Codify — Article

HB 2690: Redefines employer-directed skills development under WIOA

Introduces an interview exemption for employer-referred training and creates formal employer-led training agreements through local workforce boards.

The Brief

The Improve Employer-Directed Skills Act amends the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to define employer-directed skills development and to rename the program area accordingly. It adds an Interview Exception that allows a one-stop operator or partner not to conduct an interview or assessment if the prospective trainee is referred by an employer and certified as needing training for unsubsidized employment with that employer.

The bill also createsEmployer-Directed Skills Development Agreements, enabling local boards to contract with employers to deliver training, specifying the provider, duration, credentials or skills to be earned, costs, expected earnings, the employer’s share, and a commitment to hire upon completion. Finally, it requires a global technical amendment to replace the term “customized training” with “employer-directed skills development” throughout Title I.

This framework expands employer involvement in workforce development while tying funding and hiring expectations to employer participation.

At a Glance

What It Does

The bill adds an Interview Exception to avoid mandatory interviews for employer-referred training and creates formal Employer-Directed Skills Development Agreements outlining program details, employer contributions, and hiring commitments.

Who It Affects

One-stop operators, local boards, employers proposing training partnerships, and training providers delivering the programs. Participants entering employer-led tracks are directly affected through new cost-sharing and hiring commitments.

Why It Matters

It formalizes employer-driven training within the WIOA framework, potentially accelerating placement with participating employers and shifting cost-sharing and program design toward private partners.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill updates the federal workforce program by defining and normalizing employer-directed skills development within the existing WIOA framework. A key feature is the Interview Exception, which allows a one-stop operator or partner to skip the interview, evaluation, or assessment for individuals who are referred by an employer to receive on-the-job training or employer-directed skills development, provided the employer certifies the trainee’s need for training and readiness for unsubsidized employment with that employer.

This creates a streamlined path for employer-driven training referrals. In addition, the bill creates Employer-Directed Skills Development Agreements enabling local boards to contract with employers to deliver training.

Each agreement must specify the provider (which could be the employer), the program length, recognized credentials or occupational skills to be gained, the total program cost, estimated earnings after completion, the employer’s share of the cost (not less than a defined minimum), and a commitment by the employer to hire participating individuals upon successful completion. A global technical amendment then replaces every instance of “customized training” with “employer-directed skills development” across Title I of the act.

The overall aim is to formalize employer involvement, clarify funding responsibilities, and establish hiring commitments tied to training outcomes.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The bill creates an Interview Exception that allows employer-referred training to bypass standard interviews or assessments.

2

An Employer-Directed Skills Development Agreement framework standardizes employer involvement in program design, costs, credentials, and hiring commitments.

3

Employers must contribute a minimum share toward training costs under these agreements.

4

The term “customized training” is replaced with “employer-directed skills development” throughout Title I.

5

Local boards can contract with employers to deliver training and specify earnings outcomes and hiring commitments for participants.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 1

Short Title

This act may be cited as the Improve Employer-Directed Skills Act. It establishes the formal name for the legislation and sets the stage for the amendments that follow within the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act.

Section 2(a)

Interview Exception

The amendment to Section 134(c)(3)(A) adds an employer-referral pathway that allows a one-stop operator or partner to avoid conducting an interview, evaluation, or assessment if the individual is referred by an employer for on-the-job training or employer-directed skills development and is certified by the employer as needing training to obtain unsubsidized employment with that employer. This creates a faster route for employer-led training partnerships while tying eligibility to employer certification.

Section 2(b)

Employer-Directed Skills Development Agreement

This provision authorizes a local board to receive a contract from an employer to provide employer-directed skills development. The agreement must identify the program provider (which may be the employer), duration, the recognized credentials or occupational skills earned, total program cost, estimated earnings upon completion, the employer’s share of the cost (not less than the minimum specified in section 3(19)(C)), and a commitment by the employer to hire the participant(s) after successful completion. It formalizes the cost-sharing and hiring commitments that accompany employer-led training.

1 more section
Section 2(c)

Global Technical Amendment

Title I of WIOA is amended to replace all references to customized training with employer-directed skills development, aligning terminology across the statute with the new framework and ensuring consistency in how these programs are described and funded.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Economy across all five countries.

Explore Economy in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Employers that participate in the agreements gain direct access to trained workers and a framework for cost-sharing and hiring commitments that align with workforce needs.
  • Local boards and one-stop operators benefit from a clearer process to broker employer-led training and potentially streamline program delivery.
  • Training providers and postsecondary credentialing institutions (e.g., community colleges) that partner as program providers can gain structured contracts and defined outcomes.
  • Participants may access employer-directed programs with explicit pathways to employment and credential attainment.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Employers must contribute a minimum share of training costs, creating a direct financial obligation for participating companies.
  • Local boards and funding programs may face increased administrative and oversight responsibilities to manage these agreements.
  • Training providers may incur administrative costs to meet agreement requirements and deliver specified credentials.
  • Public funds may be redistributed toward employer-led training, potentially affecting other WIOA program allocations.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central trade-off is between accelerating employer-aligned training through cost-sharing and hiring commitments, and preserving fair access, consistent credentialing, and program integrity across diverse local boards.

The bill introduces a significant shift by embedding employer-driven design and financing into the core WIOA structure. While the Interview Exception and the Employer-Directed Skills Development Agreements can accelerate skill formation aligned with employer needs, they also raise questions about equity, oversight, and consistency in program quality across localities.

Ensuring that credentialing remains portable and that earnings estimates reflect real labor market outcomes will be crucial. Additionally, the reliance on employer certification and cost-sharing could influence which participants gain access to training and whether programs remain accessible to disadvantaged groups.

Careful implementation and robust evaluation will be needed to avoid erosion of universal access principles within workforce development.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.