The Thriving Communities Act of 2025 directs the Secretary of Transportation, in coordination with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, to establish a thriving communities grant program. The program will provide technical assistance and capacity building to help the fastest growing communities move forward transformative infrastructure projects.
The bill also requires an annual report to the House Appropriations Committee detailing methods to promote transit-oriented development, the coordination between the two departments, and the metrics used to distribute funding. It authorizes annual funding of $100 million to DOT and $5.5 million to HUD to support the program.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Secretary of Transportation, in coordination with HUD, shall establish a thriving communities grant program to provide technical assistance and capacity building to the fastest growing communities to advance transformative infrastructure projects.
Who It Affects
Federal agencies implement the program, while local and regional planning bodies in rapidly expanding areas—such as MPOs, city and county transportation departments, and HUD-assisted housing authorities—participate as program recipients and beneficiaries.
Why It Matters
This interagency approach links housing, mobility, and infrastructure, aiming to accelerate TOD and other mobility-enhancing projects in growth corridors, with transparent funding metrics.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The act creates a new federal grant program housed within the Department of Transportation that works in tandem with the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Its purpose is to deliver technical assistance and capacity-building support to communities experiencing rapid growth so they can advance large-scale infrastructure projects.
The program is explicitly connected to transit-oriented development, encouraging planning that aligns housing, transportation, and land use. The bill also requires DOT to report to the House Appropriations Committee on how the program operates, howDOT and HUD coordinate their roles, and what metrics determine funding distribution.
Finally, it authorizes annual appropriations of $100 million to DOT and $5.5 million to HUD to run and coordinate the program.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates a new Thriving Communities Grant Program within DOT, coordinated with HUD, to support growth-focused infrastructure.
Annual funding authorized: $100 million to DOT and $5.5 million to HUD.
The program prioritizes transit-oriented development and cross-agency coordination.
A required annual report to the House Appropriations Committee covers methods, roles, and funding metrics.
The act concentrates resources on the fastest-growing communities to accelerate transformative projects.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
This section designates the act as the Thriving Communities Act of 2025 and specifies how it may be cited in law.
Establishment of the Thriving Communities Program
The Secretary of Transportation, in coordination with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, must establish a thriving communities grant program. The program provides technical assistance and capacity building to help the fastest growing communities advance transformative infrastructure projects, with an emphasis on aligning transportation planning with housing and development goals.
Report to the Appropriations Committee
The Secretary must submit to the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives a report detailing the methods used to promote transit-oriented development, the coordination between DOT and HUD and the respective roles, and the metrics used to distribute funding under the program.
Authorizations of Appropriations
There is authorized, for each fiscal year, $100,000,000 to DOT to carry out this section and $5,500,000 to HUD to facilitate coordination with DOT to carry out this section.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Infrastructure across all five countries.
Explore Infrastructure in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Metropolitan planning organizations and city/county transportation planning offices in fast-growing metro areas, which can align mobility investments with growth
- HUD-assisted housing authorities coordinating with DOT to promote transit-oriented development
- Transit agencies planning and implementing TOD-enabled projects in growth corridors
- Regional planning organizations (MPOs) coordinating cross-jurisdictional infrastructure efforts
- Local governments and community development entities involved in infrastructure-led revitalization efforts
Who Bears the Cost
- DOT and HUD will incur administrative and coordination costs to establish and operate the program
- Local and regional agencies may face added reporting and coordination requirements and timelines
- State and local governments may incur upfront costs in planning and aligning TOD initiatives with the program
- Private sector applicants seeking grants may incur time and resource costs to prepare competitive proposals
- Taxpayers bear the general fiscal cost of annual appropriations to fund the program
Key Issues
The Core Tension
How to balance rapid, transformative infrastructure investments in growth areas with concerns about equity, displacement, and geographic distribution within a finite federal funding envelope.
The Thriving Communities Act foregrounds interagency coordination between transportation and housing agencies as its core mechanism. While this alignment can unlock integrated mobility and housing outcomes (especially TOD), it also introduces potential implementation challenges.
The reliance on annual appropriations implies ongoing budgetary discipline and potential variability in funding levels across years and administrations. Moreover, the focus on the fastest-growing communities could skew attention and resources toward growth hotspots at the expense of slower-growing but strategically important areas, potentially exacerbating regional disparities or displacement pressures if not carefully managed.
These trade-offs warrant close scrutiny of eligibility, metrics, and long-term affordability safeguards as the program matures.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.