Codify — Article

FINANCE Act (S.3233) adds grant program for caregiver financial planning

Creates a new Older Americans Act grant stream to fund licensed financial planning and referrals targeted to informal family caregivers, with accessibility and legal-referral requirements.

The Brief

The bill amends Title IV of the Older Americans Act to insert a new Section 415 establishing a discretionary grant program for financial planning services aimed at family caregivers. The Assistant Secretary may award grants to state and local government agencies, area agencies on aging, nonprofit organizations, multipurpose senior centers, institutions of higher education, and tribal organizations to deliver those services.

Grants must fund services delivered by appropriately trained and licensed individuals and cover a specified slate of topics — from public-benefit navigation and long-term care cost information to debt relief and estate-planning referrals — and require accessibility measures including assistive technology, translation, and formats compatible with American Sign Language. The change channels federal aging-network resources toward caregiver-focused financial counseling while leaving key implementation choices (funding levels, award criteria, oversight) to the Administration.

At a Glance

What It Does

Adds Section 415 to the Older Americans Act to authorize grants for financial planning services tailored to family caregivers. Grants must be used to deliver counseling on benefits, care options, budgeting, debt and bankruptcy, long-term care costs, and referrals to legal assistance.

Who It Affects

Informal family caregivers (including older relative caregivers meeting the bill’s criteria), area agencies on aging and nonprofits that apply for grants, institutions that supply licensed financial-planning staff, and HHS/Administration for Community Living for program oversight.

Why It Matters

This is a targeted expansion of the aging-services toolbox: it formalizes caregiver-focused financial planning as an allowable federal aging program activity and embeds accessibility and legal-referral requirements that will shape how services are delivered on the ground.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill inserts a stand-alone Section 415 into Title IV of the Older Americans Act to create a grant program focused on financial planning for family caregivers. It defines who counts as a "family caregiver," with a special sub-definition for "older relative caregivers" (people age 55+ who are primary caregivers for a child or an individual with a disability).

The definition explicitly excludes paid providers whose engagement is based on a contract or employment.

The Assistant Secretary for Aging gets discretionary authority to award grants to a specified set of entities: state and local government agencies, nonprofits, area agencies on aging, multipurpose senior center providers, institutions of higher education, and tribal organizations. Applicants must submit whatever application materials the Assistant Secretary requires; the bill does not specify application deadlines, scoring criteria, award sizes, or required match, leaving those operational decisions to the agency.Grant funds must be used to deliver financial planning services through individuals with appropriate training and licenses.

The bill lists a menu of required topics and supports: public-benefits guidance; care-option guidance (including paid and unpaid caregiver support); budgeting, saving, and spending advice; conversations about future care wishes; debt, debt-relief, and bankruptcy information; long-term care cost education; access to materials from the resource center referenced in section 215(k); and referrals to legal-assistance providers under Titles III or VII for estate planning and related matters. It also requires that services be accessible — via assistive technology, translated and interpreted for non‑English speakers, and in formats compatible with American Sign Language and multiple languages.Because the statute ties delivery to licensed or appropriately trained individuals and specifies both educational and referral duties, implementation will combine counseling, benefits navigation, and cross-referrals to legal and aging-network services.

The bill does not appropriate funds or set program metrics; those details, along with award mechanisms, remain agency-level decisions after enactment.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The bill creates a new Section 415 in the Older Americans Act authorizing discretionary grants for financial planning services targeted to "family caregivers.", The statutory definition excludes paid caregivers and defines "older relative caregiver" as someone age 55+ who is the primary caregiver and lives with a child or person with a disability.

2

Eligible grantees are limited to state/local government agencies, nonprofits, area agencies on aging, multipurpose senior center providers, institutions of higher education, and tribal organizations.

3

Grant funds must pay individuals with appropriate training and licenses to provide counseling that explicitly covers public benefits, care options, budgeting, debt and bankruptcy, and information on long-term care costs.

4

Services funded must be accessible — including assistive technology, translation/interpretation, ASL-compatible and multi‑language formats — and must include referrals to legal assistance providers under Titles III or VII and materials from the resource center in section 215(k).

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 1

Short title — FINANCE Act

Provides the Act’s short title: "Financial Services Improving Noble and Necessary Caregiving Experience Act" or "FINANCE Act." This is purely stylistic but signals the bill’s focus on financial services for caregivers.

