The GREEN Appraisals Act of 2025 requires covered mortgage creditors and federally connected housing agencies to recognize and incorporate property-level energy information into residential appraisals and underwriting. It forces creditors to disclose borrowers’ rights to obtain and share an energy report, requires appraisers who receive such reports to take the information into account, and bars using an energy report as a ground to reject an appraisal or loan application.
The bill matters because it changes how market value may be determined for single-family homes with energy efficiency upgrades or on-site generation. For lenders, servicers, appraisers, and compliance teams, the Act creates new disclosure duties, new appraiser competency requirements, mandatory system changes for loan origination, and a joint-agency guidance and quality-assurance process—shifting some valuation risk onto the appraisal process and federal supervisory agencies.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Act requires creditors to give borrowers a written notice about energy reports, provide appraisers with borrower-consented energy reports, and compel qualified appraisers to consider those reports when producing a value. It also instructs covered federal housing agencies to issue joint guidance, create an advisory committee, and set technical standards and systems requirements.
Who It Affects
Directly affects federally connected mortgage activity: FHA, VA, USDA Rural, Ginnie Mae, FHFA-regulated enterprises (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac), creditors as defined by TILA, appraisers who perform residential valuations, and providers of energy reports (HERS assessors, Home Energy Score providers).
Why It Matters
By embedding energy performance into appraisal workflows and lender systems, the bill aims to make energy improvements visible in loan underwriting and secondary-market purchase decisions—potentially increasing financing available for energy upgrades and changing collateral valuation practices across the conforming market.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act creates three linked obligations: disclosure to borrowers, appraisal consideration of energy reports when provided, and joint-agency rulemaking and implementation requirements. Creditors must give borrowers a written notice at the time of mortgage disclosures telling them they may obtain an energy report and that appraisers will consider such reports; borrowers can request and receive a copy of an energy report at no cost.
If a borrower consents, the creditor must pass any existing energy report to the appraiser when the appraiser is assigned.
Appraisers who receive an energy report must take that information into account when forming an opinion of value. The law sets what counts as an energy report—analyses that document energy-related features, estimate expected energy costs or savings, or estimate on-site renewable generation—and authorizes several accepted methods (e.g., HERS or Home Energy Score) or other Secretary-approved methods with quality assurance.
The statute also specifies a ‘‘qualified appraiser’’ standard that combines state licensure, demonstrated competency, and completion of a 7-hour continuing education course approved by the Appraisal Foundation.The statute forbids using the mere availability of an energy report as a basis to reject an appraisal or to deny a covered loan; instead, creditors must underwrite using the appraised value provided by a qualified appraiser. The heads of covered agencies must jointly issue guidance confirming acceptable valuation approaches, set procedures for disclosures and sharing reports, stand up an advisory committee of stakeholders, and require lenders to update origination and underwriting systems to accommodate appraisals that incorporate energy reports.
The bill sets implementation timeframes for system changes and for the requirement that appraisers be provided reports when available.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill prohibits creditors from rejecting an appraisal or loan application solely because an energy report was considered — underwriting must use the appraised value from a qualified appraiser.
On and after March 1, 2026, if an energy report exists and the borrower consents, the creditor must provide that report to the appraiser at assignment.
A ‘‘qualified appraiser’’ must be state-licensed, competent for the assignment, and have completed a minimum 7-hour AQB-approved continuing education course on considering energy reports.
The heads of covered agencies must create a joint advisory committee representing industry and consumer groups and jointly issue creditor guidance and systems requirements.
Within two years of enactment, creditors originating loans with energy reports must use origination and underwriting systems that can review, score, or rate appraisals consistent with the agencies’ guidance.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Provides the Act’s short title: Getting Renewable and Energy Efficient Neighborhoods Appraisals Act of 2025 or GREEN Appraisals Act of 2025. This is a housekeeping provision but signals the bill’s explicit focus on renewable and efficiency attributes as valuation inputs.
Mandatory borrower notice about energy reports
Requires each covered agency to compel creditors to give borrowers, at the same time as TILA/HUD-required disclosures, a written notice explaining the borrower may obtain or provide an energy report, may request an energy report, and that appraisers will consider any such report but that its effect on appraised value could be positive, negative, or neutral. Practically, lenders must add this notice to the standardized disclosure package and train origination staff to deliver it.
Underwriting must use appraised value; energy reports cannot be a basis to reject
Directs creditors to underwrite using the appraised value produced by a qualified appraiser and explicitly disallows treating an appraiser’s consideration of an energy report as a ground to reject an appraisal or loan. This shifts the treatment of energy data away from being a reason to decline collateral and toward being an input the appraiser evaluates, thereby constraining discretionary lender-side rejections tied to energy findings.
