This bill amends the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to treat spotted lanternfly control research and development as a high-priority research and extension initiative. It also adds a grants-based mechanism to develop and disseminate research-based tools and treatments for combating the Spotted Lanternfly (Lycorma delicatula).
In addition, the measure reauthorizes the high-priority research and extension initiatives by moving expiration dates from 2023 to 2030 across several subsections of the Act. The combination signals a policy priority: accelerate R&D and ensure ongoing support for practical pest-management tools in the field.
At a Glance
What It Does
Adds a new item in Section 1672(d) to authorize research and extension grants for SLF control, specifically to develop and disseminate research-based tools and treatments. It also updates the expiration window for high-priority R&E initiatives to 2030 in several subsections of Section 1672.
Who It Affects
Universities with extension programs, state departments of agriculture, and growers in SLF-affected regions stand to access new grant opportunities. Extension agents and pest-management researchers will be the primary implementers of the new tools and dissemination efforts.
Why It Matters
Elevating SLF control as a high-priority R&E focus aligns federal research funding with an urgent agricultural pest problem. Extending the program horizon to 2030 signals long-term commitment to developing and spreading effective management tools.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Spotted Lanternfly Research and Development Act would revise the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to categorize spotted lanternfly control research and development as a high-priority research and extension initiative. The bill creates a grants-based mechanism under Section 1672(d)(21) to fund the development and dissemination of research-based tools and treatments aimed at combating Lycorma delicatula.
In addition, it reauthorizes existing high-priority research and extension initiatives by updating several expiration dates from 2023 to 2030, thereby extending the timeline for federal support in this area. The overall aim is to ensure that leading research, extension services, and state agricultural programs have a continued and clearly prioritized pathway to generate practical solutions for SLF management and to get those solutions to growers and other affected stakeholders.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds Spotted Lanternfly control as a high-priority research and extension initiative under the FA Act of 1990.
It creates a new grants pathway (1672(d)(21)) to develop and disseminate research-based tools and treatments for SLF control.
Expiration dates for several high-priority R&E initiatives are moved from 2023 to 2030 across multiple subsections.
The measure would affect federal R&E programs administered under the FA Act, with downstream impacts on universities, extension services, and growers.
The policy focus is pest-specific, aiming to accelerate practical solutions and their adoption in SLF-affected agricultural sectors.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title and purpose
The act designates the formal title as the Spotted Lanternfly Research and Development Act. It sets the overall objective of elevating SLF control research and development within the federal agricultural research framework, signaling a targeted yet narrow policy focus on a specific pest.
Spotted Lanternfly control added to high-priority R&E
Section 1672(d) is amended to add the new paragraph (21): Spotted Lanternfly control—grant programs may be used to develop and disseminate research-based tools and treatments to combat Lycorma delicatula. This creates a formal grant-based mechanism for SLF R&D within the high-priority framework and positions SLF-related work alongside other priority research initiatives.
Reauthorization of high-priority R&E initiatives
The act updates expiration references across subsections (e)(5), (f)(5), (g)(1)(B), (g)(2)(B), (g)(3), and (h) from 2023 to 2030. This extends the policy window for continuing priority R&E programs and ensures SLF-related activities are considered within the extended horizon.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Agriculture across all five countries.
Explore Agriculture in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Land-grant universities and extension services gain a clear funding pathway to develop SLF-resistant practices and to train growers in new management tools.
- State departments of agriculture in SLF-affected regions (e.g., states with vineyards and tree-fruit production) gain capacity to coordinate SLF R&E grants and dissemination.
- Growers and producers affected by SLF (wine grape, fruit, and ornamental industries) benefit from access to research-based treatments and recommended practices.
- Pest management researchers and extension professionals receive structured funding to advance SLF control methods and education.
- USDA research agencies (e.g., ARS and related national networks) gain a formal mandate to allocate and coordinate SLF-focused R&E activities.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal program administrators and taxpayers face the annualized cost of supporting expanded R&E grants, subject to appropriations.
- State and local agencies may incur administrative overhead to administer SLF grants and align state programs with the federal framework.
- Universities and extension networks bear administrative and reporting requirements to manage SLF R&E grants and disseminate results.
- Private sector partners in pest-control tools may experience shifts in market dynamics as new tools and practices are promoted through federally funded channels.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether to allocate more federal R&E resources to a pest-specific problem now (to accelerate control) while preserving flexibility to address the wide range of agricultural research needs that also compete for funding.
The bill creates a targeted policy impulse—prioritizing SLF R&E within a broad federal research framework. While this can speed the development and dissemination of pest-control tools, it also concentrates scarce federal R&E resources on a single pest.
Implementation will hinge on annual appropriations levels, grant criteria, and the ability of universities and extension services to absorb new programs without diluting other priority initiatives. Coordination with existing SLF programs and other pest-management efforts will matter to avoid duplicate funding and to maximize the reach and adoption of effective tools.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.