The National Energy Dominance Council Act of 2025 would create a National Energy Dominance Council within the Executive Office of the President. The Council would be chaired by the Secretary of the Interior and would include key cabinet officials and agency heads to advise the President on energy production, regulation, and export policy, and to develop a comprehensive strategy to expand energy output.
It also directs interagency coordination and a defined action plan to streamline permitting and accelerate energy projects.
The bill assigns the Council a central role in shaping policy to prioritize energy production, reduce red tape, and encourage private investment across all energy sectors, while coordinating with other policy offices and reporting to the White House Chief of Staff. It also expands the National Security Council by adding the Secretary of the Interior as a representative, signaling a broader energy-security lens within national security deliberations.
At a Glance
What It Does
Establishes the National Energy Dominance Council in the Executive Office of the President, enumerates its membership, and sets duties to advise on energy strategy and to produce a National Energy Dominance Strategy. It requires a 100-day review and ongoing interagency coordination.
Who It Affects
Federal agencies listed in the bill (Interior, Energy, EPA, etc.), the President’s policy staff, and private-energy producers, lenders, and infrastructure developers affected by energy policy and permitting decisions.
Why It Matters
Creates a centralized, cross-agency mechanism to accelerate energy production, reduce regulatory barriers, and align federal actions with a unified energy strategy, with potential implications for energy security, pricing, and infrastructure development.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates a new National Energy Dominance Council inside the Executive Office of the President. The Council consists of 20 named federal leaders, including the Interior Secretary as Chair and the Energy Secretary as Vice Chair, plus other cabinet secretaries and designated agency heads.
Its core job is to advise the President on how to increase energy production and improve processes around energy permitting, generation, distribution, and export. It also aims to harmonize energy policy across agencies to support a broader energy-dominance objective, including critical minerals.
The Council is tasked with developing the National Energy Dominance Strategy, which emphasizes cutting red tape, eliminating unwarranted regulation, boosting private investment in energy across sectors, and prioritizing innovation. To operationalize this, the Council will coordinate with key policy offices and request information from agencies as needed to inform its strategy and actions.
A notable mechanism is a 100‑day requirement after enactment: the Council must review markets critical to reliable energy for homes, cars, and factories, and solicit feedback from state, local, and Tribal governments as well as private sector actors. It should also advise on concrete agency actions to accelerate energy production, such as expanding electricity capacity, reactivating closed plants, deploying Small Modular Reactors, and speeding approvals for energy infrastructure, including pipelines in underserved regions.
Finally, the bill expands coordination with national-security structures by representing Interior on the National Security Council.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Council is established within the Executive Office of the President and chaired by the Secretary of the Interior.
There are 20 named members, with the Energy Secretary as Vice Chair and other senior officials designated by the President.
The Council’s duties include advising on energy production, regulation, and export policy, and developing a National Energy Dominance Strategy.
Within 100 days, the Council must review critical energy markets and solicit feedback from subnational governments and private sector actors to inform action.
The bill adds the Secretary of the Interior to National Security Council representation, signaling a broader energy-security focus.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Establishment within the White House
There is established within the Executive Office of the President the National Energy Dominance Council. The Council’s role is to coordinate energy policy activity at the highest level, drawing on authority and data from across federal agencies to advance a unified strategy for energy production and security.
Membership
The Council shall consist of 20 members, including the Secretary of the Interior (Chair) and the Secretary of Energy (Vice Chair), plus the Administrator of the EPA and senior policy officials from multiple agencies. The President may designate additional executive department or agency heads as needed. This structure ensures cross-cutting perspectives from energy, environment, economy, defense, and security perspectives.
Duties
The Council advises the President on how to increase energy production and streamline related processes. It prepares a National Energy Dominance Strategy, focusing on reducing red tape, eliminating unnecessary regulation, boosting private investment, and fostering innovation. It also, within existing authorities, identifies actions agencies can take to prioritize energy production and to coordinate policy across departments.
Coordination
In carrying out its duties, the Council coordinates with the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, Economic Policy, and National Security Affairs. It reports to the White House Chief of Staff, establishing a clear governance channel for interagency guidance and accountability.
Meetings
The Chair convenes and presides over Council meetings, in consultation with the White House Chief of Staff. In the Chair’s absence, the Vice Chair presides. This arrangement ensures continuity and steady leadership of policy discussions.
Administration
The Council will have staff and funding as necessary to perform its duties. It may request information and assistance from any agency relevant to policy affecting energy dominance, and those agencies must cooperate with reasonable requests.
Table of Contents amendment
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 is amended to insert Sec. 1408, creating the cross-cutting energy policy framework described above.
Representation on National Security Council
Section 101(c)(1) of the National Security Act is amended to insert the Secretary of the Interior after the Secretary of Energy, ensuring that energy policy and security considerations are integrated into national security deliberations.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Energy across all five countries.
Explore Energy in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- The President and White House policy teams gain a centralized, strategic hub for energy policy and execution.
- Private-energy producers and investors may benefit from clearer strategy, regulatory alignment, and accelerated permitting pathways.
- Energy infrastructure developers and utilities could see faster project approvals and coordinated federal support for critical projects.
- Federal agencies gain a formal mechanism to align objectives and share information to support energy dominance goals.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal agencies will incur coordination costs and potential administrative overhead as they align to new reporting and information-sharing requirements.
- States, local governments, and Tribal governments may face evolving expectations and consultation requirements as the Council seeks feedback and sets priorities.
- Taxpayers could bear the cost of implementing enhanced interagency coordination and any policy shifts that affect energy subsidies, incentives, or regulations.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Centralized executive leadership for energy dominance versus preserving interagency deliberation, environmental safeguards, and subnational sovereignty.
The bill foregrounds a centralized executive-branch mechanism for energy dominance, but that centralization raises implementation and democratic-accountability questions. By placing the Council within the Executive Office of the President and charging it with a comprehensive strategy and rapid-action objectives, the bill reduces the traditional interagency negotiation runway and could pressure agencies to align with a top-down energy agenda.
This could short-circuit state or local inputs in some policy areas and increase administrative costs for federal agencies tasked with providing information and compliance support.
There is also a tension between urgency in expanding energy production and the protections typically embedded in environmental, labor, and public health policy. While the bill calls for eliminating unnecessary regulation, it does not expressly detail funding, oversight, or sunset provisions for the Council.
The 100-day market review requires rapid engagement with multiple subnational actors, which may prove challenging given the diversity of energy markets and regulatory regimes across states and regions. Finally, adding Interior to the National Security Council expands the security framing of energy policy, but it also enlarges the risk surface for interagency friction and potential jurisdictional disputes between foreign-policy and domestic-resource goals.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.