What the bill does: HB2099 amends the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) to (1) add entrepreneurs to the list of key participants served by state workforce development boards and to include entrepreneurial skills development and microenterprise services; (2) expand the set of eligible training providers to include providers of entrepreneurial skills development programs; (3) require local employment and training activities to include information on entrepreneurship and referrals to microenterprise services; and (4) authorize a three-year multistate study of entrepreneurial skills development programs, along with related demonstrations and pilot projects. Why it matters: by embedding entrepreneurship more deeply into workforce programs and by measuring outcomes, the bill aims to improve program design, provider qualifications, employer engagement, and the potential for participants to achieve self-employment and job-creating ventures.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill enlarges participant scope on state workforce boards, expands eligible training providers to include entrepreneurship programs, requires local activities to address entrepreneurship, and launches a rigorous evaluation of entrepreneurial skills initiatives through a three-year, multistate study.
Who It Affects
State workforce development boards, local workforce areas, eligible training providers offering entrepreneurial skills programs, and individuals pursuing or considering entrepreneurship as a career path.
Why It Matters
Brings entrepreneurship into the core of workforce strategy, creates a framework to evaluate what works, and aligns training with entrepreneurship outcomes, potentially boosting small business formation and regional economic growth.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
HB2099 makes four interrelated changes to WIOA. First, Section 101(d)(3)(D) expands the membership and focus of state workforce development boards by adding entrepreneurs and by including entrepreneurial skills development and microenterprise services alongside traditional occupations.
This broadens the governance and program design conversation at the state level to explicitly consider entrepreneurship as a workforce outcome. Second, Section 122(a)(2)(C) expands the universe of eligible training providers to include those delivering entrepreneurial skills development programs, signaling a policy shift toward recognizing entrepreneurial training as a formal component of workforce investment.
Third, Section 134(c)(2)(A) broadens the content of local employment and training activities to include information on entrepreneurship and, when appropriate, referrals to microenterprise services, with additional language to support entrepreneur-focused resources. Finally, Section 169 introduces a formal, three-year multistate study on entrepreneurial skills development programs.
This study, funded via a grant or contract, will review best practices for developing entrepreneurial skills, provider qualifications, employer engagement, credentialing, and the economic impact of these programs, and will provide concrete recommendations for States and local communities. The bill also contemplates related demonstration and pilot projects that promote self-employment and entrepreneurship as part of workforce initiatives.
Taken together, these changes aim to produce better-targeted services, measurable outcomes in entrepreneurship, and stronger links between workforce programs and local business development.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Enlarges state workforce boards to include entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship services.
Adds entrepreneurial skills development programs to eligible training provider lists.
Requires local activities to include entrepreneurship information and microenterprise referrals.
Funds a three-year multistate study assessing practices, credentials, and economic impact.
Authorizes demonstrations and pilots to promote self-employment within workforce programs.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Expand board scope to include entrepreneurs and related services
This section amends the existing language to replace references to 'jobseekers' with 'jobseekers, and entrepreneurs' and adds 'entrepreneurial skills development and microenterprise services' to the list of items under consideration by state workforce development boards. The practical effect is to broaden governance discussions and potentially influence program design to incorporate entrepreneurship-focused activities.
Identify providers of entrepreneurial skills development
The amendment inserts 'providers of entrepreneurial skills development programs' into the list of eligible training providers after 'organizations.' The change expands which entities can deliver WIOA-supported training, opening pathways for microenterprise and entrepreneurship-focused curricula to receive public funding and support.
Local activities include entrepreneurship information and referrals
Clause adjustments add reference to entrepreneurship resources and referrals to microenterprise services within the local employment and training activity framework. It also broadens subclauses to allow additional entrepreneurship-related opportunities, ensuring locals can connect participants to startup-oriented supports as part of career pathways.
Evaluations and research on entrepreneurial programs
This major new section requires a three-year multistate study conducted by the Secretary via a grant or contract. The study covers practices for developing entrepreneurial skills, mentoring approaches, provider qualifications, employer engagement, credentials, and outcomes such as earnings and economic impact. It also prescribes that states develop recommendations to expand access and includes provisions for addition of entrepreneurship-focused participants and for related demonstration and pilot projects.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Economy across all five countries.
Explore Economy in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- State and local workforce development boards gain a formal avenue to coordinate entrepreneurship-focused services and to embed entrepreneurship in strategic plans.
- Eligible training providers that offer entrepreneurial skills development programs gain eligibility and potential funding streams to scale their curricula.
- Aspiring and current entrepreneurs can access workforce programs with dedicated resources, referrals, and potential credential recognition.
- Employers and private sector partners benefit from a workforce pool with stronger entrepreneurial capability and readiness to partner on innovation or business development.
- Local communities see stronger links between workforce systems and microenterprise growth, potentially boosting regional economic activity.
Who Bears the Cost
- State and local workforce agencies may incur additional coordination and reporting costs to implement the broader scope and new data needs.
- Training providers will need to align curricula, outcomes metrics, and administrative requirements with the new program expectations.
- Local employers may need to engage more deeply in program design and participant placement efforts to support entrepreneurship outcomes.
- The federal government will fund the three-year study via grants or contracts, representing upfront program evaluation costs.
- Community organizations and microenterprise partners could face transitional costs as they interface with WIOA processes and funding streams.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing a strengthened focus on entrepreneurship within workforce programs against the risk of diluting core employment services and overextending program oversight. While the study aims to identify effective practices, states must navigate metrics, funding, and partner coordination to ensure entrepreneurship activities complement, rather than crowd out, traditional workforce objectives.
The bill introduces a substantial shift by embedding entrepreneurship more directly into the workforce system and by mandating a comprehensive study to identify best practices and outcomes. This raises analytical questions about measurement, implementation burden, and equity.
Ensuring that entrepreneurship outcomes align with traditional workforce goals (such as employment stability and earnings) will require careful data collection, consistent metrics, and clear governance roles. There is also the challenge of maintaining program integrity and avoiding mission drift, as resources are allocated to new service lines and partnerships with microenterprise providers.
Finally, the implementation will hinge on the availability of funding for the three-year study and the capacity of states to adapt their training networks to include entrepreneurship components.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.