The bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to let workers deduct union dues above the line (reducing adjusted gross income) and to permit a miscellaneous itemized deduction for unreimbursed expenses incurred in the trade or business of being an employee. The miscellaneous deduction is treated as a miscellaneous itemized deduction and is subject to the 2%‑of‑AGI floor when taxpayers itemize.
This matters because it changes who benefits from employee work‑related costs: union members gain an above‑the‑line adjustment that helps taxpayers whether or not they itemize, while other employees regain a limited, floor‑constrained itemized deduction for unreimbursed business expenses — with attendant compliance and revenue consequences for the federal tax system.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill adds a sentence to IRC §62(a)(1) exempting deductions for union dues and expenses from the general bar on employee deductions, making those costs above‑the‑line adjustments. It also amends IRC §67(g) to except unreimbursed employee trade‑or‑business expenses from the suspension of miscellaneous itemized deductions and makes them subject to the 2%‑of‑AGI floor.
Who It Affects
Directly affects employees who pay union dues and employees who incur unreimbursed business expenses (for example, sales staff, educators, home‑office or travel costs not reimbursed by employers). It also affects tax preparers, the IRS (administration and audit focus), and the federal budget through reduced revenues.
Why It Matters
Above‑the‑line treatment for union dues changes tax outcomes by lowering AGI and altering phase‑outs and credits tied to AGI. Restoring a 2% miscellaneous itemized deduction for employee costs reintroduces a category of deductible expenses that will increase compliance complexity and create room for disputes over what counts as an employee business expense.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill does two distinct things inside the Internal Revenue Code. First, it adds a carve‑out to the general rule that bars deductions tied to being an employee: deductions for union dues and related union expenses are explicitly excluded from that bar and may be claimed above the line on Form 1040.
As an above‑the‑line deduction, union dues will reduce adjusted gross income, which can change eligibility for credits, phase‑outs, and other tax calculations that use AGI.
Second, the bill restores a narrow path for employees to deduct unreimbursed expenses they incur performing their jobs. It amends the provision that suspended miscellaneous itemized deductions so that those employee trade‑or‑business expenses are once again treated as miscellaneous itemized deductions, but only when the taxpayer itemizes and only to the extent they exceed 2% of adjusted gross income.
That means many taxpayers still will see no benefit unless their unreimbursed costs are large enough and they choose to itemize instead of taking the standard deduction.Practically, the statute divides employee costs into two buckets: union dues (above the line) and all other unreimbursed employee business costs (itemized, subject to the 2% floor). The text gives no new definitions beyond these mechanics, so taxpayers and the IRS will rely on existing standards for what qualifies as an ordinary and necessary expense attributable to performing services as an employee.
The bill applies to tax years starting after December 31, 2024.Because the union‑dues deduction reduces AGI while the other category requires itemization and a 2% threshold, the bill creates very different outcomes across workers: union members who do not itemize still receive tax relief, whereas non‑union workers only benefit if their unreimbursed expenses clear the 2%‑of‑AGI hurdle and they itemize. The statute leaves implementation details — documentation standards, definitions, and interactions with employer reimbursement programs — to IRS guidance and audit practice.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill amends IRC §62(a)(1) to permit an above‑the‑line deduction specifically for union dues and union expenses, letting taxpayers reduce AGI for those costs.
It amends IRC §67(g) to exempt unreimbursed expenses ‘‘attributable to a trade or business consisting of the performance of services by the taxpayer as an employee’’ from the suspension of miscellaneous itemized deductions.
Unreimbursed employee business expenses covered by the exemption are treated as miscellaneous itemized deductions and are therefore subject to the 2%‑of‑AGI floor in §67(a) and only benefit taxpayers who itemize.
The bill contains no new definitional text beyond these edits; qualification will rely on existing tax‑law concepts (ordinary and necessary employee business expenses) and subsequent IRS guidance.
