This bill authorizes a temporary, targeted increase in federal financing to support state Medicaid home and community‑based services (HCBS). It conditions additional federal funds on a state application and specifies allowable uses focused on workforce compensation, service access, emergency preparedness, and supports that enable people to remain in or return to community settings.
The measure aims to move federal dollars quickly into HCBS delivery while attaching guardrails: states must submit applications describing planned activities, provide assurances about how funds will be used and overseen, and report outcomes. The package is designed to expand capacity and improve job stability for home health workers and direct support professionals, with an explicit emphasis on using increased payments to raise worker compensation and recruit and retain staff.
At a Glance
What It Does
Conditions a temporary increase in federal Medicaid matching for states that apply and commit to using funds to strengthen HCBS delivery, workforce pay, and access. The Secretary certifies applications and states implement a menu of permitted activities developed with community partners.
Who It Affects
State Medicaid programs and their HCBS delivery systems, including home health agencies, direct support professionals, area agencies on aging, PACE providers, and beneficiaries eligible for Medicaid HCBS (including individuals on waiver waiting lists). The Department of Health and Human Services administers approvals, oversight, and an external evaluation.
Why It Matters
This creates a time‑limited infusion of federal resources aimed at addressing persistent HCBS workforce shortages and long wait lists while testing practices states use to convert short‑term money into sustained access. The combination of allowable uses and reporting requirements will generate evidence about what state strategies produce measurable improvements.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill sets a conditional funding program that funnels extra federal Medicaid dollars to states willing to commit to a set of HCBS improvements developed with community partners (Area Agencies on Aging, Centers for Independent Living, non‑profit providers, etc.). States must submit an application describing which of the enumerated activities they will pursue and how they will implement them; the Secretary reviews applications for completeness and the bill provides a streamlined approval mechanism once an application is certified complete.
The statute lists a broad menu of permissible activities: increasing reimbursement rates, providing paid leave and hazard pay, stabilizing hours and scheduling, buying emergency supplies (including PPE), covering travel for in‑home visits, recruiting and training staff, supporting family caregivers (including caregiver pay and respite), buying assistive technologies, and enabling day services providers to deliver HCBS. It also explicitly authorizes one‑time supports to move people back from institutional settings—including moving costs and initial rent—and to resume HCBS for people who were on waiver waiting lists during a defined emergency period.States must include assurances in their applications about oversight, data validity, and that federal funds will supplement, not supplant, existing state HCBS spending.
The statute imposes state reporting and requires the Department of Health and Human Services to commission an external evaluation that documents changes in access, availability, and quality across participating states and to publish those findings to federal oversight committees and the public in accessible formats.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The FMAP increase is capped so no state’s matched rate can exceed 95 percent after the 10 percentage‑point boost is applied.
When a state submits its application the Secretary has a 90‑day window to certify completeness; once certified the application is treated as approved for purposes of receiving the increased match.
The bill requires that any agency or individual receiving payment under an increased rate must increase the compensation paid to home health workers or direct support professionals.
Funds may be used for one‑time relocation and start‑up costs to help people move back from nursing facilities or institutions into community settings, including moving costs and first month’s rent.
Participating states must file a report by December 31, 2029, and HHS must hire an external evaluator to aggregate outcomes, publish findings publicly, and transmit results to specified congressional committees.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Temporary FMAP increase for HCBS spending
This subsection defines the financing mechanism: for states that participate, the federal medical assistance percentage used to reimburse eligible HCBS expenditures is increased by 10 percentage points for services provided during fiscal years 2026 and 2027. The provision cross‑references existing FMAP rules in section 1905(b) and related subsections and imposes an absolute cap—no state's FMAP may exceed 95 percent after the adjustment. Practically, the clause targets a short window of higher federal share to be claimed against specific HCBS expenditures only.
Application requirement and assurances
A state must submit an application in the form and timeline set by the Secretary describing which allowable activities it will implement and how. The application must include assurances that federal funds will be spent for the listed HCBS activities, will supplement not supplant state spending, will be expended within the statutorily specified period, and that the state will ensure oversight and data validity. These assurances create compliance hooks for later audits or federal review.
Certification and deemed approval process
The Secretary must certify whether an application is complete within 90 days of submission; once certified as complete the application is deemed approved under the statute. That shifts the approval model toward procedural completeness rather than substantive conditionality and creates predictable timing for states, but limits the Secretary’s ability to delay or negotiate substantive changes once the application is certified.
