This bill amends Titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act to deliver a package of payment increases, targeted adjustments, and regulatory relief for rural health providers. It exempts certain rural hospitals from Medicare sequestration, raises bad-debt reimbursement for rural hospitals and CAHs, extends and rebases several special-payment programs (low-volume, Medicare-dependent, and sole community hospitals), and implements area wage index adjustments to boost low-wage hospitals.
Beyond rates, the bill makes permanent rural-specific payment enhancements for ground ambulance and telehealth services for FQHCs/RHCs, restores state authority to waive the 35-mile rule for limited critical access hospital (CAH) designations, removes the CAH 96-hour average inpatient requirement, equalizes certain CAH beneficiary copayments, and creates multi-year grants to support rural hospital transformation and conversions to alternate models (rural emergency hospitals, expanded clinics, etc.). For payers and providers, the package trades concentrated, targeted support for rural continuity of care against budget-neutral offsets and administrable limits that will create winners and losers at the margin.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill (1) carves out specific rural hospitals from Medicare sequestration and raises bad-debt reimbursement for rural hospitals and CAHs; (2) permanently continues increased payments for low-volume and Medicare-dependent hospitals and extended DSH treatment for some rural hospitals; (3) sets area wage-index adjustments including a low-wage boost and a 0.85 floor for non-frontier hospitals while directing CMS to ensure budget-neutrality.
Who It Affects
Critical access hospitals, sole community hospitals, Medicare-dependent and low-volume rural hospitals, rural ambulance providers, federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics using telehealth, State Offices of Rural Health, and rural beneficiaries who rely on these facilities for local access.
Why It Matters
The bill consolidates multiple rural policy levers—rate increases, index tweaks, regulatory waivers, and transformation grants—into one package designed to prevent closures and sustain emergency and outpatient access in thin-margin communities. For compliance officers and hospital CFOs, it creates new payment streams and certification pathways but also new administrative steps and caps.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Save America’s Rural Hospitals Act bundles payment increases, targeted indexing changes, regulatory relief, and grant funding to shore up rural hospital finances and local access. It permanently exempts specified rural hospitals from sequestration cuts to Medicare payments, raises the percentage of bad-debt reimbursement available to rural hospitals (and explicitly extends that treatment to CAHs), and extends prior temporary boosts that benefit Medicare-dependent, low-volume, and sole community hospitals.
Together those provisions raise revenue into provider budgets in ways designed to be durable rather than temporary stopgaps.
The bill changes how the hospital area wage index is applied. For hospitals below the 25th percentile it raises the index partway to the 25th percentile; for hospitals not in “frontier” states it imposes a 0.85 minimum area wage index while requiring the Secretary to set a maximum index so the net change is budget neutral.
The statutory language explicitly extends similar floor protections to outpatient department wage adjustments, and applies budget-neutrality guardrails that will force CMS to design offsets that reduce payments elsewhere or cap gains.On provider types, the bill permanently continues the higher Medicare reimbursement for ground ambulance services in rural areas and makes telehealth payment rules for FQHCs/RHCs more durable, although the telehealth provision directs CMS to make more detailed payment calculations for the post-emergency period. It restores state authority to certify certain facilities as CAHs even if they do not meet the 35-mile distance standard, but does so with limiting conditions (attestations, financial distress criteria) and numeric caps on new certifications.The bill also removes the CAH 96-hour average length-of-stay requirement and eliminates a physician certification element tied to that threshold, equalizes outpatient CAH beneficiary copayments to hospital levels (20 percent of the lesser of actual charge or the payment basis), and authorizes multi-year transformation grants—both smaller operational grants through State Offices of Rural Health and five-year transformation grants to support conversions to models such as rural emergency hospitals, expanded clinic operations, and integrated behavioral health.
Those grant programs carry application, State-support, and sustainability showing requirements.Implementation depends heavily on CMS rulemaking. Several provisions take effect 60 days after enactment or for cost-reporting periods beginning after that threshold, and the area wage index changes explicitly require rulemaking to preserve budget-neutrality—meaning CMS will have to decide which payments to constrain or how to layer offsets to keep aggregate outlays within statutory limits.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill exempts payments to specified rural hospitals (CAHs, sole community hospitals, Medicare-dependent small rural hospitals, and rural subsection (d) hospitals) from Medicare sequestration effective 60 days after enactment.
