The BITCOIN Act of 2025 would establish a centralized program to accumulate and safekeep Bitcoin for the federal government. It creates a decentralized network of secure storage facilities to hold government Bitcoin private keys and requires ongoing monitoring and auditing by Treasury, with security expertise from other agencies and industry experts.
It also sets up a Bitcoin Purchase Program to acquire up to one million Bitcoins over five years, hold them for a minimum of 20 years, and dispose of non-dominant forked assets after a market-cap priority process. The bill also contemplates offsetting program costs through Federal Reserve remittances and gold certificate adjustments, while giving states the option to participate in segregated accounts.
At a Glance
What It Does
Establishes a decentralized network for storing Bitcoin held by the federal government, and creates a program to buy 200,000 BTC per year for five years, placing assets in a government reserve.
Who It Affects
Treasury and federal agencies, the Federal Reserve, independent auditors, state governments that participate, and the broader Bitcoin market and related service providers.
Why It Matters
It shifts how the U.S. could hold digital assets, introduces formalized oversight, and ties asset accumulation to a longer-term debt/financing strategy while expanding the role of the government in digital-asset infrastructure.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill would create the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, a nationwide network of secure storage facilities under the Treasury, to hold Bitcoin private keys and manage government Bitcoin holdings. It requires security practices designed with input from the Defense and Homeland Security departments and industry experts, and it mandates that forks and airdrops be accounted for within the reserve.
The act also mandates a Bitcoin Purchase Program that would buy 1,000,000 BTC over five years (200,000 BTC annually), with all acquisitions deposited into the Reserve and held for at least 20 years. After the initial 5-year holding period, the government would determine whether non-dominant forked assets should be disposed of, or retained if they offer novel utility, with proceeds going to the Treasury.
The bill includes a public-oversight framework: quarterly Proof of Reserve reports and an independent auditor, plus CG oversight. It allows voluntary state participation in segregated accounts, and it creates mechanisms to offset program costs through Fed remittances and changes to gold certificates, while preserving private-property rights and outlining new coordination with the Exchange Stabilization Fund.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill establishes a decentralized network of secure Bitcoin storage facilities to form the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.
It creates a Bitcoin Purchase Program to acquire 1,000,000 Bitcoins over five years (200k/year).
A minimum 20-year holding period applies to Bitcoin in the Reserve, with strict restrictions on sale or disposal.
Forked and airdropped assets are managed within the Reserve, with a market-cap-based disposition process after the 5-year period.
A public reporting framework and independent audits ensure transparency and accountability.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Findings
This section lays out the bill’s rationale, highlighting Bitcoin’s role in the global economy, its potential as a national reserve asset, and the strategic rationale for diversifying federal holdings to include digital assets.
Definitions
Key terms are defined, including airdrops, forks, cold storage, and the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, establishing the vocabulary for how the program will operate and be audited.
Establishment of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve
The Treasury must create a geographically dispersed network of secure Bitcoin storage facilities for cold storage of government holdings, with ongoing oversight, security measures, and collaboration with defense and homeland security experts.
Bitcoin Purchase Program
The Secretary must purchase 1,000,000 BTC over five years (200k per year) and hold them in trust within the Reserve, with a rule-based mechanism to adjust purchases as market conditions require.
Proof of Reserve
The Secretary publishes quarterly public reports detailing holdings and private-key controls, engages an independent cryptographic auditor, and allows CG oversight to ensure compliance and transparency.
Consolidation of Government Bitcoin Holdings
Any Bitcoin controlled by federal agencies becomes transferred to the Reserve, with mandatory transfers upon title acquisition and prohibitions on encumbrance or sale pending future rules.
Offsetting the Cost of the Reserve
The bill modifies Reserve remittance rules, allowing certain net earnings to fund the Purchase Program, and directs gold-certificate adjustments to support program funding and debt reduction goals.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Treasury and federal agencies gain centralized control and accountability for federal Bitcoin holdings.
- The Federal Reserve benefits from a mechanism that offsets program costs through remittances and related financial adjustments.
- Independent auditors and the Comptroller General gain a defined role in ongoing oversight and verification of reserve operations.
- State governments opting into voluntary segregated accounts gain security and formal terms for custody of their Bitcoin holdings.
- Bitcoin market participants and security providers may benefit from clearer rules, supply, and resilience expectations.
Who Bears the Cost
- The general public and taxpayers bear indirect risk if the program affects debt dynamics or market stability.
- Federal agencies incur new security, auditing, and compliance obligations to protect and manage holdings.
- States participating in segregated accounts bear contractual costs and risk transfers related to custody responsibilities.
- Private sector cybersecurity, storage, and auditing service providers may face increased demand and compliance costs.
- The federal government bears costs associated with ongoing audits, reporting, and potential legal liabilities tied to asset custody.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between creating a robust, auditable digital-asset reserve for strategic purposes and the risks of long-term government holding of a volatile private asset, including potential market distortion, opportunity costs, and the challenge of ensuring secure, scalable custody alongside meaningful oversight.
The bill introduces a large-scale, state-backed digital-asset program that trades off centralized, auditable storage and long holding periods for potential debt-management benefits and strategic market positioning. It creates new, highly technical custody mechanisms and a public reporting regime, which raises questions about implementation risk, cybersecurity, and the practicalities of long-term asset disposal and valuation.
While the measures aim to improve transparency and resilience, the long time horizons (20-year holding) and the potential for market impact require careful monitoring to avoid unintended consequences for the broader financial system.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.