The bill instructs the Secretary of Agriculture to conduct a national awareness campaign about the spotted lanternfly, an invasive insect that threatens a range of crops and trees. It specifically directs the Secretary to run public service announcements on television, radio, and billboards in high-incidence areas that (1) identify the insect as an invasive agricultural pest and (2) encourage people to kill any they encounter, and also authorizes the Secretary to use other outreach tools as appropriate.
This is a low-complexity federal intervention focused on public behavior rather than on inspections, quarantines, or direct control programs. For agricultural stakeholders and state agencies, the measure signals a federal push toward community-level suppression, but the text contains no appropriation, reporting, performance metrics, or enforcement mechanism — all of which matter for how effective and responsible a public “squish it” campaign can be in practice.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires the Secretary of Agriculture to carry out a national awareness campaign on spotted lanternflies. It mandates PSAs on television, radio, and billboards in high-incidence areas containing two core messages: that the insect is an invasive agricultural threat and that individuals should kill any they find, and gives the Secretary discretion to employ additional awareness tools.
Who It Affects
Primary audiences include growers (especially vineyards, orchards, and nurseries), state departments of agriculture, Cooperative Extension services, and the general public living in or traveling through high-incidence locations. USDA program staff and communications shops will be responsible for implementing the campaign.
Why It Matters
The bill shifts some pest management emphasis from institutional controls to public action, creating a federal role in urging individual behaviors. That approach can broaden detection and rapid response but also raises questions about scientific alignment, measurement of impact, funding, and potential unintended consequences of simple kill-on-sight messaging.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
At its core the bill is short and directive: it tells the Secretary of Agriculture to run a national campaign to raise public awareness about spotted lanternflies. The campaign must include public service announcements placed on television, radio, and billboards in geographies the Secretary deems to have high incidence of the pest.
Those messages must convey two points — that spotted lanternflies are an invasive pest that threaten local agriculture and that people should kill any they encounter — and the Secretary may supplement with other outreach methods.
Because the statute sets only output-level obligations (run a campaign; place PSAs in high-incidence areas), implementation details are left to USDA. That means the agency will decide how to define “high incidence,” which media markets to buy, what creative approaches to use, whether to partner with state ag agencies or extension services, and how to sequence outreach across regions.
The text does not appropriate funds, require coordination plans, ask for effectiveness metrics, or establish reporting or auditing obligations, so practical rollout will depend on existing USDA communications budgets and prioritization inside the department.Operationally, USDA could pursue conventional media buys, social media and digital ads, partnerships with state extension, signage at rest areas and truck stops, or outreach through industry groups. Measuring success will depend on choices the agency makes: it can track campaign reach and engagement, compare infestation survey data year‑over‑year in targeted zones, or solicit state reports on citizen reports and removals.
The absence of mandated performance standards leaves room for widely varying outcomes depending on how much agency leadership and funding the effort receives.The statute’s narrow focus on encouraging individuals to kill spotted lanternflies raises ancillary questions that managers will face during implementation: how to instruct the public to avoid misidentifying other species, whether to couple “kill” messaging with safe-handling guidance (to avoid injury or illegal pesticide use), and how to integrate public action with formal control strategies such as quarantines, inspections, and biological controls. Those choices will shape whether the campaign strengthens broader plant-health responses or simply produces high-visibility messaging with limited pest-suppression effect.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires the Secretary of Agriculture to carry out a national awareness campaign specifically addressing spotted lanternflies.
It mandates public service announcements on television, radio, and billboards placed in areas the Secretary identifies as having high incidence of the pest.
PSA messaging must include two components: that spotted lanternflies are invasive pests threatening local agriculture, and an explicit encouragement for individuals to kill any spotted lanternflies they encounter.
The Secretary is authorized to use other awareness tools 'as the Secretary determines appropriate' — the statute gives broad discretion over channels and tactics.
The text contains no appropriation, no schedule or deadlines for rollout, no required reporting or evaluation metrics, and no enforcement or liability provisions tied to the outreach.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Provides the Act’s name: the 'If You See It, Squish It Act of 2025.' This is purely stylistic but signals the law's public-facing emphasis on simple, actionable messaging rather than technical programmatic reform.
