Codify — Article

Direct File Act of 2026 codifies a free federal online tax‑filing program

Creates a government-owned IRS online preparation and filing system, bans agreements that limit IRS service provision, and adds filing‑deadline and state integration rules.

The Brief

The Direct File Act of 2026 amends the Internal Revenue Code to make the IRS’s Direct File program statutory: the IRS must operate a government-owned online tax preparation and filing service, promote it, provide customer support, and ensure accessibility. The bill also bans any agreements that would prevent the Secretary of the Treasury from offering such preparation or filing services and voids existing restrictive agreements within 30 days of enactment.

This matters to tax compliance officers, state tax agencies, and private tax‑preparation firms. It shifts the government from providing support tools to operating a full-service, no‑fee filing product, requires coordination with states for integrated state filing, changes deadlines for certain information returns, and authorizes funding for implementation through 2035.

The change raises operational, privacy, and competitive questions for stakeholders who run, regulate, or rely on the tax‑preparation marketplace.

At a Glance

What It Does

The bill adds section 7531 to the Internal Revenue Code, requiring the Secretary to establish a federally owned online tax preparation and filing program that imports IRS data, uses interview‑style forms, offers multi‑language and accessible interfaces, provides live customer support, and cannot charge users. It also prohibits the Secretary from entering into agreements that restrict the IRS from providing such services and voids past restrictive agreements after 30 days.

Who It Affects

Directly affects the IRS (as operator), taxpayers eligible to use Direct File (targeted expansion to cover at least 50% of taxpayers in participating states by taxable years after 2027), participating state tax agencies that opt into integrated filing, and private tax‑preparation firms currently selling paid software and services.

Why It Matters

This converts Direct File from a program to a legal obligation with funding authorization, creates a federal entrant in the retail tax‑preparation market, and builds a formal mechanism for state–federal integration—changing incentives for states and vendors and creating new operational responsibilities for the IRS.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill requires the IRS to operate a government‑owned online tax preparation and filing system for individual income taxes. The system must simplify returns by importing IRS data (when taxpayers opt in), present questions via an interview interface, support multiple languages and mobile access, meet federal accessibility standards, provide live integrated customer support like chat, and let taxpayers file even if they are not required to file.

The statute directs visible placement on the IRS website and an explicit mass marketing campaign to reach likely users.

The law sets an explicit eligibility goal: for taxable years beginning after 2027, at least 50% of taxpayers residing in 'participating States' should be eligible to use Direct File, and the IRS must expand eligibility as much as possible. A participating State either integrates its state tax filing with Direct File or has no state income tax; the statute authorizes a grant of $1,000,000 to a participating State that demonstrates its system meets standards similar to the federal program.

The Secretary also must report annually to Congress beginning August 31, 2027 on use levels, satisfaction, barriers to use, and improvement plans.In addition to establishing Direct File, the bill bars the Secretary from entering into agreements that restrict the IRS’s legal right to provide tax preparation or filing services and voids any such prior agreements 30 days after enactment. The statute makes taxpayer accuracy and responsibility clear: using Direct File does not relieve taxpayers of their duty to file accurate returns.

It explicitly prohibits charging taxpayers fees to use the program and adds a technical change to the Internal Revenue Code setting March 31 of the year after the calendar year as the deadline for electronically filed information returns that previously lacked a deadline. The measure authorizes whatever sums are necessary to implement the changes from fiscal years 2026 through 2035 and applies to returns for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

Section 2 forbids the Secretary from entering into agreements that limit the IRS’s ability to provide preparation or filing services and voids any such existing agreements 30 days after enactment.

2

Section 7531 requires the Direct File program be owned by the Federal Government, import IRS data into returns at taxpayer election, use interview‑based filing, support multiple languages, meet accessibility standards, and offer integrated live customer support.

3

For taxable years beginning after 2027, the bill requires that at least 50% of taxpayers residing in 'participating States' be eligible to use Direct File, with the Secretary directed to expand eligibility further at their discretion.

4

The statute prohibits charging any fee to taxpayers for using Direct File and imposes a statutory duty on the Secretary to promote the service via a comprehensive mass marketing campaign.

5

The bill amends section 6071 to establish that electronically filed information returns without other deadlines must be filed by March 31 of the year following the related calendar year.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 2 (Prohibition on Agreements)

Bans agreements that restrict IRS from providing preparation or filing services

This section prevents the Secretary from entering into future contracts that would limit the IRS’s legal authority to operate tax preparation or filing software or services, or that condition payments on the Secretary abstaining from providing those services. It voids any such agreements entered into on or before enactment 30 days after the law takes effect. Practically, agencies will need to inventory contracts and transition away from any clauses that cede market space to private vendors.

Section 3(a) — New Section 7531(a)

Establishes and requires operation of a federal online tax preparation and filing program

Adds a statutory mandate that the IRS 'establish and operate' an online program enabling taxpayers to prepare and file individual income tax returns. Making the program mandatory (not discretionary) changes the IRS’s baseline obligations, requiring organizational planning, staffing, procurement, and long‑term operational budgeting rather than pilot‑level activity.

Section 3(b)(1) — Program Requirements

Design, accessibility, promotion, and customer support requirements

Specifies detailed product features: government ownership; data import from IRS records at taxpayer election; interview‑style workflow; plain language and multi‑language support; mobile accessibility; compliance with section 508 accessibility standards; prominent placement on the IRS website; a mass marketing campaign; targeted promotion to likely users; integrated live customer support; and the ability to file regardless of filing obligation. These requirements force the IRS to build a consumer‑grade product and to run marketing and support operations similar to private vendors.

