This bill changes the official name of the United States Postal Service facility at 340 East 1st Street in Tustin, California, to the "Ursula Ellen Kennedy Post Office Building" and directs that any federal reference to that facility be treated as a reference to the new name. The text contains two short provisions: a designation clause and a references clause that applies across laws, maps, regulations, and records.
For most readers the bill is symbolic: it does not alter postal operations, create new programs, or appropriate funds. Its practical impacts are administrative — federal and local records, signage, and databases may need one-time updates — and it follows a common congressional practice of honoring individuals through facility names.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill designates a specific USPS facility in Tustin, CA, by name and includes a clause that any existing federal reference to that facility shall be read as referencing the new name. It contains no provisions authorizing spending or directing operational changes.
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties are the United States Postal Service, federal agencies that maintain records and maps, and local authorities or vendors that manage signage and address databases for Tustin. The designation also affects anyone citing or searching federal documents that reference the facility.
Why It Matters
Naming bills are primarily symbolic but trigger practical recordkeeping work across government and private mapping/GIS systems. Compliance officers, facilities managers, and local officials should note the administrative updates that follow even when the statute includes no funding authorization.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill contains two short, discrete legal moves. First, it states that the USPS facility at 340 East 1st Street in Tustin, California, shall formally be known as the "Ursula Ellen Kennedy Post Office Building." That is the operative act: a change of the building's official, statutory name.
Second, the bill includes a references clause: any mention of the facility in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other federal record will be 'deemed to be a reference' to the new name. That clause is intended to avoid ambiguity in citations and ensures the new name applies across federal instruments that reference the location.The statute is silent about implementation mechanics such as who pays for new signage, whether the USPS must update internal systems by a specific date, or whether the name change affects mailing addresses.
Because there is no appropriation or directive to the Postal Service to spend funds, any physical or electronic updates will be handled under existing USPS administrative authorities and budgeting processes.Practically, this type of bill creates a short checklist for agencies and local partners: update federal property inventories, reflect the new name in public-facing databases and maps, and decide whether to replace signage. The bill does not change property ownership, operations, service levels, or legal status beyond the name and the cross-reference rule.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill designates the USPS facility at 340 East 1st Street, Tustin, California, as the "Ursula Ellen Kennedy Post Office Building.", It contains a references clause declaring that any federal law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record referring to that facility shall be deemed to refer to the new name.
The statute does not appropriate funds or direct the Postal Service to pay for signage, updates, or other implementation costs.
The bill was introduced by Representative Young Kim and referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
The change is nominal and administrative: it alters statutory and official reference language but does not modify USPS operations or property rights.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Official designation of the facility
This provision unambiguously assigns the name "Ursula Ellen Kennedy Post Office Building" to the USPS facility at the listed Tustin address. Its legal effect is to create a statutory name; once enacted, the name becomes the formal identifier for that federal property. Practically, it is the text that a clerk or database manager will use when updating inventories, plaques, or official descriptions.
Cross-reference rule for federal records
Section 1(b) says that any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other United States record to the facility shall be deemed to be a reference to the new name. That clause prevents drafting or citation issues where older instruments use the prior description. It operates as a textual reconciliation device rather than as a substantive legal change to prior statutes or regulations.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Family and supporters of Ursula Ellen Kennedy — receive official federal recognition via a named federal building, which is the bill's primary symbolic beneficiary.
- City of Tustin and local civic groups — gain a named landmark that may be used for community identity, ceremonies, and local history materials.
- Historical or commemorative organizations — obtain a durable federal designation that can support preservation or interpretive efforts tied to the honoree.
Who Bears the Cost
- United States Postal Service — may face one-time administrative tasks (signage, internal records, property inventories) and associated costs, even though the bill does not appropriate funds.
- Federal agencies and records managers — must update statutes, maps, databases, and regulatory references to reflect the new name, which imposes staff time and administrative expense.
- Local governments, mapping vendors, and third-party GIS providers — will need to reconcile local address and mapping systems with the new federal reference where applicable.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is symbolic recognition versus administrative consequence: Congress can honor individuals quickly by naming federal facilities, but doing so imposes diffuse administrative and financial tasks on agencies and local partners without providing dedicated funding or operational direction.
The bill is tightly focused and intentionally minimal, but that brevity creates practical questions. Because it does not authorize funding, the Postal Service must absorb any costs for new signage or database updates under existing budgets, which can delay physical changes or shift costs to maintenance appropriations.
The statute's silence about addressing and operational effects leaves open whether mailing addresses, emergency-response systems, or commercial map databases should or will change the facility's address label.
The broad references clause is useful for citation clarity but also raises implementation workload: federal statutes, regulations, and archived records that mention the facility may technically be 'deemed' to reference the new name without amendment, yet searchable federal repositories and legal research platforms will still show older text. That gap can create temporary confusion for compliance officers, litigators, and the public.
More broadly, repeated use of single-building naming bills raises a policy question about congressional bandwidth and consistency—Congress passes many commemorative names with no centralized criteria, which burdens agencies with piecemeal updates and creates potential fairness concerns among communities seeking recognition.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.