It increases bad-debt reimbursement for hospitals located in rural areas by an additional payment equal to 15 percent of the otherwise allowable amount and explicitly extends bad-debt reimbursement treatment to critical access hospitals for applicable cost reporting periods.
It permanently extends prior payment increases for Medicare-dependent hospitals and low-volume hospitals and continues disproportionate share (DSH) treatment for sole community hospitals and Medicare-dependent hospitals for discharges in FY2026 and beyond.
The bill directs two area-wage-index adjustments: a partial ‘boost’ for hospitals below the 25th percentile (moving them halfway toward the 25th percentile) and a 0.85 minimum area wage index for hospitals not in frontier states, with CMS required to set a maximum index to achieve budget neutrality.
States may certify certain financially distressed rural facilities as CAHs despite the 35-mile rule, but the statute caps new certifications (no more than 175 facilities nationally, no more than 10 per State, and not more than 20% of the 175 can be certain facility types) and requires attestation, financial history, and prompt CAH application filing.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Exclude specified rural hospitals from Medicare sequestration
The bill amends the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act to carve out payments under Medicare Part A and B for defined rural hospitals (CAHs, sole community hospitals, Medicare-dependent small rural hospitals, and certain subsection (d) hospitals in rural areas) from sequestration orders. Practically, CMS would not apply automatic sequestration percentage reductions to claims tied to those provider types after 60 days from enactment; CMS will need to operationalize which provider numbers and claim types qualify in claims processing and reconciliation.
Restore and expand bad-debt reimbursement for rural hospitals and CAHs
Statutory bad-debt reimbursement language is amended to add a 15% add-on for hospitals located in rural areas and to ensure critical access hospitals are included under the CAH bad-debt reimbursement treatment. This changes Medicare cost reporting and reimbursement calculations for hospitals that record patient bad debt, increasing recoverable amounts for eligible rural providers for cost reporting periods beginning more than 60 days after enactment.
Make permanent and rebase special rural hospital payment programs
These sections remove sunset dates and make permanent the payment methodologies that support Medicare-dependent hospitals (MDHs) and low-volume hospitals, extend some target-amount rebasing for MDHs and sole community hospitals, and adjust technical timing references to use fiscal year 2024 cost reporting periods for rebasing. The practical effect: providers that had been scheduled to lose special payment adjustments at expirations keep them indefinitely, and CMS must apply revised base periods when computing target amounts and payment limits.
Area wage index changes: low-wage boost and 0.85 floor with budget-neutral cap
This section codifies a boost for hospitals whose area wage index falls below the 25th percentile (moving the index halfway toward that percentile) and establishes a 0.85 minimum wage index for hospitals not in frontier states for inpatient and outpatient settings beginning in FY2026/2026 respectively. To preserve aggregate outlays, the Secretary must set a maximum area wage index through rulemaking to keep changes budget-neutral. That creates an explicit statutory requirement for CMS to design offsets or caps — a significant distributional decision that will determine winners and losers across regions.
Make permanent rural ambulance increase and extend telehealth payments for FQHCs/RHCs
The bill removes the temporary label from the rural ground ambulance payment increase and permanently continues those higher rates. It also revises telehealth payment authority for FQHCs and RHCs: it ties temporally to the emergency period language and directs CMS how to compute payment for the post-emergency period (effectively preserving enhanced telehealth treatment for those centers but requiring CMS to determine the appropriate payment basis thereafter). CMS will need to clarify how those payments interact with existing encounter-level rules and state Medicaid telehealth policies.
Restore State authority to waive 35‑mile CAH rule with conditions and caps
States can again certify as ‘necessary providers’ for CAH designation some hospitals that fail the 35-mile distance test, but only for specified facility types (SCHs, MDHs, certain low-volume hospitals, small subsection (d) hospitals and pre-existing facilities meeting CAH criteria). Certification requires State attestation, two consecutive years of negative operating margins (in most cases), submission of governance and sustainability plans, and a CAH application to CMS within 120 days of final regulations. The statute caps such certifications nationally (175 total) and by State (10), and limits how many can be flex-designated facility types (20% of 175). CMS must issue final regulations within 120 days.