5 more sections
Section 3(b)(2) — Eligibility and Participating States

Eligibility goal of at least 50% for taxpayers in participating States and state participation rules

Defines 'participating State' as one that integrates state filing with the federal program or has no state income tax. It sets a not‑less‑than‑50% eligibility target for taxpayers in participating States for taxable years after 2027, while giving the Secretary discretion to determine eligibility cohorts. This creates a phased expansion approach tied to state cooperation and internal agency prioritization decisions.

Section 3(b)(3) and (c)–(e) — Reporting, Liability, and Fees

Annual reporting, taxpayer responsibility, and fee prohibition

Requires an annual report to Congress on usage, satisfaction, and barriers beginning August 31, 2027. The law clarifies that taxpayer responsibility for accuracy remains unchanged and expressly bans charging taxpayers any fee to use Direct File. Together, these provisions set transparency obligations and consumer protection guardrails while maintaining existing taxpayer legal duties.

Section 3(e) and (d) — State Integration Grants and Funding

State filing integration and a $1M grant eligibility standard; authorization of appropriations

Directs the IRS to enable seamless federal–state filing for participating States by sharing return data (subject to section 6103 protections) and establishes a grant program offering $1,000,000 to a participating State that demonstrates its filing functionality meets standards similar to the federal program. The bill also authorizes 'such sums as may be necessary' to implement the statutory changes for FY2026–2035, signaling multi‑year resource commitments but leaving exact funding levels to appropriations.

Amendment to Section 6071

Sets a March 31 deadline for electronically filed information returns lacking other deadlines

Revises the filing deadline rules for information returns: written‑statement‑paired returns must be filed by the date the statement is furnished, and electronically filed information returns without other deadlines must be filed by March 31 of the year following the calendar year. This is a technical but operationally significant change for payers and their IT systems, shifting timing for some electronic filings and matching the practical rhythm of electronic data flows.

Effective Date

Applicability to taxable years after December 31, 2025

States the program and filing‑deadline changes apply to returns for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, which creates an existing‑law lookback for eligibility and implementation planning and requires the IRS to phase operational readiness against that effective date.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.

Explore Finance in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Low‑complexity taxpayers and filers who pay for commercial software: They receive a free government option that imports IRS data, simplifies entry via an interview flow, and offers live support and multi‑language interfaces, lowering costs and friction.
  • Participating state tax agencies that integrate with Direct File: States that opt to connect can offer seamless filing to residents and may receive grant funding to upgrade systems, reducing taxpayer confusion and potentially increasing filing compliance.
  • Taxpayers with accessibility needs and non‑English speakers: The statutory requirement to meet section 508 accessibility standards and provide multiple languages improves access for taxpayers who previously faced barriers using private software.
  • Tax policy and compliance analysts: The mandated annual reporting on use, satisfaction, and barriers creates a new data stream for evaluating filing behavior and program performance.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Private tax‑preparation companies and commercial software vendors: A government‑owned, free filing product increases competitive pressure on paid products and services, particularly for simple returns and low‑income segments.
  • IRS operational budget and program managers: The IRS must staff, market, secure, maintain, and support a consumer‑grade filing product and integrate with states—tasks that carry sustained IT, cybersecurity, customer support, and outreach costs that Congress must appropriate.
  • State tax agencies choosing to integrate: States must meet standards similar to the federal program and may need to invest in interoperable systems and data‑sharing processes; grants are available but may not cover full modernization costs.
  • Third‑party integrators and legacy contract partners: Vendors whose contracts include clauses now voided or who currently supply 'preparation' functions to the IRS may face contract renegotiation, termination, or lost revenue.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central tension is between expanding equitable, low‑cost access to tax filing (through a free, government‑owned Direct File) and the operational, privacy, and market consequences of the government running a consumer tax‑preparation product: ensuring accessibility and consumer protection pushes the IRS to deliver a robust service, but doing so requires sustained funding, new technical capabilities, careful data‑sharing safeguards, and will disrupt a large private market—trade‑offs with no simple technical fix.

The bill leaves several operationally important details unspecified. It instructs the Secretary to make at least 50% of taxpayers in participating States 'eligible' by taxable years after 2027, but it gives broad secretarial discretion to define eligibility cohorts; implementation choices—income caps, return complexity filters, or phased rollouts—will determine how many real filers can use Direct File and when.

The statute requires data sharing with states 'subject to section 6103' but does not detail the privacy, minimization, or retention standards for cross‑jurisdictional exchanges; states and the IRS will need detailed agreements to protect taxpayer confidentiality while enabling seamless filing.

Funding is authorized 'as may be necessary' through 2035 but the bill does not set appropriation amounts or milestones tied to performance. That gap risks under‑resourcing core functions—security, customer support, and outreach—if appropriations lag expectations.

The prohibition on fees and voiding of existing restrictive agreements protects a free public option but raises legal and transition costs: terminating or rewiring prior contracts and managing vendor relationships could trigger disputes, conversion costs, or litigation. Finally, the law mandates consumer‑grade features (marketing, live chat, multi‑language support) that extend the IRS’s mission into areas where it has limited prior operational experience, creating risks around quality of service, cybersecurity, and potential mission creep into competitive marketplaces.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.