The Moab UMTRA Project Transition Act of 2025 would amend the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 to transfer the Moab site to Grand County, Utah, at no cost, once remedial action status meets a threshold for land conveyance. The conveyance includes retention of water rights by the United States and imposes conditions to safeguard health, safety, and ongoing remediation.
It also prohibits reconveyance to private entities and allows the Secretary of Energy to attach additional terms as needed to protect U.S. interests. The bill places the transfer within the framework of existing UMTRA obligations and regulatory oversight to ensure continued protection of groundwater and public health.
At a Glance
What It Does
Subject to a remedial action completion status, the Secretary of Energy shall convey all available U.S. rights in the Moab site to Grand County, Utah, at no cost, with water rights retained and certain conditions and restrictions in place.
Who It Affects
Grand County and local regulators in Utah; the Department of Energy, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and other federal environmental regimes; and entities involved in groundwater remediation and site management.
Why It Matters
It creates local stewardship while preserving federal oversight for health, safety, and environmental protections at a legacy uranium mill tailings site, and sets conditions to prevent private reconveyance of the conveyed land.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill amends current law to facilitate the transfer of the Moab UMTRA Project site from the federal government to Grand County, Utah. The transfer would occur once a remedial action status is achieved that is deemed sufficient for land conveyance, as determined by the Secretary of Energy in consultation with relevant regulators.
The transfer would be at no cost to Grand County and would include all available U.S. rights to the land, while explicitly retaining water rights necessary to fulfill federal responsibilities under UMTRA and related statutes. The conveyance would also prohibit Grand County from reconveying any portion of the land to private parties or nonprofits, and would allow the Secretary of Energy to impose additional terms and conditions to protect U.S. interests.
The overall goal is to facilitate local management of the site alongside ongoing health and safety protections, groundwater remediation, and regulatory compliance.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill authorizes transfer of the Moab site to Grand County at no cost.
The transfer occurs only after a remedial action completion status is reached with regulatory concurrence.
Water rights necessary for federal UMTRA responsibilities remain retained by the United States.
Conveyance includes a prohibition on reconveyance to private entities or nonprofits.
The Secretary of Energy can impose additional terms to protect U.S. interests during conveyance.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
General transfer of Moab site upon remedial completion
This subsection establishes the general mechanism for conveying the Moab site to Grand County once remedial actions reach a status sufficient for land conveyance, as determined by the Secretary of Energy in consultation with relevant regulatory authorities. It specifies conveyance at no cost and frames the transfer within the broader UMTRA remediation program, ensuring that critical health and safety considerations guide the timing and conditions of transfer.
Retention of water rights
This subsection requires that, in the conveyance, the United States retain water rights necessary to perform its obligations under the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act and related regulations. The retained rights must also support ongoing groundwater remediation and, if wells are involved, maintain access to the groundwater footprint associated with the site.
Prohibition on reconveyance
This subsection prohibits Grand County from reconveying any portion of the land conveyed under the subsection to private entities or nonprofit organizations. The prohibition is intended to prevent private re-aggregation of the site and to preserve the intended public stewardship framework established by the transfer and subsequent land-use restrictions.
Additional terms and conditions
This subsection authorizes the Secretary of Energy to impose additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance as necessary to protect U.S. interests. These terms can address use restrictions, long-term environmental stewardship, and coordination with regulatory authorities to ensure ongoing compliance with federal requirements.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Grand County, Utah – gains ownership and management authority over the Moab site with a clearly defined framework and safeguards.
- Utah Department of Environmental Quality and other state regulators – benefit from a clearer, codified mechanism for coordination with federal agencies and local oversight.
- U.S. Department of Energy – benefits from a cleaner asset portfolio and aligned responsibilities under the UMTRA program while maintaining necessary oversight.
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission – benefits from continued regulatory visibility and cooperation with state and local authorities to ensure safety.
- Residents and local workers in Grand County – benefit from ongoing remediation, clearer local governance, and health protections tied to groundwater and land-use safeguards.
Who Bears the Cost
- U.S. Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission – incur administrative costs to implement and monitor the transfer, ensure regulatory compliance, and maintain oversight.
- Federal taxpayers – bear the ongoing funding burden for regulatory oversight and the UMTRA program as the asset transitions to local stewardship.
- Grand County, Utah – may incur administrative and regulatory compliance costs associated with managing the conveyed land under federal and state requirements.
- Utility providers and local water stakeholders – potential costs associated with coordinating water rights and ensuring compliance with the retained federal obligations.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill creates a trade-off between granting local political and logistical control of the site and preserving the federal government’s ongoing environmental duties, particularly groundwater remediation and public health protections, which require continued federal oversight and clear regulatory alignment.
A central tension in this transfer is balancing local stewardship with federal environmental obligations. While the conveyance would remove federal ownership from the Moab site, the United States would retain critical water rights and continue to enforce groundwater and tailings remediation responsibilities under federal law.
The prohibition on reconveyance prevents local ownership from being redistributed to private actors, which could otherwise erode the intended public stewardship model. The arrangement relies on ongoing interagency coordination (DOE, NRC, EPA, and state regulators) to ensure that health and safety standards are maintained during and after the transfer, including groundwater protection and access to wells within the site footprint.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.