The bill designates the United States Postal Service facility at 80 Prospect Street in Avon, New York, as the "Officer Anthony Mazurkiewicz Memorial Post Office Building" and directs that references in federal laws, maps, regulations, documents, and records to that facility be read as references to the new name. The text is narrowly focused: it creates a formal name for the building and contains a clause to update federal references.
This measure matters because it triggers administrative work across federal and local systems — signage, mapping databases, and official federal records — without authorizing funds. For officials and compliance officers, the operative questions are who implements the name change, how recordkeeping and addresses are updated, and which agencies absorb the costs and operational tasks that follow a naming act like this one.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill assigns a memorial name to a specified USPS building in Avon, New York, and instructs that any existing or future federal reference to that facility is to be understood as referring to the new name. It does not appropriate money, alter property ownership, or change USPS operational authority.
Who It Affects
Primary effects fall on the USPS for implementing signage and internal records; federal agencies that reference the facility in laws, regulations, or maps; and local entities (municipal mapping, emergency services, and the family/community of the honoree).
Why It Matters
Naming bills are short but consequential: they create obligations to update federal and state databases and public-facing materials, establish an official memorial that can carry symbolic and civic weight, and set an administrative precedent for how small, local naming requests are handled at the federal level.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill is narrowly drafted and performs two discrete legal acts. First, it gives the USPS facility located at 80 Prospect Street in Avon, NY, a permanent, formal name: the Officer Anthony Mazurkiewicz Memorial Post Office Building.
That name becomes the official designation for the property in federal discourse.
Second, the bill contains a references clause that automatically treats any federal law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record that mentions the facility as referring to it by the new name. That clause creates a legal trail so Congress does not need to amend every single reference throughout the United States Code or other federal materials; instead, the bill's text updates the facility’s label in situ.Practically, the designation does not change USPS ownership, staffing, hours, postal routes, or mail-delivery protocols.
Implementation falls to the USPS and other agencies that maintain authoritative federal datasets: physical signage, the USPS official list of facilities, federal GIS/mapping services, and any regulations or guidance that cite the facility. The bill contains no appropriations, so agencies must absorb any costs from existing resources or seek separate funding.Because the text provides no implementation timetable, agencies will set their own timelines for updating signs, maps, and records.
The designation creates a permanent public name unless a later statute repeals or supersedes it; the bill does not include procedures for future removal or renaming should circumstances change.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill designates the USPS facility at 80 Prospect Street, Avon, NY, as the "Officer Anthony Mazurkiewicz Memorial Post Office Building.", A references clause directs that any federal law, map, regulation, document, paper, or record referring to that facility will be deemed to refer to the new name.
The measure contains no appropriation or authorization of funds for signage, database updates, or other implementation costs.
The designation does not change USPS operational authority, property ownership, postal addresses, or delivery routes.
Implementation requires administrative updates (signage, USPS facility lists, mapping/GIS databases, and federal records), but the bill leaves timing and funding unspecified.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Formal designation of the Avon post office
This subsection states the core substance: it assigns the memorial name to the specific USPS facility at 80 Prospect Street in Avon, New York. For all practical purposes, this makes the name official for ceremonial, commemorative, and administrative uses. The provision is absolute — it doesn't provide conditional language or sunset clauses — so the name becomes part of the federal record until a later law changes it.
References clause updating federal materials
Subsection (b) operates as a cross-reference device: instead of amending every statute or federal document that mentions the facility, the bill declares that any existing or future federal reference to the facility is to be treated as referring to the new memorial name. That mechanism simplifies statutory drafting but also means agencies and recordkeepers must interpret legacy citations as pointing to the renamed site when producing official materials.
Standard enactment language without implementation detail
The bill includes the usual enacting clause ('Be it enacted...') and minimal technical text; it does not include implementation deadlines, a required coordination mechanism between USPS and other federal or local agencies, or any appropriation language. The lack of implementation detail shifts responsibility to agency practice and internal guidance rather than statutory instruction.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Family and community of Officer Anthony Mazurkiewicz — the designation provides an official, lasting public memorial recognizing the officer’s service and creates a focal point for remembrance.
- Town of Avon and local civic groups — the name elevates local visibility and can be used in commemorative programming, local tourism materials, and community events.
- Law enforcement community in the region — the memorial name offers formal recognition and can support morale and public acknowledgement of fallen officers.
- Historical and commemorative organizations — the bill adds a formal federal designation they can document and reference in registries of memorials.
Who Bears the Cost
- United States Postal Service — USPS will likely bear costs for new exterior signage, internal facility lists, website updates, and any stationery or materials that reference the facility’s name.
- Federal agencies maintaining maps and databases (e.g., GSA, federal GIS services) — these organizations must update records and systems to reflect the new name, absorbing administrative time and technical effort.
- Local governments and emergency services — while addresses won’t necessarily change, local GIS and mapping services may need updates to keep records consistent; smaller municipalities may lack budgeted resources for such administrative tasks.
- Congressional and federal recordkeepers — offices that produce documents, indexes, or archival materials will need to reconcile legacy references with the new statutory designation, adding modest workload without new funding.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances two legitimate aims — honoring an individual through an enduring federal commemoration and keeping congressional action simple and targeted — against the administrative reality that naming a federal facility imposes real costs and coordination obligations across agencies, with no funding or removal process specified.
The bill’s simplicity is also its central implementation challenge. By creating a binding name and a broad references clause without providing funding or scheduling, it leaves it to USPS and other federal and local actors to decide how and when to update signage, databases, and materials.
That can produce inconsistent rollouts — one agency may update digital maps quickly while another leaves paper-based documents unchanged — potentially causing temporary confusion for record users.
Another unresolved issue is removal or dispute resolution. The statute makes the name permanent absent future legislation, but it contains no mechanism for administrative renaming, removal, or reassessment if the commemoration becomes controversial or if stakeholders seek a different designation.
Finally, although the references clause simplifies statutory drafting, it can obscure where and how the facility is cited across federal materials; lawyers and archivists will need to track the cross-reference to ensure accurate historical or legal interpretation.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.