The bill adds a new Section 423 to the Older Americans Act to create a competitive federal grant program that funds multigenerational activities in long‑term care facilities. Grants may pay for operating or contracting with a qualified child care facility located within a long‑term care facility, coordinating intergenerational programming, or building/expanding facilities to enable those activities.
The statute sets basic program mechanics—application requirements, a minimum 36‑month grant period, grantee evaluations and reports, and an Assistant Secretary report to Congress with program findings and policy recommendations. It also defines eligible entities and the types of long‑term care facilities covered and requires applicants to certify visitor screening and compliance with state and local infection control and sanitation rules.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill directs the Assistant Secretary under the Older Americans Act to award competitive grants to organizations operating long‑term care facilities to operate or contract with qualified child care centers, coordinate multigenerational activities, or build/expand space for those purposes. Grants must run at least 36 months and recipients must evaluate and report project outcomes.
Who It Affects
The program targets organizations that operate skilled nursing facilities, nursing facilities, board‑and‑care homes, assisted living and similar adult care homes that can colocate child care. It also affects qualified child care providers, state and local licensing authorities, and the federal agency that administers the Older Americans Act programmatic grants.
Why It Matters
This creates a new federal lever to encourage colocated child care and intergenerational programming inside clinical or residential elder settings—an approach advocates argue improves wellbeing for older adults and supports child care access—while building a small evidence base through required evaluations and a consolidated federal report.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill inserts a dedicated grant authority into Part A of Title IV of the Older Americans Act. It requires the Assistant Secretary to run a competitive grant process and award funds to ‘‘eligible entities,’’ which the bill defines as organizations operating long‑term care facilities.
Awarded funds may cover three types of activity: operating or contracting with a qualified child care facility inside the long‑term care site; coordinating multigenerational activities between the child care operation and the long‑term care population; and building new or expanding existing long‑term care space to enable those first two activities.
Applicants must submit whatever information the Assistant Secretary reasonably requires and must include a certification that, for infection control and prevention, the facility conducts visitor screening and complies with applicable state and local sanitation and infection control rules. The bill ties qualified child care facilities to state and local licensing: a facility must have child care as its principal use and meet applicable licensing and regulatory requirements where it sits.Every grantee must evaluate three things: how effectively it operated the child care facility within the long‑term care setting, how effective the coordinated multigenerational activities were, and the impact of co‑location and the activities on older adults and children.
Grantees must submit their evaluations to the Assistant Secretary within six months after the grant period ends. The Assistant Secretary then has six months after receiving all grantee reports to prepare a consolidated report for the House Education and Labor Committee and the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee that lists grantees, describes methods used, explains dissemination plans, and offers any recommended policy changes.The statute specifies minimum grant length (36 months) and enumerates what counts as a long‑term care facility, cross‑referencing Social Security Act definitions for skilled nursing and nursing facilities and adding board‑and‑care and assisted‑living‑style homes.
The bill does not prescribe selection criteria, funding levels, matching requirements, or ongoing operational funding after the grant period—leaving those program design choices for the administering agency.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The grant program funds three distinct activities: operating or contracting with a qualified child care facility colocated in a long‑term care facility; coordinating multigenerational programming between the two operations; and building or expanding facility space to enable those purposes.
Each grant must run for at least 36 months; grantees must submit an evaluation report to the Assistant Secretary no later than six months after the grant period ends.
The bill requires applicants to certify that they screen all visitors and comply with applicable state and local sanitation and infection control requirements as a condition of funding.
The Assistant Secretary must compile grantee reports and submit a consolidated report to the House Education and Labor Committee and the Senate HELP Committee within six months after receiving all grantee reports; that report must include grantee names/addresses, methods used, dissemination strategies, and policy recommendations.
Eligible entities are limited to organizations operating a long‑term care facility as defined in the bill, which includes facilities defined under the Social Security Act (skilled nursing and nursing facilities), board‑and‑care homes, and similar adult care homes such as assisted living.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Citation: ‘‘Care Across Generations Act’’
This is a conventional short title clause that places the new authority under the banner ‘‘Care Across Generations Act.’” It has no operational effect but signals the program’s focus for administration and appropriation tracking.
Establishes competitive grant authority
Subsection (a) is the operative grant authority. It directs the Assistant Secretary to award competitive grants to eligible entities and enumerates permissible uses: operate or contract with a qualified child care facility inside the long‑term care site, coordinate multigenerational activities, and build or expand facility space. The competitive requirement gives the agency discretion over selection, but the bill does not set scoring factors, priorities, or caps—those will be agency decisions in rulemaking or grant guidance.
