The FAIR PREP Act adds a new subsection to Internal Revenue Code section 6020 that forbids the Secretary of the Treasury from preparing tax returns or refund claims, and explicitly treats returns prepared through any electronic tax-preparation service operated by the IRS as returns prepared by the Secretary. The bill preserves existing statutory exceptions and the IRS Free File arrangement, but it also bars the Treasury from awarding grants, contracts, or reimbursable agreements to develop or operate an IRS electronic tax-preparation option unless another law permits it.
The amendment applies to returns filed after 30 days from enactment.
This is consequential for tax administration and private-sector tax-prep firms. The bill would shut down — or foreclose future creation of — an IRS-operated direct-file or comparable e‑prep system by statutory prohibition and by cutting off related procurement and funding authority.
It preserves legacy volunteer and private‑sector delivery channels while making the legal standard for what counts as government “preparation” explicit, creating both a compliance obligation for the IRS and litigation risk around what counts as an IRS-operated service or a comparable program.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill amends IRC §6020 to prohibit the Secretary from preparing returns or refund claims and treats use of any IRS-operated electronic tax-preparation service as preparation by the Secretary. It carves out qualified return-prep programs and the IRS Free File Program and defines key terms (including that 'prepare' covers completion and filing).
Who It Affects
The IRS/Treasury (limiting its ability to offer direct e‑file or direct tax-prep services), commercial tax-preparation and software firms, Free File partners, contractors and grantees developing e‑prep systems, and taxpayers who might have used a government-run direct-file option.
Why It Matters
It converts a policy debate about IRS innovation into statutory prohibition and a procurement restriction, shifting where and how simple, no‑cost filing options can be offered and triggering implementation questions about what counts as an IRS ‘operated’ or ‘comparable’ service.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
At its core, the FAIR PREP Act writes into the Internal Revenue Code a clear prohibition: the Treasury Secretary may not prepare tax returns or refund claims, except where other explicit statutory provisions already allow (the bill references section 6014 and the existing paragraphs (a) and (b) of section 6020). The bill goes further by saying that any return prepared through an electronic tax-preparation service that the Secretary operates will be treated as if the Secretary prepared the return — which operationally forbids IRS-operated online tax-prep systems even if those systems merely let taxpayers assemble and file their own returns.
The statute defines 'prepare' broadly to include completing the forms and schedules needed to compute and report tax and the act of filing the return or refund claim. The bill expressly treats partial assistance — for example, preparing a portion of a return — as the same as preparing the whole return.
But it narrows the reach a bit: routine computations or corrections authorized under existing code provisions, and provision of fillable forms that merely include automated calculation features, are excluded from the definition of preparation.Two important exceptions remain. First, the bill excludes 'qualified return preparation programs' (a statutory term cross‑referenced to section 7526A(e)), preserving certain authorized programs.
Second, it preserves the IRS Free File Program as established by the Federal Register notices referenced in the text (and subsequent agreements and rules tied to that program). The bill anchors the phrase 'electronic tax preparation service operated by the Secretary' to the free direct e-file tax return system described in Federal Register notices from December 2023 and September 2024, and to any successor IRS program.Finally, the FAIR PREP Act blocks the Treasury from awarding grants, contracts, payments, or reimbursable agreements to develop or operate an electronic tax-preparation service after enactment, unless another law expressly authorizes that spending.
The amendment takes effect for returns filed more than 30 days after enactment, and the bill includes a non-inference clause saying it does not change the legal authority or create inferences about the Secretary's conduct with respect to tax years beginning on or before the enactment date.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill inserts new subsection (c) into IRC §6020 making it unlawful for the Secretary to prepare any tax return or claim for refund except where another statutory provision already authorizes preparation.
It treats any return or refund claim prepared through an IRS-operated electronic tax-preparation service (e.g.
a direct-file system) as preparation by the Secretary, effectively banning IRS-run e‑prep platforms.
The statute expressly preserves qualified return-preparation programs (sec. 7526A(e)) and the IRS Free File Program as published in the Federal Register (Nov. 4, 2002) — those channels remain available.
‘Prepare’ is defined to include completing required forms and schedules and filing the return; the bill treats preparation of any portion of a return as preparation of the whole, while excluding routine math/clerical corrections and simple fillable forms with calculations.
Section 3 prohibits the Treasury from awarding grants, contracts, payments, or reimbursable agreements to develop or operate an IRS electronic tax-preparation service after enactment unless another law authorizes such expenditures.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Provides the act’s name: the 'Fostering Autonomy in Independent Returns by Prohibiting Redundant and Extralegal Programs Act of 2025' or 'FAIR PREP Act of 2025.' This is a formal label with no substantive effect on interpretation but signals congressional intent to restrict IRS involvement in direct-prep services.
