machine-readable formats when feasible.
A technical amendment ensures the FAA Act’s table of contents reflects this new study. The overarching goal is to reduce administrative burden on applicants and grantees, increase transparency, and improve coordination across federal disaster programs.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires a two-year study and plan to streamline information collection from disaster applicants and grantees.
A second two-year process will assess duplication in preliminary damage assessments and consider a single federal agency for PDAs.
The comprehensive report will combine both plans and be publicly released, with machine-readable data when possible.
The FEMA website must host the public-facing, pre-compressed versions of the report in multiple formats.
The FAA Reauthorization Act table of contents will be updated to reflect the new section 1223.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Cites the act as the Federal Disaster Assistance Coordination Act. The provision establishes the official designation for coordination efforts and signals the act’s cross-agency focus on streamlining information collection and PDAs.
Study to streamline information collection and preliminary damage assessments
This section sets two parallel two-year timelines. Subsection (a) directs the Administrator, with coordination from the SBA, HUD, and IG entities, to study and draft a plan to streamline information collection from disaster applicants and grantees, including a public-facing reporting framework. Subsection (b) directs a parallel effort to convene a standing working group to assess duplication across preliminary damage assessments and to evaluate whether one federal agency should conduct PDAs for all agencies, incorporating emerging technologies such as unmanned aircraft systems to speed administration. Subsection (c) requires a comprehensive report combining both plans and findings for congressional committees. Subsection (d) requires public availability of the report on FEMA’s website in accessible formats, and Subsection (e) allows use of public publications and data resources in preparing the report. Subsection (f) mandates a briefing to Congress within 180 days after submission of the comprehensive report.
FAA Reauthorization Act cross-reference update
As a housekeeping change, the bill amends the table of contents of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 to rename and reflect Section 1223 as the study to streamline information collection and preliminary damage assessments.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Disaster-affected individuals and small businesses who experience reduced reporting burden and faster access to aid.
- State, local, and tribal governments that administer and coordinate disaster assistance and reporting.
- FEMA and partner agency data teams that would gain a more standardized, streamlined data framework.
- Disaster data researchers and open-data users who will benefit from public, machine-readable datasets and transparency.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal agencies (FEMA, SBA, HUD, and others) will incur costs to implement new data standards, reporting systems, and website maintenance.
- State, local, and tribal governments may incur transition costs to align with new reporting requirements and data-sharing practices.
- IT vendors and contractors that design, implement, and maintain the data systems and web infrastructure.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether consolidating information collection and PDAs into a standardized, potentially centralized process will improve efficiency without sacrificing the local, context-specific insights needed for effective disaster response.
The bill’s push for centralized information collection and PDAs raises tensions between efficiency and local nuance. A single, standardized data pipeline can reduce duplicative reporting and speed data aggregation, but it may also obscure jurisdiction-specific considerations that local offices routinely weigh during PDAs.
Implementing new data standards and a public reporting website will require substantial upfront investment and ongoing funding, and must address privacy, security, and governance questions for sensitive disaster data. The bill also relies on interagency coordination across a broad set of agencies with differing missions and budgets, which can complic timely implementation.
The two-year clock for both studies is ambitious given existing disaster workloads and statutory timelines, and the bill leaves questions about oversight, funding, and the mechanics of data sharing to the comprehensive report and subsequent legislative actions.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.