Section 415(a)

Definitions — Family caregiver and older relative caregiver

Defines core beneficiary populations. "Family caregiver" means informal (unpaid) adult family members or others providing in‑home/community care to older adults or people with Alzheimer’s and related disorders; it excludes relationships grounded in payment or professional agreements. The statute separately defines "older relative caregiver" with a 55+ age floor and conditions that capture grandparents and other relatives who are primary caregivers for children or persons with disabilities. These definitions set eligibility boundaries for services and clarify the bill’s intentional focus on informal, often multi-generational caregiving situations.

Section 415(b)-(d)

Grant authority, eligible grantees, and applications

Authorizes the Assistant Secretary to award grants and lists who may apply: state or local government agencies, nonprofits, area agencies on aging, multipurpose senior center providers, institutions of higher education, and tribal organizations. The bill leaves the application content, timing, and submission format to agency rulemaking or guidance. That approach gives the Administration flexibility but means statutory silence on award sizes, selection criteria, matching requirements, duration of awards, monitoring, or required reporting.

1 more section
Section 415(e)

Permitted uses and delivery requirements for grant funds

Specifies the substance and delivery standards for funded financial planning services. Services must be provided by individuals with appropriate training and licenses and include a detailed list of counseling topics: public-benefit navigation; care options; budgeting/saving/spending; initiating conversations about future care; debt management and bankruptcy guidance; long-term care cost information; and referrals to legal assistance for estate plans and powers of attorney. It also requires accessibility measures — assistive technology, accessible language/formats, translation/interpretation, and ASL compatibility — and points grantees to resource materials from the center identified in section 215(k). Practically, this frames grants as funding not only counseling content but also outreach, technical materials, and cross-referral pathways to the aging and legal services networks.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Social Services across all five countries.

Explore Social Services in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Informal family caregivers who need help planning: The bill channels federal grant dollars toward counseling on benefits, budgeting, long‑term care costs, and debt – services tailored to caregivers juggling care and household finances.
  • Older relative caregivers (grandparents/older kin): The statute explicitly recognizes caregivers age 55+ who are primary caregivers for children or people with disabilities, improving focus on a demographic that faces distinct financial strains.
  • Area agencies on aging and nonprofit caregiver organizations: Those entities are eligible for grants, creating an opportunity to expand programming and integrate financial planning into existing caregiver supports.
  • Institutions of higher education and training programs: Eligible institutions can receive grants to develop curricula or clinical programs that produce the "appropriately trained" workforce the statute requires, potentially creating new practice pathways.
  • Legal-assistance programs: The referral requirement to Titles III or VII legal providers will likely increase demand for probate, guardianship, and estate-planning services and strengthen aging/legal services coordination.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Grantee organizations (state/local agencies, area agencies, nonprofits, tribal organizations): They must hire or contract with licensed/trained planners, deliver accessible services, and meet application and administrative demands — all of which carry staffing and technology costs.
  • Licensed financial-planning professionals and counselors: Providers will need caregiver-specific training and to ensure compliance with both program delivery standards and professional licensing/regulatory requirements (which may increase costs or liability exposure).
  • Administration for Community Living / Assistant Secretary for Aging: The agency must design award rules, monitoring and reporting systems, and guidance on what qualifies as "appropriate" training and licenses — an administrative burden with resource implications.
  • Small rural and tribal providers: They may struggle to compete for grants or to scale accessibility and translation services, effectively shifting the geographic distribution of services unless awards prioritize equity and capacity-building.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central dilemma is between meeting caregivers’ clear need for tailored, licensed financial-planning help and the practical limits of creating that capacity through an unspecified, discretionary grant program: delivering high-quality, accessible, and legally safe advice requires funding, workforce development, and regulatory clarity, but the bill delegates those hard choices to administrative implementation rather than prescribing them.

The statute sets program goals and delivery standards but leaves funding levels, award criteria, and evaluation metrics unspecified. That creates a classic federal-grant trade-off: flexibility for the agency and grantees, but uncertainty about reach, continuity, and equity.

Without appropriations language or a statutory allotment formula, the program’s scale will depend entirely on future budget decisions.

The bill requires services to be provided by "individuals with the appropriate training and licenses," but it does not define those terms or reconcile them with state rules governing financial advice, investment solicitation, or legal services. That gap raises questions about liability, permissible scope (for example, can grant-funded staff recommend specific financial products?), and whether grantees must secure insurance or adapt contracts to avoid offering regulated financial advice.

The legal-referral requirement sends clients to Titles III and VII services, yet the bill provides no new funding for legal aid; increased referrals could strain existing civil-legal capacity. Finally, accessibility requirements — assistive technology, ASL-compatible materials, translations — improve access but also increase program costs and implementation complexity, particularly for small or rural grantees.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.