Enumerated permissible activities to strengthen HCBS
This long subsection lists concrete, allowable uses of funds developed in coordination with community partners: rate increases tied to worker compensation, paid leave, hazard/shift/overtime pay, scheduling stability, purchasing PPE and emergency supplies, travel reimbursement, recruitment, family caregiver supports, training, assistive technologies, accessible public health materials, interpreter services, allowing day services to provide in‑home care, retainer payments, and expenses tied to the HCBS settings rule. The breadth gives states flexibility to invest in workforce and service continuity, but several items (like retainer payments and one‑time start‑up costs) blur lines between operating and capital or transitional expenditures.
Reporting, external evaluation, and dissemination
Participating states must submit a final report on funded activities, service counts, and outcomes. HHS is required to retain an external evaluator with HCBS and aging experience to measure changes in access, availability, and quality across states, to identify promising practices, and to publish and transmit results to specific congressional committees. The provision explicitly exempts these reports from the Paperwork Reduction Act, expediting data collection but also bypassing a common public comment and burden‑assessment process.
Definitions and scope
This section clarifies key terms: 'eligible individual' (a person enrolled in Medicaid), 'Medicaid program' (title XIX programs and related waivers/demonstrations), 'Secretary' (HHS), and 'State' (title XIX definition). It also defines 'home and community‑based services' through a list of statutory authorizations and a residual catchall granting the Secretary discretion to specify additional services, which can expand the program's reach depending on future agency guidance.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Medicaid beneficiaries seeking HCBS, including people on waiver waiting lists: the law authorizes funds to expand slots, resume services for people who lost them, and finance moving and start‑up costs to return from institutions to the community.
- Home health agencies and direct support professionals: reimbursement increases and allowed uses tied to compensation, paid leave, and hazard/shift pay are designed to raise wages, stabilize hours, and improve retention.
- Family caregivers: the statute explicitly permits caregiver pay and respite services, offering states a vehicle to support unpaid family members who provide long‑term care.
- Area Agencies on Aging, Centers for Independent Living, and community providers: the bill requires states to work with these partners on implementation, potentially directing funding to organizations that coordinate local services.
- States (short‑term fiscal relief): participating states receive a higher federal match for qualifying HCBS expenditures during the covered fiscal years, reducing near‑term state budget pressure for these services.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal budget (Treasury): the enhanced FMAP increases federal outlays for Medicaid HCBS during the covered period.
- State Medicaid agencies: states must prepare applications, ensure oversight, document compliance with 'supplement not supplant' rules, and produce reports, all of which create administrative workload and potential fiscal choices about sustaining gains after federal funds end.
- HHS/CMS: the department must process applications within a fixed timeframe, certify completeness, oversee spending across multiple waiver and demonstration authorities, and manage an external evaluation—responsibilities that consume agency capacity and resources.
- Nursing facilities and institutional providers: if states finance moves back to community settings, institutional census and revenues could decline; facilities will face operational and market adjustments.
- Small HCBS providers with limited administrative capacity: meeting increased documentation, pay‑pass‑through requirements, or qualifying for retainer payments may strain smaller organizations, potentially reshaping provider markets.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma: deliver a fast, flexible federal funding infusion that meaningfully improves HCBS access and worker pay versus ensuring those dollars produce durable outcomes and are not used to replace existing state funding or fund transient fixes—an urgency that favors speed conflicts with accountability that requires time and precise metrics.
The bill pushes substantial, short‑term federal resources into a complex, decentralized set of services but leaves significant implementation detail to states and the Secretary. The 10 percentage‑point boost is time‑limited and subject to a 95 percent cap, which means states with already high FMAPs will get different marginal benefit than lower‑match states.
The statute requires states to assure that rate increases translate into higher worker compensation, but it does not specify precise tracking metrics, wage floors, or enforcement remedies if pass‑through assurances are not met.
Administrative mechanics raise practical questions. The 'deemed approved' model after a 90‑day completeness certification speeds uptake but limits HHS’s ability to negotiate substantive program design changes.
The carve‑out from the Paperwork Reduction Act accelerates data collection but reduces procedural safeguards around burden estimates and public input. The bill allows a wide array of permissible uses—from recurring wage increases to one‑time moving costs and retainer payments—creating a tension between short‑term crisis response and investments that produce durable workforce improvements.
Finally, the broad residual authority allowing the Secretary to specify 'other services' could expand eligible expenditures in ways that shift the program’s focus unless tightly interpreted.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.