Beneficiary copay parity, regulatory relief, and transformation grants
Title II equalizes CAH outpatient beneficiary cost sharing to 20% of the lesser of the hospital payment basis or actual charge. Title III removes the 96-hour average inpatient-length-of-stay requirement and a related physician certification requirement for CAHs and authorizes coverage of extended care services without a prior hospitalization requirement for certain hospitals. Title IV expands the Medicare rural hospital flexibility program to fund technical assistance and authorizes five-year rural transformation grants (with State Office of Rural Health partnership, local payer support letters, and sustainability plans) to facilitate conversions to alternate models and broader service integration.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Critical access hospitals (CAHs): Receive clearer statutory inclusion for improved bad‑debt reimbursement, are eligible for CAH re‑certification waivers in distressed circumstances, face fewer inpatient length-of-stay constraints, and benefit from parity in outpatient cost-sharing for beneficiaries.
- Medicare‑dependent, low‑volume, and sole community hospitals: Keep the special payment adjustments and DSH/target protections indefinitely, supporting margins in facilities with small volumes and high fixed costs.
- FQHCs/RHCs and rural ambulance providers: Gain more durable telehealth payment treatment and permanent elevated rural ground-ambulance reimbursement, strengthening outpatient and emergency transport finances.
- State Offices of Rural Health and rural health networks: Become primary vehicles for distributing operational and transformation grants and technical assistance, positioning them to lead local redesign and conversion projects.
- Rural beneficiaries and communities: Stand to preserve closer-to-home emergency, inpatient, and outpatient services and face potentially lower out-of-pocket exposure at CAH outpatient encounters.
Who Bears the Cost
- Medicare program finances and beneficiaries generally: The statute requires budget-neutrality guardrails for wage-index changes, meaning CMS will need to offset increases by reducing or capping payments elsewhere in the program or through distributional adjustments.
- Hospitals and regions with higher area wage indices (often urban or higher-wage hospitals): Could see reduced relative adjustments or new maximum caps on area wage indices as CMS sets offsets, shifting some dollars away from higher-wage areas to support low-wage rural hospitals.
- CMS and HHS administrative resources: Face accelerated rulemaking deadlines (e.g., 120-day CAH-rule requirement) and substantial claims‑processing changes to implement sequestration carve-outs, new payment add‑ons, and redesigned wage-index floors/caps.
- Rural providers converting to new models or pursuing CAH designation: Must prepare sustainability plans, attestation documentation, and apply within statutory timetables—requiring legal, financial, and operational resources that may be scarce in fragile hospitals.
- State Medicaid programs and private payers: May face indirect impacts from shifting provider viability and grant-funded transformations that alter local payer mixes or create transitional cost-shifting.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill confronts an unavoidable trade‑off: stabilize rural access quickly by concentrating new payments and regulatory flexibility on fragile providers, or maintain Medicare’s distributional status quo and program budget constraints — you cannot fully do both. Statutory boosts and waivers help keep local facilities open, but budget‑neutrality requirements and numeric caps force CMS to reallocate dollars and to ration special designations, producing winners and losers and raising implementation complexity.
Two design choices drive implementation risk. First, the statute requires budget neutrality for the area wage index changes and links the low-wage boost to an aggregate offset via a Secretary-set maximum index.
That forces CMS into a distributional trade-off: preserve aggregate Medicare outlays but reallocate payment power across hospitals. CMS will decide whether to blunt the maximum index, reduce other update factors, or apply carved‑out sequestration-like offsets.
Those design choices will determine which hospitals actually gain and which lose — the statute sets the destination but not the mechanics.
Second, the CAH 35‑mile waiver pathway is tightly constrained by numeric caps, attestation and financial‑distress criteria, and a 120-day application window after regulation. That creates potential rationing and timing pressure.
States and hospitals must prioritize a small number of candidates and prepare documentation quickly; otherwise, they risk exclusion. The requirement that many newly‑certified facilities apply for CAH status within 120 days could also create a rush to convert without fully vetted operational plans, ironically increasing short‑term instability.
Other unresolved questions include the telehealth payment formula after the emergency period (the statutory language ties payment to what the center “would have been paid had services been furnished without the use of a telecommunications system”), which leaves room for CMS interpretation about what constitutes equivalent payment for telehealth encounters. Finally, several provisions take effect after short statutory lags (60 days or “cost reporting periods beginning more than 60 days”); operationalizing those effective dates across claims, audits, and Medicare Administrative Contractor processes will be complex and could provoke disputes in cost reports and reconciliations.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.