Appraisers must consider energy characteristics and defined report standards
On a specified effective date, creditors must provide appraisers with borrower-consented energy reports and appraisers who receive them must consider specified items (efficiency characteristics, renewable features, estimated savings, relative consumption). The bill defines ‘‘energy report’’ and lists acceptable methodologies (HERS, Home Energy Score, or Secretary-approved methods with QA), which creates a limited universe of recognized technical inputs for appraisers to use.
Borrower access to energy reports
Requires creditors to provide a copy of an energy report to a prospective borrower at no cost upon request. For borrowers and resale markets, this makes energy assessments more portable and reduces duplicative assessor costs, but shifts responsibility for delivering an existing report onto the creditor.
Joint agency guidance, stakeholder advisory committee, and systems deadlines
Tasks covered agencies with jointly issuing guidance that confirms acceptable valuation approaches, prescribes procedures for disclosures and report sharing, and avoids dictating appraisal judgment. Agencies must establish an advisory committee spanning housing, energy, and appraisal interests and must require creditors to update origination and underwriting systems within two years of enactment to support appraisals that account for energy reports.
Who and what the Act covers
Defines covered agencies (FHA, FHFA as to enterprises, Ginnie Mae, USDA Rural Housing Service, VA), covered loans (residential mortgage loans made, insured, purchased, guaranteed, or securitized by those agencies), creditors (TILA definition), energy report criteria, HERS acronym, and the qualified appraiser standard (state licensure, competency, 7+ hour AQB-approved course). These definitions determine the statute’s scope and which mortgage transactions and professionals the obligations reach.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Housing across all five countries.
Explore Housing in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Homeowners with energy upgrades — They can present an energy report that appraisers must consider, increasing the chance that efficiency or on-site generation is reflected in the home’s appraised value and potentially improving loan access or sales price realization.
- Energy raters and assessment providers (HERS, Home Energy Score vendors) — Demand for standardized energy reports should rise if borrowers see valuation benefits, creating new revenue opportunities for certified raters and scoring platforms.
- Buyers in energy-improved neighborhoods — Prospective buyers will have clearer, transferrable evidence of a property’s expected energy costs and generation, making energy attributes more transparent in purchase decisions and lending.
- Appraisers with the required training — Appraisers who complete the AQB-approved coursework gain a marketable credential to perform valuations where energy reports are present, potentially expanding assignments tied to energy-conscious lenders and markets.
Who Bears the Cost
- Creditors (originators and secondary-market sellers) — Must add the disclosure, deliver borrower-consented reports to appraisers, and upgrade origination and underwriting systems within two years, incurring development, compliance, and training costs.
- Small lenders and community banks — Systems and process changes can be proportionally more expensive for smaller institutions, and they may face liquidity friction adapting to new appraisal inputs without large IT budgets.
- Appraisers — Require completion of the mandated 7-hour AQB-approved course and may face additional time per assignment to evaluate energy reports, increasing per-file costs or turnaround time.
- Covered agencies and supervisors — Must jointly craft guidance, stand up an advisory committee, approve QA processes and Secretary-approved methods, and oversee compliance without explicit appropriations in the bill, creating potential administrative burdens.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between improving market recognition of energy-related value (so efficiency and renewables are rewarded in purchase and lending decisions) and the added complexity, cost, and subjectivity introduced into the appraisal and underwriting pipeline; the bill promotes transparency and potential market correction, but relies on discretionary appraisal judgment and agency rulemaking to prevent inconsistent, costly, or exclusionary outcomes.
The bill standardizes a pathway for energy data to enter mortgage valuations, but it leaves significant discretion with appraisers and agency guidance. That discretion creates two operational headaches: first, appraisers will need clear standards and market-comparable data to assign reliable incremental value to efficiency or generation features; second, creditors’ automated underwriting systems must be recalibrated to accept heterogeneous, sometimes imperfect, energy inputs without producing inconsistent risk scores across lenders.
Quality control is another open question. While the statute limits acceptable report methods and calls for Secretary-approved QA, it delegates technical validation to agencies and the advisory committee.
In practice, inconsistent assessor methodologies, regional variation in energy markets, and the potential for optimistic or outdated report inputs could yield valuation noise. There is also a compliance vector: lenders must pass existing reports to appraisers only with borrower consent, raising logistical and privacy considerations (who retains copies, how long they’re stored).
Finally, the bill does not attach explicit funding for agency implementation or for subsidizing assessments in low-income markets, which could leave poorer borrowers and smaller lenders behind as systems roll out.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.