General prohibition on Treasury preparing returns
Adds a new subsection that bars the Secretary from preparing any return or claim for refund except as already allowed elsewhere in the Code. Mechanically, this creates a statutory duty not to engage in return preparation and sets a clear legal standard the IRS must follow when designing taxpayer-facing services. It removes ambiguity about whether the IRS may host or operate a turnkey online tax‑preparation and filing tool.
Direct-file and comparable IRS-operated programs treated as preparation
Specifies that any return completed via an electronic tax-preparation service operated by the Secretary is to be treated as having been prepared by the Secretary. Practically, this captures not only IRS-built full-service preparers but also any direct-file model where the IRS supplies an online interface that assembles and files returns for taxpayers.
Carveouts for qualified programs and Free File
The provision excludes certain preexisting delivery channels from the prohibition: (A) 'qualified return preparation programs' as defined under section 7526A(e) and (B) the IRS Free File Program as established in the Federal Register (Nov. 4, 2002) and subsequent related agreements and rules. Those carveouts preserve existing volunteer and private-sector partnership arrangements while blocking new IRS-operated preparation services outside those frameworks.
Definition of 'prepare' and 'electronic tax preparation service operated by the Secretary'
Defines 'prepare' to include completing necessary forms/schedules and filing, and it treats partial completion as full preparation for statutory purposes. It excludes math/clerk corrections and authorized computations, and it says fillable forms with automated calculations are not per se 'preparation.' It also ties the phrase 'electronic tax preparation service operated by the Secretary' to the free direct e-file system described in Dec. 2023 and Sept. 2024 Federal Register notices, plus any successor program — a drafting choice that anchors the statute to specific administrative efforts and their successors.
Timing and preserved past authority
The amendment applies to returns filed more than 30 days after enactment, so it has near-term effect for upcoming filing seasons. The bill also contains a non-inference clause clarifying it does not retroactively change or create inferences about authority the Secretary exercised for tax years beginning on or before the enactment date; that language is meant to limit legal disputes about past IRS activities but does not expand future authority.
Limit on grants, contracts, and reimbursable agreements
Prohibits the Secretary from awarding grants, contracts, payments, or entering reimbursable agreements to develop or operate an electronic tax-preparation service option after enactment unless some other law authorizes the spending. This is a procurement-and-budgetary block that complements the substantive prohibition by closing common administrative routes (grants, contractor builds, interagency reimbursables) through which the IRS might otherwise create a direct-file capability.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Commercial tax-preparation firms and tax software vendors — The statutory bar reduces potential government competition in online tax preparation that could displace paid products and services.
- Paid preparers (CPAs, enrolled agents, and tax preparer businesses) — By treating IRS-operated e‑prep as prohibited preparation, the bill reduces a pathway for taxpayers to shift from paid preparers to a government-hosted alternative.
- Free File partners and existing qualified program operators — The bill explicitly preserves these channels, protecting their operational role and contractual relationships with the IRS.
Who Bears the Cost
- Internal Revenue Service/Treasury — The agency loses an administrative option to offer a government-run, no-cost online preparation service and may face limitations on modernizing taxpayer-facing systems through contractors or grants.
- Low‑income or low‑complexity taxpayers who would have used an IRS direct-file option — Those taxpayers may lose access to a potentially simpler, government‑provided filing route and will continue to rely on private or volunteer services.
- IT contractors and vendors currently developing IRS direct-file prototypes — The procurement restriction curtails future contracting opportunities to build IRS-run e‑prep systems unless Congress expressly authorizes them.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between preventing government competition with private-sector tax-prep providers and enabling a public-sector option to simplify filing and reduce costs for taxpayers: the bill decisively favors shielding private markets and partnership models over creating or maintaining an IRS-operated direct-prep service, but in doing so it sacrifices a straightforward public mechanism that proponents say could lower filing costs and improve compliance.
The act solves a single problem — preventing the IRS from operating a direct-file or comparable e‑prep system — by drafting a broad prohibition and coupling it with procurement limits. That approach raises several implementation questions.
The statute anchors key terms to specific Federal Register notices and to cross-referenced statutory definitions, but litigation or administrative disputes can still arise over what counts as an IRS 'operated' service or a 'comparable' program. For example, an IRS portal that brokers private software offers, hosts a third‑party interface, or embeds private‑sector code could be challenged as an impermissible government preparation service, depending on operational control and contractual structures.
The procurement bar in Section 3 is significant because agencies commonly rely on interagency agreements, grants, or vendor contracts to prototype large IT projects. The clause 'unless otherwise authorized by law' leaves a path open for Congress to approve specific funding or for later statutes to reauthorize such efforts, but until that happens IRS program managers will face constrained options for funding development.
Finally, preserving Free File and qualified programs avoids immediate disruption to existing partnerships but also perpetuates the policy status quo critics point to — a private-sector-facilitated Free File model that many stakeholders regard as underutilized. That preservation may frustrate advocates who argue a government-run direct-file model would better serve low-cost filing and compliance goals.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.