The Protecting American Farmland Act would prohibit the head of any federal agency from using federal funds (including loans or loan guarantees) to carry out a covered solar energy project that would convert prime farmland. It also bars property placed in service on prime farmland from several energy-related tax credits.
The bill defines key terms (conversion, covered solar energy project, prime farmland) by reference to existing farmland and energy policy laws, and it sets an effective date for the amendments. The core aim is to prevent federal dollars from supporting solar development on land that meets the government’s standards for prime agricultural use, while aligning tax incentives to exclude such land from eligible credits.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill prohibits federal funding for covered solar energy projects that would convert prime farmland and expands prime-farmland exclusions to several clean-energy tax credits. It defines conversion and prime farmland and ties the scope to the Farmland Protection Policy Act.
Who It Affects
Federal agencies and solar developers seeking federal funds, as well as property owners with prime farmland who might otherwise be targets for solar projects, and developers seeking to monetize energy tax credits.
Why It Matters
It signals a formal policy choice to preserve farmland by restricting both direct funding for certain solar projects and the tax incentives that would otherwise encourage such development on prime land. This reshapes where solar capacity can be financed and incentivized.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill targets solar energy projects that would reduce the land’s agricultural viability by placing them on prime farmland. It forbids the head of a federal agency from using federal funds—whether as grants, loans, or loan guarantees—to support any covered solar energy project that would cause farmland to fail the government’s standards for agricultural production.
It defines covered solar energy projects as ground-mounted solar facilities intended to generate electricity primarily for sale, and it defines prime farmland by referencing the Farmland Protection Policy Act’s criteria. The bill also tightens financial incentives by excluding solar property expenditures and solar facilities located on prime farmland from several major clean-energy tax credits, including residential credits and production credits, with effective dates tied to enactment.
Overall, it pairs a funding prohibition with a broad exclusion of prime farmland from energy-related tax benefits, creating a land-use constraint on federal energy policies.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The head of a federal agency may not use federal funds to carry out a covered solar energy project that would convert prime farmland.
Prime farmland is defined by the Farmland Protection Policy Act’s criteria (7 U.S.C. 4201(c)(1)(A)).
A covered solar energy project is a ground-mounted facility aimed at generating electricity for sale.
Prime farmland exclusions apply to multiple tax credits: 25D, 45, 45Y, 48, and 48E, when the facility is located on prime farmland.
The amendments take effect for property placed in service after enactment.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Prohibition on Federal Funding for Covered Solar Energy Projects on Prime Farmland
This section bars the head of a Federal agency from using federal funds to carry out a covered solar energy project that would convert prime farmland. It covers direct funding as well as loans or loan guarantees. The prohibition is tied to the project’s impact on farmland meeting agricultural-use standards under the Farmland Protection Policy Act. This creates a hard boundary for federal energy finance when prime farmland would be affected, and it emphasizes land preservation as a constraint on solar deployment.
Exclusion of Prime Farmland from Residential Clean Energy Credit
Section 25D(e) is amended to remove from eligibility any qualified solar electric property expenditures properly allocable to property placed in service on prime farmland. The definition of prime farmland again references the Farmland Protection Policy Act, reinforcing that farmland with prime status is excluded from the residential clean energy credit. The change applies to property placed in service after the enactment date.
Exclusion of Prime Farmland from Renewable Electricity Production Credit
Section 45(e) is amended to exclude solar facilities located on prime farmland from the definition of a qualified facility for the Renewable Electricity Production Credit. This ensures projects on prime farmland cannot qualify for this production-based credit, potentially reducing the economic attractiveness of siting solar on such land.
Exclusion from Clean Electricity Production Credit
Section 45Y(g) is amended to exclude solar facilities located on prime farmland from the Clean Electricity Production Credit. The amendment mirrors other credit exclusions and applies to facilities placed in service after enactment, ensuring consistency across tax-credit incentives for prime-land projects.
Exclusion from Energy Credit
Section 48(a)(3) is amended to insert prime farmland as a disqualifying factor for energy-related credits. Expenditures tied to facilities on prime farmland would not be eligible for the energy credit, and the provision takes effect for property placed in service after enactment.
Exclusion from Clean Electricity Investment Credit
Section 48E(d) is amended to exclude solar facilities located on prime farmland from the Clean Electricity Investment Credit. The exclusion cleanly aligns investment-credit rules with the prime-farmland restriction, applying to qualified investments for facilities placed in service after enactment.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Farmers and ranchers who own prime farmland and want to avoid eligible solar projects encroaching on their land, preserving agricultural viability and income.
- Farmland conservation organizations and land trusts that steward and protect prime farmland from conversion to energy projects.
- State and local agricultural agencies tasked with preserving farmland and enforcing the Farmland Protection Policy Act.
- Rural communities and counties whose economic base depends on stable agricultural land use and preservation.
Who Bears the Cost
- Solar project developers seeking federal funds or tax credits for prime-land projects, whose feasibility may be reduced by the restrictions.
- Lenders and investors in solar projects that would be disqualified from federal funding or tax credits when located on prime farmland.
- Federal agencies that must administer and enforce the funding prohibition and credit exclusions, incurring administrative costs.
- Landowners who might otherwise monetize prime farmland through solar leasing but are constrained by the bill’s prohibitions.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing the urgency of expanding clean energy with the goal of preserving prime farmland. Limiting federal support and tax credits for solar on prime land protects agricultural land but may constrain solar development at a time of strong energy transition incentives, forcing developers to seek non-prime sites or alternative technologies. The bill asks policymakers to weigh long-term land stewardship against near-term energy and economic objectives.
The bill creates a deliberate trade-off between renewable energy deployment and farmland protection. By tying federal funding and multiple energy-related tax credits to the land-use status of ‘prime farmland,’ it could slow solar development on agricultural land and redirect investment to non-prime sites.
A practical challenge will be ensuring consistent application of the prime farmland definition across agencies and ensuring that projects can be re-sited or redesigned to avoid prime land. There is also a potential interaction with existing state and private financing structures, which could dampen the overall pace of solar expansion even as farmland preservation gains protection.
Finally, the bill relies on amendments to multiple tax code provisions, which may raise questions about transitional rules, cross-credit interactions, and potential unintended tax consequences for mixed-use or multi-acre projects.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.