Application requirements
Subsection (b) requires applicants to submit applications ‘‘at such time, in such manner, and accompanied by such information as the Assistant Secretary may reasonably require,’’ and to meet the additional requirements in subsection (g). This delegates important program design choices—application content, deadlines, and documentation—to the administering agency rather than the statute.
Evaluation, grantee reporting, and agency report to Congress
Subsection (c) obliges grantees to evaluate operation effectiveness, multigenerational programming, and impacts on older adults and children, with a written report due six months after grant expiration. Subsection (d) requires the Assistant Secretary to synthesize grantee reports and report to congressional committees within six months after receipt of all reports, including grantee identities, methods used, dissemination strategy, and policy recommendations—creating a small evidence and policy advisory loop.
Definitions—eligible entities and covered facilities
Subsection (e) defines key program terms. ‘‘Eligible entity’’ means an organization operating a long‑term care facility. ‘‘Long‑term care facility’’ explicitly includes skilled nursing and nursing facilities as those terms are defined in the Social Security Act and adds board‑and‑care and ‘‘other adult care homes, including assisted living.’
Grant length
Subsection (f) sets a statutory floor: all grants must be for at least 36 months. That minimum affects budgeting and planning—short pilot grants are excluded and grantees must plan for multi‑year operations, but the statute does not cap maximum length or address renewals.
Infection control and visitor screening certification
Subsection (g) requires an applicant certification that the entity conducts a screening process for all visitors and complies with applicable state and local sanitation and infection control requirements. This ties eligibility to public health safeguards but leaves the standards and enforcement mechanisms to state/local authorities and grant administrators.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Residents of long‑term care facilities: Increased regular contact with children through colocated child care and coordinated programming can improve social engagement, reduce loneliness, and diversify daily activity options for residents.
- Local families seeking child care: Families who live near or use long‑term care facilities gain potential access to nearby child care services that may have different hours or pricing structures than other local providers.
- Child care providers and early childhood programs: Qualified child care centers may expand enrollment and funding streams by colocating in or contracting with long‑term care operators, creating new market opportunities and program models.
- Long‑term care operators with underused space: Facilities that can repurpose common areas or build small additions may see new revenue sources, improved community integration, and programming that differentiates their services.
- Researchers and policymakers: The required grantee evaluations and the Assistant Secretary’s consolidated report will create data and documented practice examples to inform future policy and program design.
Who Bears the Cost
- Long‑term care facility operators: They must meet application, certification, and reporting obligations, and may incur construction, renovation, staffing, licensing, and ongoing operational costs that grants may not fully cover or sustain after the grant ends.
- Qualified child care providers entering a healthcare setting: Providers face compliance with health‑care adjacent infection control rules, potential liability and insurance adjustments, and operational complexities of serving children inside a residential care environment.
- State and local licensing and public health authorities: Increased cross‑sector activity accelerates demand for inspections, variance determinations, and coordination between child care and health regulators.
- Grant recipients (administrative burden): Grantees must design and conduct evaluations and compile reports within specified timelines, imposing monitoring, data collection, and administrative expenses.
- Federal grant administrator (Assistant Secretary): The agency must design competitive criteria, monitor compliance, synthesize multiple evaluations, and prepare a detailed Congress report—work that requires staff time and potentially new rulemaking or guidance.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances two legitimate objectives—expanding beneficial intergenerational contact and child care access while protecting vulnerable long‑term care residents and meeting public‑health standards—but it provides limited statutory guidance on how to reconcile them; promoting proximity and interaction can improve wellbeing, yet increases infection, licensing, liability, and sustainability risks that require detailed operational rules the statute leaves to future agency action.
The bill creates a program with clear goals but leaves many key design choices to the administering agency. It delegates application content, selection criteria, funding levels, and performance standards to the Assistant Secretary, which allows flexibility but also creates uncertainty for applicants about competitive priorities, allowable costs, match requirements, or sustainability planning beyond the minimum 36‑month grant.
The statute also does not specify an appropriation source or authorize a funding level, so actual program scale will depend on future appropriations and agency rulemaking.
Public‑health and regulatory complexity is the other implementation challenge. The statute requires a visitor screening certification and compliance with state and local infection control rules, but it does not reconcile differences between child care licensing regimes and long‑term care infection control standards—two regulatory frameworks that often have different staff‑to‑child/adult ratios, physical‑space requirements, and sanitary controls.
Those inconsistencies could force applicants into time‑consuming negotiations with state regulators or require facility redesigns that grants may not fully cover. Finally, the evaluation timelines (grantee report due six months after a 36‑month grant) may not capture longer‑term effects on resident health, child development, or program financial sustainability, limiting the evidence base the Assistant Secretary can assemble for policy recommendations.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.