The Rural Hospital Flexibility Act of 2025 amends title XVIII to strengthen Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility program grants and to broaden the universe of grant recipients. It adds new grant authorities to help state offices of rural health and eligible providers pursue innovative care models and to support quality improvement, population health, and behavioral health integration.
The bill also creates dedicated Rural Health Transformation Grants and Rural Emergency Hospital Technical Assistance to finance transitions to modern rural care models and to help hospitals pursue or maintain rural emergency hospital designation.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill expands the Rural Hospital Flexibility program by authorizing new grant categories and updating recipient structures. It creates Rural Health Transformation Grants (5-year) and Rural Emergency Hospital Technical Assistance to support transitions to new care models, including rural emergency hospitals and telehealth-enabled services, plus grants to carry out other grants via technical assistance and evaluation.
Who It Affects
State Offices of Rural Health, eligible rural health care providers (e.g., critical access hospitals, certified rural health clinics, rural nursing homes), rural health networks, and the communities they serve.
Why It Matters
It provides a formal, funded pathway for rural care modernization, behavioral health integration, and telehealth expansion, aiming to preserve access in sparsely populated areas and improve care quality.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill amends the Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility program by adding several new grant authorities and updating who can receive funds. A central feature is the creation of Rural Health Transformation Grants, designed as 5-year awards to State Offices of Rural Health and eligible rural health care providers to facilitate the transition to new models.
These models include rural emergency hospitals, extended stay clinics, freestanding emergency departments, rural health clinics, and integrated behavioral and oral health services, together with telehealth and other reforms responsive to changing rural health care needs. The grants require a clear plan for how they will help communities adapt and sustain improvements, and they must be supported by local organizations and payers such as Medicaid and private insurers.
The bill also authorizes Rural Emergency Hospital Technical Assistance grants to help facilities seeking designation as rural emergency hospitals, including the required application process. In addition, the Secretary may award grants to support carrying out other grants by providing technical assistance, data analysis, and evaluation.
Funds may be used for software and hardware purchases, staff training, and other delivery system reform activities identified as appropriate by the Secretary. These changes collectively aim to strengthen rural health capacity, improve quality, and expand access through more flexible, community-tailored care models.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates 5-year Rural Health Transformation Grants for State Offices of Rural Health and eligible providers to support new rural care models.
The Secretary may awarding grants to support carrying out other grants via technical assistance, data analysis, and evaluation.
State Offices of Rural Health are given enhanced roles and new authorities to distribute funds under the program.
New Rural Emergency Hospital Technical Assistance grants help facilities pursue designation and receive related support.
Funds can be used for software/hardware, staff training, and other reform activities to modernize rural health delivery.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Amendments to 1820(g): core grant mechanisms
Section 2 modifies the Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility program by updating the core grant framework. It expands the list of supported entities to include critical access hospitals, certified rural health clinics, and rural emergency hospitals for purposes of quality improvement, reporting, performance improvements, benchmarking, population health, and behavioral health/linkages. The changes recast several subsections to accommodate the new grant authorities and to align funding with the evolving rural health landscape.
Reorganization of subsections (3)-(7)
The bill redesignates existing subsections, creating a clearer framework for future grant authorities. This reorganization preserves substantive content while adjusting numbering to reflect new grant programs and enabling the Secretary to operationalize the expanded suite of grants, including those that support carrying out other grants.
New paragraph (3): activities to support other grants
New paragraph (3) authorizes the Secretary to award grants or cooperative agreements to entities that have already received grants under this sub-section to support activities like technical assistance, data analysis, and evaluation. This creates an integrated support ecology so grantees can implement, measure, and scale reform efforts.
State Office of Rural Health emphasis; definitions
The subsection redesigns the use and designation of grants to State Offices of Rural Health (instead of hospitals in some cases) and expands the definition of eligible rural health care providers to include rural health clinics, CAHs, and other rural entities. It also clarifies the application process and the use of funds remains tied to delivering reform and capacity-building support at the local level.
Rural Health Transformation and Emergency Assistance (new paras. 9-10)
New paragraphs establish Rural Health Transformation Grants (5-year terms) to fund transitions to modern rural care models and define eligible providers. They also create Rural Emergency Hospital Technical Assistance (Section 10) to support facilities pursuing or maintaining rural emergency hospital designation. Together, these provisions formalize a pipeline for model transformation and ongoing technical support.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- State Offices of Rural Health gain structured funding and a central coordinating role in rural reform.
- Critical Access Hospitals and other eligible rural hospitals gain access to transformation grants and technical assistance to modernize operations.
- Certified Rural Health Clinics and rural health providers benefit from funding for IT upgrades, training, and better care models.
- Rural health networks and coalitions receive support to align local efforts with state and federal objectives.
- Rural communities benefit from improved access, care quality, and integrated behavioral health and telehealth services.
Who Bears the Cost
- The federal government (DOHHS) must fund and administer these expanded grants.
- State governments bear administrative responsibilities and reporting burdens for program management.
- Eligible rural providers may incur upfront or ongoing costs to implement reform activities not fully covered by grant funds, subject to grant terms.
- Potential administrative and compliance costs for State Offices of Rural Health as they scale up coordination and evaluation activities.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing rapid, model-wide rural health transformation with the realities of finite federal funding and diverse state contexts—while ensuring that reforms are sustainable, inclusive, and genuinely aligned with community needs.
The bill’s expansion of grant authorities is designed to accelerate rural health transformation, but it introduces broader coordination, reporting, and sustainability considerations. The reliance on local letters of support and cross-payer backing aims to anchor reform in community buy-in, yet it creates potential coordination challenges among state agencies, providers, and payers.
The inclusion of multiple new grant programs also raises questions about the sequencing of awards, the adequacy of initial funding, and the path to long-term viability beyond grant dollars.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.