The National Coal Council Act of 2025 directs the Secretary of Energy to reestablish the National Coal Council within the Department of Energy to provide advice and recommendations on matters relating to coal and the coal industry. It also makes the Council subject to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), with an explicit exception for section 1013, and requires the Council to operate in accordance with the charter filed with Congress on June 16, 2025.
By formalizing a formal advisory channel and applying FACA oversight, the bill aims to ensure structured industry input into DOE policy and transparent governance of the council’s activities.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Secretary of Energy must reestablish the National Coal Council within DOE and oversee its operation. The Council will be governed under FACA (title 5, chapter 10) with a carve-out for section 1013, following the charter filed June 16, 2025.
Who It Affects
Directly affects the DOE, the National Coal Council and its members (industry representatives), coal producers and suppliers, and entities engaging with DOE on coal policy.
Why It Matters
Creates a formal, transparent channel for coal-sector input into federal policy and ensures the council operates under a defined governance framework.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates a formal National Coal Council inside the Department of Energy to advise the Secretary on coal-related matters. It requires the Council to follow the Federal Advisory Committee Act, except for a specific section, and to operate according to the charter filed with Congress in mid-2025.
This arrangement provides a structured, transparent mechanism for industry input into energy policy while keeping the council aligned with existing governance practices. The text does not specify new funding, implying that any operational costs would come from existing DOE resources.
The measure is narrowly focused on establishing an advisory body and does not alter substantive coal policy or regulatory authority.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Secretary of Energy must reestablish the National Coal Council within DOE.
The Council is subject to FACA, with an explicit exception for section 1013.
The Council must operate consistent with the charter filed June 16, 2025.
The Council's remit is to advise the Secretary on coal and the coal industry.
The bill does not authorize new funding in its text.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
This section designates the act’s short title as the National Coal Council Act of 2025, creating a clear statutory label for reference in future DOE-advisor work and oversight.
Reestablishment of the National Coal Council
Section 2(a) directs the Secretary of Energy to reestablish the National Coal Council within the Department of Energy, in accordance with the charter filed with Congress on June 16, 2025. This codifies the council’s return to existence and its alignment with a preexisting governance framework.
FACA applicability
Section 2(b) provides that Chapter 10 of Title 5, U.S.C. (the Federal Advisory Committee Act) shall apply to the National Coal Council, except for section 1013. This creates formal transparency and procedural requirements for the council's operations and meetings.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Energy across all five countries.
Explore Energy in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- The Secretary of Energy and DOE staff gain a formal, structured channel for expert input on coal policy.
- National Coal Council members receive a statutorily recognized role and duties, reinforcing their governance and credibility.
- Coal producers, equipment suppliers, and coal-industry trade associations benefit from a defined avenue to influence DOE decisions and policy timing.
- Industry-focused researchers and policy analysts gain clearer access to DOE advisory processes and data channels.
Who Bears the Cost
- DOE must provide staff, meeting logistics, and recordkeeping to satisfy FACA requirements, implying incremental administrative costs.
- The federal budget may incur ongoing costs to support the council’s meetings and governance activities.
- Participation in the council can impose time and travel costs on industry representatives.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing transparent, rule-bound governance of a federal advisory council with the desire for timely, candid industry input that can influence energy policy without imposing unsustainable administrative burdens on the Department.
The bill’s emphasis on FACA oversight improves transparency, but it also imposes administrative demands on DOE and potential delays in advisory outcomes due to formal meeting and reporting requirements. The carve-out for section 1013 signals a possible concession to maintaining certain confidential or nonpublic aspects of the advisory process, though the exact implications of that carve-out are not specified in the text.
There is no funding authorization in the bill, so operational costs would need to be absorbed within existing DOE resources unless appropriations are provided elsewhere. These dynamics create a trade-off between transparent governance and the speed and candor often valuable in industry policy discussions.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.