The Protecting American Farmland Act would prohibit the head of a Federal agency from using federal funds to support solar projects that convert prime farmland. It also expands land-use protections by excluding prime farmland from several clean-energy tax credits, making it harder to finance and deploy solar facilities on land deemed prime farmland.
The bill defines key terms and lays out when these provisions take effect, signaling a policy choice to prioritize farmland preservation alongside energy development goals.
At a Glance
What It Does
It blocks federal funding, loans, and loan guarantees for covered solar energy projects that would convert prime farmland and adds new exclusions for prime farmland from multiple energy tax credits. It defines key terms like prime farmland and covered solar energy project to ground the prohibitions.
Who It Affects
Federal agencies, solar project developers, lenders, and owners of prime farmland are directly affected. Prime farmland definitions tie project eligibility to land-use classifications used by conservation programs.
Why It Matters
The bill shifts the cost-benefit calculus of solar deployment by protecting farmland. It sets a clear boundary between energy projects and land designated as prime farmland, potentially reducing farmland conversion and altering the economics of solar siting for developers and investors.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill places a substantive check on solar development by tying federal funding to farmland outcomes. Section 2 prohibits the head of any federal agency from using federal funds—whether as direct funding, loans, or loan guarantees—to carry out a covered solar energy project that would convert prime farmland.
The section also defines key terms: conversion is activity that renders farmland ineligible for agricultural production under the relevant state standard; a covered solar energy project is a ground-mounted solar facility intended to generate electricity for sale; a federal agency is any agency as defined in the applicable federal statute; and prime farmland is land described in the Farmland Protection Policy Act.
Beyond the funding ban, the bill expands protections by excluding prime farmland from several federal tax incentives tied to clean energy. Those include the residential clean energy credit (Section 25D), the Renewable Electricity Production Credit (Section 45), the Clean Electricity Production Credit (Section 45Y), and energy-related investment credits (Sections 48 and 48E).
Each exclusion is paired with a definition of prime farmland and an effective date: the changes apply to property placed in service after enactment. Taken together, these provisions limit the tax advantages for solar facilities sited on prime farmland, shaping project economics and siting choices.The practical effect is to slow or deter solar development on land classified as prime farmland unless land-use classifications change or policy compromises are reached.
While aimed at farmland preservation, developers and financiers may face higher complexity and potential cost increases when evaluating prime farmland sites. The bill does not address non-prime farmland siting in detail, leaving the broader solar policy landscape to be determined through future negotiations and rulemaking.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill forbids federal funds, loans, or loan guarantees for a solar project that would convert prime farmland.
Prime farmland is defined by reference to the Farmland Protection Policy Act and related standards.
Residential clean energy credits (25D) exclude solar properties placed on prime farmland after enactment.
Prime farmland solar facilities are excluded from the Renewable Electricity Production Credit (45) and from the Clean Electricity Production Credit (45Y).
Additional exclusions extend to other energy credits and investments (Sections 48 and 48E) for property placed in service on prime farmland.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Prohibition on agency funding for covered solar energy projects that would convert prime farmland
The head of a Federal agency may not use federal funds, including by providing funds, a loan, or a loan guarantee, to carry out a covered solar energy project that would result in the conversion of prime farmland. The section defines a covered solar energy project as a ground-mounted solar facility intended to generate electricity for sale. Prime farmland is defined with reference to the Farmland Protection Policy Act to anchor the land-use standard. This creates a hard ceiling on federal support for siting solar where the land would lose eligibility for agricultural production.
Exclusion of property placed in service on prime farmland from residential clean energy credit
Section 25D(e) is amended to add a new paragraph clarifying that qualified solar property expenditures placed in service on prime farmland are not eligible for the residential clean energy credit. The definition of prime farmland ties to the Farmland Protection Policy Act. The provision is prospective, applying to property placed in service after enactment, thereby excluding prime farmland from this credit going forward.
Exclusion of facilities located on prime farmland from Renewable Electricity Production Credit
Section 45(e) gains a new paragraph excluding solar energy facilities on prime farmland from the definition of qualified facility. The effect is that solar projects located on prime farmland cannot claim the Renewable Electricity Production Credit. The standard for prime farmland remains anchored to the Farmland Protection Policy Act.
Exclusion of facilities located on prime farmland from Clean Electricity Production Credit
Section 45Y(g) adds a paragraph excluding solar facilities located on prime farmland from the definition of qualified facility under the clean electricity production credit. This further narrows eligibility for incentives tied to clean electricity production for land classified as prime farmland, with the same effective-date treatment as other provisions.
Exclusion of property placed in service on prime farmland from energy credit
Section 48(a)(3) is amended to insert prime farmland as an ineligible site for the energy credit. This means property placed in service on prime farmland cannot claim that credit, aligning with the broader farmland-protection aim through the tax system.
Exclusion of property placed in service on prime farmland from the energy investment credit (48E)
Section 48E(d) is amended to add a provision excluding expenditures allocable to solar energy property placed on prime farmland from the energy investment credit. The practical effect mirrors other exclusions: solar projects on prime farmland lose access to this credit as well, effective for property placed in service after enactment.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Agriculture across all five countries.
Explore Agriculture in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Owners and operators of prime farmland gain protection against being converted for solar projects, preserving agricultural use and income in rural areas.
- Farmland preservation organizations and rural land-use advocates gain a clearer policy boundary that prioritizes agricultural viability.
- Local agricultural economies that rely on farmland income and employment may benefit from reduced land-use disruption and longer-term productivity of farmland.
- State and local land-use agencies focused on conservation can point to a federal incentive alignment that favors preservation.
Who Bears the Cost
- Solar developers and project financiers face higher siting barriers and potentially higher costs if prime farmland sites are avoided or re-evaluated.
- Federal agencies may incur higher project-risk considerations when funding solar initiatives that could involve prime farmland.
- Tax equity investors and developers could see reduced opportunities for credits tied to solar facilities sited on prime farmland, affecting project economics.
- Regions with a high share of prime farmland could experience slower solar deployment, potentially impacting local energy timelines and job creation.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing farmland preservation with the need to expand solar energy capacity. The bill protects farmland by restricting funding and tax incentives for solar projects on prime land, but that protection may slow the deployment of solar infrastructure in regions where prime farmland is physically well-suited for solar generation. Policymakers must weigh the value of agricultural productivity against the goals of clean energy expansion.
The bill creates a protective bulwark around prime farmland by linking federal funding and tax incentives to land-use classifications. While this reduces the risk of agricultural land conversion, it also raises questions about the pace and geography of solar deployment, particularly in rural areas where prime farmland overlaps with suitable solar resources.
Implementation will hinge on consistent land-use classifications and the interplay with existing conservation programs, which could lead to disputes over land eligibility and siting. The expansive set of exclusions also raises concerns about the cumulative impact on solar growth and whether contractors might reallocate capacity to non-prime lands or adjacent parcels, potentially affecting energy costs and reliability in the longer term.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.