The Restoring Essential Healthcare Act targets a narrow, technical constraint in existing law by repealing the prohibition on Medicaid payments to certain entities. Specifically, it repeals Section 71113 of Public Law 119–21 and directs that payments for items or services furnished as medical assistance under a State plan (or a waiver of such plan) by a prohibited entity should be paid as if Section 71113 had not been enacted.
The repeal is limited to the period beginning on the date of enactment of Public Law 119–21 and ending on the date of enactment of this section. In effect, the bill restores the prior payment flow to those entities for Medicaid services, without creating new authorities beyond reversing the existing prohibition.
At a Glance
What It Does
The act repeals Section 71113 of Public Law 119–21, removing the Medicaid payment prohibition for certain entities. For items and services delivered under a State plan or Title XIX waivers by a prohibited entity during the specified window, payments are to be made as if the prohibition had never been enacted.
Who It Affects
State Medicaid agencies administering Title XIX programs through state plans or waivers, providers designated as prohibited entities under 71113, and Medicaid beneficiaries who receive services from those providers.
Why It Matters
By restoring Medicaid payment flows to entities previously barred, the bill could affect access to care, provider networks, and state-level budgeting. The change also raises considerations about program integrity, oversight, and the fiscal footprint of restored payments.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Restoring Essential Healthcare Act repeals a prohibition that prevented Medicaid payments to certain entities. By repealing Section 71113 of Public Law 119–21, the bill allows payments to those entities for items and services that qualify as medical assistance under a state’s plan or its waivers, but only for the period between the enactment of Public Law 119–21 and the enactment of this section.
In practical terms, Medicaid payments that were previously barred can proceed as if the prohibition never existed, restoring the pre-119–21 payment dynamic for those providers.
This change is narrowly scoped to Medicaid payments and does not expand other authorities or programs. It applies to items and services furnished under Title XIX and references the same definition of a “prohibited entity” as in subsection (b)(1) of Section 71113.
States implementing Medicaid programs under plans or waivers will be responsible for operationalizing the repeal within their payment processes and compliance regimes. While the policy intent is to restore access to care by reconnecting providers with Medicaid payment streams, the bill itself does not prescribe new coverage decisions, service levels, or eligibility criteria beyond reversing the restriction on payments.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill repeals Section 71113 of Public Law 119–21, removing the Medicaid payment prohibition for specified entities.
Payments for items and services furnished by a prohibited entity during the window from Public Law 119–21's enactment to this act's enactment are payable as if the prohibition had not been enacted.
The repeal applies to medical assistance under State plans or waivers (Title XIX) provided by a prohibited entity.
The definition of 'prohibited entity' remains the same as in 71113(b)(1).
The effective and operational period begins at enactment of this section and is prospective from that point.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
This section provides the bill’s official title, the Restoring Essential Healthcare Act, for citation and reference in subsequent law and administration. It anchors the amendment to a named policy objective and signals the legislative intent to restore Medicaid payment flexibility to certain providers.
Repeal of Medicaid Payment Prohibition for Certain Entities
Section 2 repeals Section 71113 of Public Law 119–21, which previously barred Medicaid payments to a defined set of entities. The repeal requires Medicaid payments for items and services furnished as medical assistance under a State plan (or a waiver) by a prohibited entity during the period beginning on the date of enactment of Public Law 119–21 and ending on the date of enactment of this section, to be paid as if the prohibition had not been enacted. This clean reversal restores the pre‑119–21 payment dynamic for these providers, shifting fiscal and administrative considerations back toward the former framework.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- State Medicaid agencies gain flexibility to reimburse providers previously barred under 71113, smoothing cash flow and preserving access to care for patients who rely on those providers.
- Hospitals and clinics formerly designated as prohibited entities can receive Medicaid payments again for eligible items and services, preserving existing care networks.
- Medicaid enrollees who depend on services from the affected providers retain access to care without disruptions caused by payment gaps.
- Integrated health systems with relationships to the previously prohibited providers may experience continuity in revenue and service delivery.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal government (CMS) may face higher Medicaid outlays due to resumed payments, affecting the overall cost of the program.
- State Medicaid programs could see increased state share and administrative burden as they adjust to restored payment flows and ensure compliance.
- Prohibited entities, now eligible again for Medicaid payments, may incur heightened scrutiny and ongoing compliance costs to meet program integrity standards.
- Program integrity and anti-fraud enforcement efforts may need to scale to address renewed payments and verify appropriate use of funds.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing immediate access to care provided by entities previously restricted with the need to maintain stringent payment integrity controls and cost containment in the Medicaid program.
The repeal creates policy tensions around access versus program integrity. Restoring payments to entities previously barred could improve care availability, but it also reopens opportunities for improper payments if safeguards are not adequately enforced.
States and the federal program will need to align on implementation timelines, clarify the definition and scope of 'prohibited entity' under Section 71113, and establish processes for retroactive or transitional reimbursements during the window between 119–21’s enactment and this act’s enactment. While the bill states payments should be made as if the prohibition had not been enacted, it does not detail new or enhanced oversight provisions, leaving questions about how existing fraud and abuse controls will apply to these now-eligible payments.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.