Codify — Article

Employer-Directed Skills Act creates employer-led training accounts

Establishes employer-directed skills accounts to finance on-the-job training and employer-sponsored development via local workforce boards.

The Brief

HB4049 amends the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to create employer-directed skills accounts (EDSAs) that fund and reimburse employer-led training. The bill defines employer-sponsored skills development, expands on-the-job training, and requires local workforce boards to arrange payments through ED­SAs for eligible programs.

It also adds oversight provisions, aligns training with in-demand sectors, and requires employers to commit to employing participants after program completion. The framework positions employers as the primary decision-makers for who gets trained, how training is delivered, and when reimbursement occurs, with the federal contribution delivered through the employer-directed skills account.

At a Glance

What It Does

Creates employer-directed skills accounts to reimburse employers for on-the-job training or employer-sponsored skills development, funded via local workforce boards and conditioned on employer commitments to hire.

Who It Affects

Employers (varying sizes) that sponsor training, individuals selected by employers for training (not necessarily employees), local workforce boards and one-stop operators, and training providers.

Why It Matters

Shifts cost-sharing and decision rights to employers, potentially speeding job-relevant training and credential attainment, while embedding accountability through signed agreements and wage documentation.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill introduces a new funding and delivery mechanism called employer-directed skills accounts (EDSAs) under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act. These accounts support two paths: on-the-job training (OJT) and employer-sponsored skills development.

In both cases, an employer selects a participant (a non-employee may be chosen for OJT or skills development) and signs an agreement with the participant and the local board or training provider. The employer contributes a non-Federal share of costs (minimum thresholds based on employer size: 10% for up to 50 employees, 25% for 51–100, and 50% for more than 100 employees), while the federal share is delivered via the ED­­SA to cover the remaining costs.

The local board reviews and approves the employer’s agreements, ensures wage documentation is collected, and reimburses the employer for the Federal share after the participant earns wages during OJT or for employer-sponsored services. The bill also expands WIOA’s information provisions to include employers offering such programs and the credentialing outcomes associated with them, and it prioritizes small businesses when evaluating agreements.

Under the ED­­SA framework, local plans must accommodate these accounts alongside existing individual training accounts, and programs must meet conditions that reflect both credential attainment and alignment with local workforce investment needs. The act also requires the local boards to provide coordination and information about participating employers and approved programs, helping job-seekers and employers navigate the new option without sacrificing accountability or performance tracking.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The bill creates employer-directed skills accounts (EDSAs) to fund employer-led training.

2

Employers must provide a non-Federal cost share: 10% (≤50 employees), 25% (51–100), or 50% (>100).

3

Participants are selected by employers for OJT or employer-sponsored development under signed agreements.

4

Local boards pay for the Federal share through ED­­SAs and require wage documentation for reimbursement.

5

The bill expands local plans and information requirements to include ED­­SAs and credential outcomes, with priority for small businesses in approvals.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 3(19)

Employer-sponsored skills development—definition

The bill adds a new definition of employer-sponsored skills development to Section 3 of WIOA. It describes a program chosen by an employer to meet specific skill needs, run under an employer-sponsored agreement, with an employer commitment to hire upon completion. The employer must contribute a minimum share of the cost (10% for small employers, 25% for mid-size, 50% for large employers) and the Federal share is delivered through an employer-directed skills account. This creates a formal mechanism for employer-led training within the public workforce system.

Section 3(45)

On-the-job training expansion

The bill expands the OJT framework to allow the Federal share of training costs to be paid through an employer-directed skills account when the conditions of ED­­SA eligibility are met. This ensures that on-the-job training can be supported with public funds routed specifically for employer-directed programs, reinforcing the employer’s role in selecting participants and structuring training agreements.

Related conforming amendments

Cross-references to reflect ED­­SA changes

The bill makes a set of conforming amendments to various sections of WIOA to update cross-references from 3(44)/3(45) to the new 3(45) and related subsections. It also broadens transitional employment references to include employer-sponsored skills development, and it inserts the concept of employer-directed skills development in other sections to maintain consistency across the statute.

5 more sections
Section 122(h) amendments

Exceptions for ED­­SA‑supported training

Paragraphs in Section 122(h) are amended to explicitly include “employer-sponsored skills development” among the training categories alongside incumbent worker training. These changes create parallel eligibility for ED­­SA-supported activities within the broader framework of training services funded under WIOA.

Section 134(c)(2)(A) Career Services

Career services expanded for ED­­SAs

The bill amends career services to add information on employers offering ED­­SA-based training and the performance information for those programs. It also requires coordination with employers to help establish ED­­SA agreements and on-the-job training arrangements, ensuring that local workforce boards can guide participants to reputable ED­­SA opportunities.

Section 134(c)(3) Eligibility

Eligibility and ED­­SA program requirements

ED­­SA eligibility is defined by adding conditions for participant selection by an employer and the establishment of OJT or skills development agreements. It introduces a streamlined process for accepting participants selected by employers and describes the documentation and approval flow to ensure that the ED­­SA is properly set up, funded, and administered by the local board.

Section 134(c)(3)(I) Establishment of ED­­SAs

Establishment, conditions, and payments

This is the core provision creating ED­­SAs. It specifies that an employer can select an individual for OJT or employer-sponsored development, with a signed agreement covering wage data, training duration, skills learned, and a commitment to employment. The local board approves and manages the ED­­SA, enabling payments to the employer for the Federal share and requiring documentation of wages for reimbursement. It also sets forth the structure of the agreements (OJT vs. employer-sponsored development) and the information that must be provided to justify reimbursement.

Section 108(b)(19) Local Plan

Local plan addendum for ED­­SA

The local plan is updated to include ED­­SA provisions as part of the broader individual training accounts. This ensures ED­­SA activities are integrated into local workforce strategies and funding decisions, aligning with local needs and investment priorities.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Employment across all five countries.

Explore Employment in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Job seekers who are selected by employers for OJT or skills development and gain work-based training with credential opportunities.
  • Small businesses with limited training budgets, who gain access to federal support for employee development and a streamlined path to credential attainment.
  • Local workforce boards and one-stop operators, which coordinate and authorize ED­­SA payments and employer agreements, improving local market intelligence.
  • Training providers and credentialing bodies that offer recognized credentials within ED­­SA programs, expanding market opportunities and measurement across programs.
  • Industries identified as in-demand in local plans, which gain a structured pipeline of trained workers aligned to sector needs.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Employers’ non-Federal cost share (minimums of 10%/25%/50% depending on firm size) for training programs.
  • Local boards’ administrative and operational costs to process ED­­SA agreements, track wages, and manage reimbursements.
  • Employers may incur costs related to program design, performance reporting, and ongoing certification requirements for the training programs they sponsor.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central tension is whether shifting funding and decision rights to employers will improve alignment with labor market needs while preserving access, equity, and learner protections within a public workforce system.

The Employer-Directed Skills Act introduces a significant shift in how workforce training is financed and aligned with employer needs. By funneling public funds through employer-directed skills accounts, the bill intensifies employer control over training design, participant selection, and the use of reimbursement funds.

That control comes with explicit cost-sharing requirements for employers and increased accountability measures for local boards, including wage documentation and performance reporting. A key question is how this model will balance speed and responsiveness to labor market needs with access and equity for job seekers who may rely on public training options.

The interplay with existing WIOA programs will also require careful implementation to avoid program fragmentation and to ensure consistent credential outcomes across ED­­SA paths.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.