Codify — Article

Rural Outreach Mandate for SBIR and STTR Programs

Requires federal agencies to boost outreach in rural communities to increase participation by rural small businesses in SBIR/STTR.

The Brief

The Rural Innovation and Small Business Support Act adds a rural-outreach requirement to the Small Business Act for agencies that run SBIR and STTR programs. It directs the Administrator to modify policy directives not later than 90 days after enactment to ensure those agencies actively reach and engage small business concerns located in rural communities.

The goal is to expand access to federal SBIR/STTR funding for rural startups and research entities, helping to unlock innovation in underserved areas.

At a Glance

What It Does

The bill adds a new rural-outreach modification to Section 9(j) for the SBIR program and Section 9(p) for the STTR program, requiring agencies to enhance outreach to rural communities and increase participation by rural small business concerns.

Who It Affects

Federal agencies running SBIR/STTR programs and the rural small businesses and research entities that could participate in those programs.

Why It Matters

It signals a deliberate shift to geographic equity in federal R&D funding, potentially broadening the pipeline of rural innovation and jobs by widening access to SBIR/STTR opportunities.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill changes how federal SBIR and STTR programs operate. It requires that the agencies administering these programs implement a rural-outreach strategy.

Within 90 days of enactment, the Administrator must modify the relevant policy directives to ensure every agency participating in SBIR or STTR conducts outreach specifically targeted at rural communities, with the aim of increasing participation by rural small business concerns located in those areas. The amendment applies to both programs, so the reach is broadened in tandem rather than in isolation.

The practical effect is to formalize outreach activities, information dissemination, and engagement efforts designed to lower barriers for rural applicants to apply for SBIR/STTR funding and to strengthen the pipeline of rural innovation.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The bill adds a new paragraph to SBIR policy directives requiring rural outreach.

2

The bill adds a parallel paragraph to STTR policy directives requiring rural outreach.

3

The Administrator must modify policy directives within 90 days of enactment to implement the outreach.

4

The objective is to increase participation of rural small business concerns in SBIR/STTR.

5

The changes affect federal SBIR/STTR program administration and outreach activities across agencies.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 2(a)

SBIR rural outreach requirement

Section 9(j) of the Small Business Act is amended to add a new paragraph mandating that the administering agency not only support SBIR activities but actively enhance outreach to rural communities. The goal is to increase participation of small business concerns located in rural areas in the SBIR program. This creates an explicit obligation for agencies to tailor outreach to rural contexts and champions a more geographically inclusive pipeline for SBIR awards.

Section 2(b)

STTR rural outreach requirement

Section 9(p) of the Small Business Act is amended to include a similar rural-outreach modification for the STTR program. The amendment requires each participating federal agency to undertake expanded outreach toward rural communities to boost the participation of rural small business concerns in STTR. This aligns the STTR program with the SBIR modification and reinforces a rural-access objective across both programs.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Technology across all five countries.

Explore Technology in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Rural small business concerns pursuing SBIR/STTR awards gain improved access to information and opportunities to compete for funding.
  • Rural universities and research centers with tech-transfer avenues gain exposure to federal R&D funding streams.
  • Rural economic development organizations and chambers of commerce gain a clearer path to connecting local firms with federal programs.
  • Federal SBIR/STTR program offices benefit from a broader, more diverse applicant pool.
  • Rural communities may see enhanced technology diffusion and potential job creation from increased program participation.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Federal agencies with SBIR/STTR programs must allocate resources to modify policy directives and implement outreach activities.
  • SBIR/STTR program staff absorb time and operational costs to coordinate and monitor the rural-outreach initiatives.
  • Local rural organizations and communities may incur coordination and event costs to participate in outreach efforts.
  • Universities and industry partners in rural areas may bear administrative costs to engage with the outreach requirements.
  • Overall, incremental administrative costs of expanded outreach are borne by the government and, ultimately, taxpayers.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

Balancing the ambition to broaden access to SBIR/STTR funding for rural communities with the reality of finite agency resources and the need to preserve merit and efficiency in award decisions.

The bill imposes new outreach obligations without specifying funding. That creates a potential tension between expanding access and the agency’s existing resource constraints.

Implementing a robust rural-outreach program could require data collection, performance tracking, and coordination with local economic development actors, which may strain agency workloads if not adequately resourced. There is also a risk that increased outreach could shift application behavior in ways that affect proposal quality or program balance, and there may be uneven implementation across agencies given varying geographic footprints and existing partnerships.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.