HB 2791, the Homes for Heroes Act, amends title 38 U.S.C. to raise the maximum housing loan guaranty entitlement for certain veterans from 25 percent to 37.5 percent of the Freddie Mac conforming loan limit. It also overhauls the loan-fee structure for Interest Rate Reduction Refinancing Loans (IRRRL), establishing a period-based fee schedule with specific rates tied to closing dates from 2025 through 2035.
The bill preserves the overall structure of the VA loan program while expanding access to larger loans and adjusting refinancing costs.
At a Glance
What It Does
The entitlement cap for VA-backed housing loans is increased to 37.5% of Freddie Mac’s conforming loan limit. In addition, the IRRRL fee schedule is rewritten to a tiered, date-based structure for loans closed between 2025 and 2035.
Who It Affects
Veterans using VA home loans, VA loan lenders, and the VA’s loan-guaranty program staff. Secondary-market players like Freddie Mac—whose conforming loan limit serves as the entitlement benchmark—also participate in the changed framework.
Why It Matters
The higher entitlement expands home-buying capacity for eligible veterans, potentially increasing loan origination volume. The new IRRRL fee schedule changes refinancing costs over time and will influence borrower decisions and lender pricing strategies.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Homes for Heroes Act makes two core changes to the VA home loan program. First, it raises the maximum guaranty that the Department of Veterans Affairs can provide for a veteran’s housing loan from 25% to 37.5% of the Freddie Mac conforming loan limit.
That linkage to Freddie Mac’s limit ties the VA guarantee to a private-market benchmark and effectively increases the size of loans a veteran can obtain with VA backing. Second, the act rewrites the refinancing fee table for Interest Rate Reduction Refinancing Loans (IRRRL), introducing a five-window, period-based fee schedule.
Each window—ranging from 2025 through 2035—has its own fee rate, and the schedule replaces the previous flat or static structure. The changes are targeted at increasing veteran access to larger, affordable loans while ensuring the program continues to recover its costs through fees.
Together, these provisions adjust both the availability and cost of VA-backed financing. By enabling larger entitlements, the bill aims to broaden homeownership opportunities for veterans.
The tiered IRRRL fees introduce a predictable, time-bound cost structure for refinances, which could influence refinancing activity and lender pricing decisions over the next decade. The act retains the current program architecture, focusing changes on entitlement and refinancing costs rather than on other VA loan features.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill increases the VA loan guaranty entitlement to 37.5% of the Freddie Mac conforming loan limit (up from 25%).
The entitlement uses Freddie Mac’s conforming loan limit as the benchmark for the guaranty amount.
IRRRL refinancing loan fees are replaced with a five-period, date-based schedule.
The new IRRRL fee windows apply to loans closed within defined dates from 2025 to 2035 (and beyond).
The act is titled the Homes for Heroes Act.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
Section 1 designates the act as the “Homes for Heroes Act,” providing a formal citation. This enables consistent reference across future amendments and VA program materials.
Increase to Maximum Amount of Housing Loan Guaranty Entitlement
Section 2 amends 38 U.S.C. 3703(a)(1)(C) to raise the maximum VA loan guaranty entitlement from 25% to 37.5% of Freddie Mac’s conforming loan limit. This change expands the loan size that can be guaranteed to eligible veterans, tying the VA guarantee to a private-market benchmark and increasing potential loan limits within the existing program framework.
Adjustment of Fees for Interest Rate Reduction Refinancing (IRRRL) Housing Loans
Section 3 revises the loan-fee table in 38 U.S.C. 3729(b)(2) by striking the existing row for IRRRLs and inserting a new, period-based schedule. The new structure sets distinct IRRRL fees for loans closed in specific windows (2025–2025, 2025–2027, 2027–2031, 2031–2035, and 2035+), with rates listed as 0.50%, 0.25%, 0.50%, 0.75%, and 0.50% respectively for the relevant periods. This aligns refinancing costs with a forward-looking schedule rather than a single, static rate.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Housing across all five countries.
Explore Housing in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Veterans with eligible VA loan entitlements who can access larger guaranteed loan amounts, enabling more flexible home-purchase options.
- Lenders and mortgage brokers originating VA loans, who may see expanded borrower pools and increased origination volumes.
- Real estate professionals and housing counselors serving veteran clients, who gain larger financing opportunities to close deals.
- VA loan-guaranty program staff and operations, who will implement the higher entitlement and related changes.
- Freddie Mac and other market participants using the conforming loan limit as a benchmark, which underpins the entitlement framework.
Who Bears the Cost
- The VA loan-guaranty program could face higher exposure if more veterans take larger guaranteed loans.
- Taxpayers and federal budgets if the higher guarantee increases long-run default costs or requires additional subsidies.
- Lenders may incur compliance and pricing adjustments to reflect the new IRRRL fee schedule.
- Borrowers refinancing in certain windows could face higher IRRRL fees during those periods.
- Administrative costs for implementing and auditing the expanded program across VA and participating lenders.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing expanded homeownership opportunities for veterans against the risk that larger guarantees and variable refinancing fees will raise the VA loan program’s overall cost. The act attempts to align costs with private-market benchmarks while preserving access, but the net effect on loan volumes, borrower costs, and program finances remains contingent on market responses and future appropriations.
The act’s core ambition—expanding veteran access to home financing—competes with the need to maintain program solvency and cost recovery. The entitlement increase raises the scale of guarantees the VA must back, potentially elevating exposure if loan performance deteriorates or if market conditions shift.
The period-based IRRRL fee structure seeks to offset these costs by tying fees to closing dates, but it introduces a dynamic pricing wrinkle that can affect refinancing timing and borrower decisions across different years. Implementation will require careful calibration of lender pricing, public messaging to veterans, and ongoing monitoring of default experience and program costs.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.