Core duty — national awareness campaign
Directs the Secretary of Agriculture to 'carry out a national campaign to increase awareness and knowledge' about spotted lanternflies. The language establishes a departmental obligation to undertake outreach at a national level while implicitly allowing targeting within that national effort; it creates a federal communications responsibility specific to this pest rather than creating regulatory controls or response programs.
Required PSA placements and message content
Specifies that the campaign must place public service announcements on television, radio, and billboards 'in areas of high incidence' and requires two message elements: (A) informing people that spotted lanternflies are an invasive agricultural threat, and (B) encouraging individuals to kill any spotted lanternflies they encounter. This provision prescribes placement channels and message themes but leaves terms like 'high incidence' and the precise wording of messages to administrative implementation.
Secretary discretion to use additional awareness tools
Grants the Secretary broad discretion to use 'such other awareness tools as the Secretary determines appropriate' to convey the same information. That catch-all gives USDA latitude to employ digital campaigns, partner with state agencies, use extension networks, post signage, or fund industry outreach — but it also means the statute imposes no minimum standards for coverage, evaluation, or methods.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Agriculture across all five countries.
Explore Agriculture in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Growers of high-value susceptible crops (vineyards, apple and stone fruit orchards, nurseries, and hardwood producers): the campaign aims to reduce population growth and damage through increased detection and localized removal, which could lower yield and management costs if public action supplements formal controls.
- State departments of agriculture and extension services in affected states: public awareness can increase citizen reporting and early detection, improving state surveillance without requiring proportional increases in state staffing.
- Local communities and recreation/tourism businesses in infested regions: reduced pest prevalence can protect landscape trees and visual assets that support tourism and local quality of life.
- USDA communications and outreach partners (industry groups, commodity councils): they may gain opportunities to co-brand messaging, expand membership engagement, and leverage federal content for local campaigns.
Who Bears the Cost
- USDA (Department of Agriculture): the agency must design and execute the campaign using existing communications resources unless Congress provides new funding; that can divert staff time and budget from other outreach priorities.
- Federal taxpayers: if USDA allocates new funds to the campaign, the cost will fall on appropriations; the bill itself does not specify funding sources.
- State and local agencies and nonprofit partners: although not mandated to act, these groups will likely be asked to coordinate, validate 'high incidence' designations, and support local messaging, creating potential operational and logistical burdens.
- Conservation and animal welfare advocates and naturalists: the encouraged kill-on-sight approach may create conflicts and demand additional outreach to prevent misidentification or non-target impacts, imposing advocacy and education costs on these stakeholders.
- Private landowners and outdoor workers: the law shifts some onus for pest suppression onto individuals who may incur time costs, face safety risks if advised to handle insects directly, or need training to distinguish species.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether a simple, widely understood 'see it, squish it' message—easy to communicate and likely to mobilize quick public action—will produce meaningful suppression of an agricultural pest without creating misidentification harms, unsafe practices, or a diversion of resources from scientifically driven, coordinated control programs that address the root causes of spread.
The statute prescribes a blunt behavioral message — kill spotted lanternflies on sight — while leaving almost every implementation detail to USDA. That combination creates three practical tensions: (1) the potential gap between simple public-facing messaging and integrated pest management best practices, (2) funding and prioritization uncertainty because the bill does not appropriate money or require reporting, and (3) the risk of unintended harms from misidentification or unsafe control methods.
A campaign that tells people to 'squish' insects without guidance on safe handling, species ID, or alternatives may prompt improper pesticide use, injury, or killing of non-target species. Further, without metrics or reporting requirements, Congress and stakeholders will have limited ability to determine whether the campaign reduces infestation rates or merely raises awareness.
The text's reliance on the Secretary's discretion to define 'areas of high incidence' and to choose additional awareness tools creates another implementation challenge: inconsistent geographic targeting could result in media buys that miss vulnerable populations (e.g., seasonal farmworkers, non-English speakers) or that waste resources in markets where on-the-ground presence is minimal. Finally, the law pivots responsibility toward individual action rather than strengthening structural controls (inspection, quarantine enforcement, research into biological control), raising a policy choice about whether behavioral nudges are meant to supplement or substitute for institutional pest control investments.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.