This Act would establish a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and a Bitcoin Purchase Program to acquire up to 1,000,000 Bitcoins over five years and hold them in a decentralized network of storage facilities. It also creates rules for handling forks and airdrops, sets up reporting and transparency requirements, and consolidates government Bitcoin holdings into the Reserve.
The plan would be funded through adjustments to Federal Reserve remittances and gold certificate remittances, with the goal of diversifying national assets and potentially reducing debt. The bill frames Bitcoin as a digital-age asset that can bolster financial resilience while imposing strict holding periods, oversight, and security requirements.
At a Glance
What It Does
Establishes a decentralized Strategic Bitcoin Reserve for cold storage, creates a Bitcoin Purchase Program to acquire 1,000,000 Bitcoins over five years, and sets rules on forks, airdrops, and asset disposition.
Who It Affects
Federal agencies holding Bitcoin, the Treasury, the Federal Reserve System, state governments that participate voluntarily, and private sector auditors and security contractors.
Why It Matters
Signals a formal federal embrace of Bitcoin as a strategic asset, with long-term holding, transparency, and debt-management implications that professionals need to assess for risk, governance, and market impact.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The BITCOIN Act of 2025 would create a new Strategic Bitcoin Reserve—an envisioned nationwide network of secure storage facilities tasked with holding the United States’ Bitcoin assets. The Secretary of the Treasury would oversee the Reserve, which would also manage private keys and ensure ongoing security and auditing.
The bill also establishes a Bitcoin Purchase Program intended to acquire 1,000,000 Bitcoins over five years (200,000 per year), with the option to adjust the schedule if market conditions warrant. All Bitcoin acquired would be held in trust within the Reserve for long horizons and would be subject to a minimum 20-year holding period to promote stability and security of the asset base.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires the Secretary to establish a decentralized Bitcoin Reserve for cold storage of government holdings.
The Bitcoin Purchase Program aims to acquire 1,000,000 Bitcoins over five years (200,000/year).
Forks and airdrops must be accounted for and stored within the Reserve, with a 5-year hold before disposition.
A 20-year minimum holding period applies to all Bitcoins in the Reserve, with limited exceptions.
Annual public, cryptographically attested reports are required to prove Reserve integrity and holdings.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Findings
Section 2 lays out the rationale for treating Bitcoin as a strategic asset: digital assets have become significant in the global economy, Bitcoin has shown resilience, and a diversified national asset base could strengthen financial security. The findings underpin the policy logic for the Reserve and the Purchase Program, framing Bitcoin as a complement to traditional reserves.
Definitions
Section 3 defines core terms—airdrop, Bitcoin Purchase Program, cold storage, fork, Secretary, and Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. These definitions establish the scope and mechanics by which assets and processes are governed, including what constitutes a fork and how forks and airdrops are treated in the Reserve.
Establishment of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve
Section 4 requires the Secretary to establish a decentralized network of secure Bitcoin storage facilities across the United States, for the purpose of cold storage of government Bitcoin holdings. It mandates geographic dispersion, risk-based location selection, and collaboration with defense, homeland security, and industry experts to ensure robust security.
Bitcoin Purchase Program
Section 5 sets up the Purchase Program to acquire 200,000 Bitcoins annually for five years, totaling 1,000,000 Bitcoins. Purchases must be transparent and non-disruptive to markets; assets are held in trust for the United States. The Secretary can adjust the schedule by rule, and Bitcoin acquired through other means may offset the Purchase Program’s requirements.
Proof of Reserve
Section 6 establishes a Proof of Reserve system, requiring quarterly public reports with detailed holdings, transactions, and cryptographic attestations, published by Treasury. An independent auditor verifies the attestations, and the Comptroller General conducts ongoing oversight of the Reserve and related reporting.
Consolidation of Government Bitcoin Holdings
Section 7 obligates all federal agencies to transfer Bitcoin under their control to the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve upon title transfer, effectively consolidating government holdings and prohibiting further encumbrances by agencies.
Voluntary State Participation and Segregated Accounts
Section 8 allows states to participate voluntarily by placing their Bitcoin holdings in segregated accounts within the Reserve. States sign agreements detailing custody, security controls, and retained title. States can withdraw or transfer holdings under contract terms, with liabilities clearly allocated.
Offsetting the Cost of the Reserve
Section 9 modifies the Federal Reserve’s discretionary surplus and remittance rules to fund the Bitcoin Purchase Program, including new gold certificate procedures. Remittances up to a cap fund purchases first, with any excess used to reduce the debt. The changes also direct a value adjustment of gold certificates and require annual reporting of funding sources and allocations.
Protection of Private Property Rights
Section 10 clarifies that nothing in the Act authorizes seizure or impairment of private property rights in Bitcoin. It affirms individuals’ rights to maintain lawful control over digital assets, emphasizing privacy and financial sovereignty.
Modification of the Exchange Stabilization Fund
Section 11 updates ESF authorities by adding Bitcoin to the assets the Fund can hold and by enhancing transparency, requiring additional detail on Bitcoin transactions and holdings in annual ESF reporting.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Economy across all five countries.
Explore Economy in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- U.S. Treasury gains a structured asset program with potential debt-offset opportunities and formal oversight.
- Federal Reserve Banks can participate in funding and governance structures related to the Purchase Program.
- State governments that participate gain a defined custody mechanism and security framework for their Bitcoin holdings.
- Independent cryptographic auditors and security firms benefit from the contracting opportunities created by the Proof of Reserve.
- Federal agencies currently holding Bitcoin benefit from consolidated custody within the Reserve.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal agencies must transfer holdings into the Reserve, incurring custody and administrative costs.
- Taxpayers bear indirect costs through program implementation and long-term holding requirements.
- Private-sector contractors (auditors, security firms, consultants) incur ongoing costs to meet reporting and security standards.
- States that participate take on legal and security obligations for segregated accounts and potential liability.
- Market participants may face price and liquidity implications from large, planned Bitcoin purchases and reserve activities.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether the federal government should actively acquire, store, and manage a decentralized digital asset as a strategic reserve to diversify national assets and potentially offset debt, while maintaining strong security, transparency, and fiscal discipline in a system that inherently values decentralization and market-driven price discovery.
The bill creates a tension between centralizing a decentralized digital asset within a government-controlled reserve and the decentralized ethos of Bitcoin. The long 20-year holding period, the 5-year fork/airdrop disposition rule, and the dominance-based retention of forks could create market distortions and governance questions.
While Section 6 imposes cryptographic attestations and independent audits to bolster transparency, the effectiveness depends on the integrity of external auditors and the robustness of cryptographic proofs. The reliance on Fed remittances and gold certificate monetization to fund the program embeds this policy in broader fiscal and monetary dynamics, raising questions about opportunity costs and monetary-policy implications.
Finally, the expanded role of the ESF to include Bitcoin signals a fundamental shift in asset management and disclosure requirements that will invite scrutiny from Congress, the Comptroller General, and the public.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.