The amendments apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, so they affect returns for tax year 2025 and later.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Designates the act as the "Tax Fairness for Workers Act." This is purely nominal but frames the statutory package for statutory references and outreach materials.
Above‑the‑line deduction for union dues (amendment to IRC §62(a)(1))
Adds a sentence to §62(a)(1) stating that the general limitation on deductions attributable to being an employee does not apply to deductions for union dues and expenses. Mechanically, that pulls union dues out of the normal employee‑deduction bar and allows taxpayers to claim them as adjustments to income rather than as itemized deductions. Because the change is to §62, it affects AGI and thus downstream calculations (phaseouts, credits, IRA contribution limits) rather than only taxable income.
Reinstatement of miscellaneous itemized deduction for unreimbursed employee expenses (amendment to IRC §67(g))
Reworks §67(g) so that the suspension of miscellaneous itemized deductions does not apply to itemized deductions that are attributable to an employee’s trade or business. The provision explicitly instructs that those items be treated as miscellaneous itemized deductions for purposes of applying subsection (a), which preserves the 2%‑of‑AGI floor. Practically, that means taxpayers who itemize may deduct unreimbursed employee business expenses above 2% of AGI, but the statute does not broaden what qualifies as an employee expense beyond existing law.
Effective date
Specifies that the amendments take effect for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024. This timing means the changes apply prospectively to the first returns covering tax year 2025 and later; there is no retroactive relief for earlier years or special transition rules included in the text.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Union members who pay dues: They receive an above‑the‑line deduction that lowers AGI, benefiting both itemizers and non‑itemizers and potentially improving eligibility for AGI‑based credits and phaseouts.
- Employees with large unreimbursed job expenses (e.g., certain sales representatives, educators with out‑of‑pocket classroom costs, traveling or remote workers without employer reimbursement): They can claim those costs as miscellaneous itemized deductions if they itemize and expenses exceed 2% of AGI.
- Tax preparers and payroll/tax advisors: Increased demand for planning and compliance services as taxpayers and employers evaluate documentation, demonstrate eligibility, and choose between standard deduction and itemizing strategies.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal revenues/treasury: Restoring these deductions reduces taxable income across affected filers and therefore lowers federal receipts relative to current law, creating a budgetary cost.
- IRS and tax administration: The agency will face greater compliance and audit workload to verify employee expense claims and to issue guidance clarifying qualification and documentation standards.
- Employers and HR departments: Expect increased administrative friction as employees seek reimbursements and documentation; employers may face pressure to expand accountable reimbursement plans or defend against employee claims that employer reimbursements were insufficient.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill pits fairness for workers who shoulder unreimbursed job costs against administrability and budget discipline: restoring deductions corrects an apparent inequity for employees, but it also reintroduces complexity, verification burdens, and revenue losses — a trade‑off between targeted tax relief and predictable, enforceable tax administration.
The bill reinstates tax relief for employee costs but leaves key implementation details unspecified. It does not define terms such as ‘‘union expenses’’ or give a fresh statutory test for what counts as an expense ‘‘attributable to a trade or business consisting of the performance of services by the taxpayer as an employee.’’ That vacuum means the IRS will need to issue guidance about qualifying categories, documentation standards, and how to treat mixed‑use or partially reimbursed items.
Expect litigation and audit disputes over borderline items (home office shared between employee and employer use, clothing that is partly personal, travel where employer pays a portion).
Another tension is the asymmetry the law creates: union dues become an above‑the‑line adjustment while other employee costs remain behind an itemization and 2% floor. Above‑the‑line treatment benefits lower‑income filers and those who do not itemize, while the itemized route limits relief to taxpayers with relatively large unreimbursed expenses.
That split raises equity and behavioral questions — for example, whether employers will alter reimbursement practices to shift tax benefits, or whether taxpayers will restructure spending to cross the 2% threshold. Finally, treating employee expenses as deductible invites tax planning and, potentially, abusive claims; balancing taxpayer fairness with administrability and revenue loss will be a central implementation challenge.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.