Codify — Article

Moab UMTRA Project Transfer Act of 2025 to Grand County

Transfers the Moab UMTRA site to Grand County at no cost upon remedial completion, with water rights retained and safeguards in place.

The Brief

This bill amends the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 to provide for the transfer of the Moab UMTRA site to Grand County, Utah. The transfer would occur after a remedial action completion status is deemed sufficient for land conveyance by the Secretary of Energy in consultation with relevant regulators, and would be at no cost to Grand County, subject to any restrictive conditions.

In conjunction with the conveyance, the United States would retain water rights deemed necessary to fulfill the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act obligations and to maintain access for groundwater remediation, and the conveyance would include a prohibition on reconveyance to private entities or nonprofit organizations. The Secretary of Energy may impose additional terms and conditions to protect U.S. interests.

The bill thus formalizes a federal-to-local transfer mechanism for a portion of the Moab site, balancing local control and cleanup responsibilities with federal stewardship of critical water rights and regulatory safeguards. It codifies the conditions under which the land and its associated rights move out of federal management while preserving mechanisms to ensure ongoing environmental protection and adherence to nuclear tailings regulations.

At a Glance

What It Does

Amends Section 3405(i) of the 1999 NDAA to authorize conveyance of the Moab site to Grand County, Utah at no cost, contingent on remedial action completion status and regulatory consultation. It preserves water rights for the United States and adds a reconveyance prohibition plus potential additional terms.

Who It Affects

Directly affects Grand County and Utah regulatory authorities, the Department of Energy, and agencies overseeing UMTRA and groundwater remediation. Local communities around Moab also participate as stakeholders in the transition.

Why It Matters

Establishes a clear, legally codified path for local ownership of the cleanup site while safeguarding essential water rights and environmental protections, enabling local governance without abandoning federal cleanup obligations.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The Moab UMTRA site cleanup has long been a federal responsibility managed under the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act and related regulations. This bill would allow the Department of Energy to convey all federal rights and interests in the Moab site to Grand County, Utah, at no cost, once a remedial action status satisfactory for land conveyance is achieved in coordination with relevant regulators.

That status is determined by the Secretary of Energy in consultation with those regulators, and subject to any legal or regulatory restrictions needed to protect public health and safety.

As part of the conveyance, the United States would retain certain water rights necessary to carry out UMTRA-related duties, including groundwater remediation and access to wells within the conveyed footprint. The conveyance would also include a prohibition on Grand County from reconveying any portion of the land to private entities or nonprofits.

The Secretary of Energy would be empowered to add further terms and conditions to protect U.S. interests as part of the transfer.In practical terms, this bill moves the Moab site's governance from federal oversight to a local government structure, while maintaining critical protections around water rights and environmental remediation. It creates a framework for local control with guardrails to ensure ongoing compliance with federal tailings standards and water-resource responsibilities.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The bill authorizes conveyance of the Moab site to Grand County at no cost.

2

Conveyance occurs after a remedial action completion status is achieved, as determined by the DOE in consultation with regulators.

3

The United States retains water rights necessary for UMTRA obligations and groundwater remediation.

4

The conveyance includes a prohibition on reconveyance to private or nonprofit entities.

5

DOE may attach additional terms and conditions to protect U.S. interests during the transfer.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 3405(i)(6)(A)

Conveyance to Grand County at no cost

Subject to other subparagraphs, the Secretary of Energy shall convey, at no cost, all U.S. right, title, and interest in the Moab site to Grand County once a remedial action completion status is established. This determination is made in consultation with relevant regulatory authorities and may be subject to restrictions necessary to protect human health and safety and to comply with applicable laws, including UMTRCA and related regulations.

Section 3405(i)(6)(B)

Retention of water rights

In carrying out the conveyance, the United States retains water rights deemed necessary to fulfill the Secretary of Energy’s UMTRA and groundwater remediation responsibilities, including access to wells and the associated surface footprint for ongoing remediation activities.

Section 3405(i)(6)(C)

Prohibition on reconveyance

The conveyance must include a provision prohibiting Grand County from reconveying any portion of the conveyed land to private entities or nonprofit organizations, ensuring that control remains with the public sector as intended by the transfer framework.

1 more section
Section 3405(i)(6)(D)

Additional terms and conditions

The Secretary of Energy may require additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance as necessary to protect U.S. interests, which may cover environmental, regulatory, or land-use safeguards beyond the core provisions.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Energy across all five countries.

Explore Energy in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Grand County, Utah, as the landholding entity gaining control and potential local redevelopment opportunities.
  • State regulatory agencies (e.g., Utah DEQ) that retain oversight of water rights and remediation commitments.
  • U.S. Department of Energy, for orderly transfer while maintaining essential protections.
  • The Moab-area communities and local contractors who may benefit from redevelopment and continuing environmental cleanup messaging.
  • The broader UMTRA program and federal agencies ensuring continued compliance with tailings regulations.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Grand County may incur administrative and compliance costs associated with managing the conveyed site.
  • DOE and federal regulators bear ongoing oversight and contract administration costs to enforce the conveyance terms.
  • Utah regulators (e.g., DEQ) may incur monitoring and enforcement costs to oversee retained water rights and ongoing groundwater remediation.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

Can Grand County responsibly manage the Moab site and sustain adherence to federal tailings standards while the federal government cedes control and water-rights obligations to a local entity?

The transfer framework creates a notable shift: a no-cost conveyance moves site control from federal to local hands, but it does so with explicit protections around water rights and environmental safeguards. A potential tension lies in ensuring local governance maintains rigorous oversight of groundwater remediation and compliance with federal tailings standards without the ongoing direct funding or delegation that a federal program would normally command.

The proposal attempts to balance local development with federal stewardship by preserving essential rights and giving the Secretary of Energy room to impose conditions, yet questions remain about long-term funding, enforcement, and how emerging remediation challenges would be handled at the local level.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.