The Restoring Essential Healthcare Act repeals the prohibition on Medicaid payments to certain entities defined in Section 71113 of Public Law 119–21. It instructs that, for items or services furnished as medical assistance under a State plan (or a waiver) by a prohibited entity during the period beginning on the date of enactment of Public Law 119–21 and ending on the date of enactment of this section, payment shall be made as if that section 71113 had not been enacted.
In effect, the bill restores the Medicaid reimbursement pathway to providers previously barred by the 119–21 prohibition, aligning payments with pre‑119–21 practice and ensuring continued access to care where these entities operate.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill repeals Section 71113 of Public Law 119–21, restoring the Medicaid payment mechanism for items and services furnished by prohibited entities under State plans or waivers (Title XIX). It sets retroactive payment treatment for a defined transitional period and clarifies that the prohibition is no longer in force for those payments.
Who It Affects
State Medicaid agencies, Medicaid providers previously designated as prohibited entities, and the Medicaid enrollees who rely on those providers.
Why It Matters
Restoring reimbursements preserves provider networks and access to care for beneficiaries while clarifying funding flows within the Medicaid program.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Restoring Essential Healthcare Act repeals a barrier that blocked Medicaid payments to certain providers under Public Law 119–21. By repealing Section 71113, the bill returns the program to allowing payments to those providers for medical items and services delivered under state plans or waivers.
The retroactive language means that, for the period between the enactment of Public Law 119–21 and the date this bill becomes law, payments to those providers should be made as though the prohibition had never existed. The net effect is a restoration of Medicaid payment eligibility for the entities described in the repealed prohibition, with the remainder of Medicaid rules and program integrity provisions staying in place.
The bill does not alter other aspects of Medicaid beyond reinstating the payment pathway for these entities, but it does raise questions about funding, administration, and oversight given the renewed reimbursements.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill repeals the prohibition on Medicaid payments to prohibited entities under Public Law 119–21.
Retroactive payment language applies to items/services furnished under State plans or waivers during the transitional period.
Payments are restored for the entities defined as prohibited in section 71113.
The change affects how Medicaid reimburses providers, not the underlying eligibility rules.
No other Medicaid program changes are proposed in this bill.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
Section 1 designates the act’s short title as the Restoring Essential Healthcare Act. It establishes the bill’s identity but does not by itself alter program terms beyond enabling the repeal in Section 2.
Repeal of Prohibition on Medicaid Payments to Certain Entities
Section 2 repeals Section 71113 of Public Law 119–21. For items and services furnished as medical assistance under a State plan (or waivers) by a prohibited entity during the period from the enactment of Public Law 119–21 to the enactment of this Act, payments shall be made as if Section 71113 had not been enacted. The provision ties the retroactive payment treatment to the existing Title XIX framework (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.), ensuring continuity of reimbursement for affected providers under the Medicaid program.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Prohibited-entity healthcare providers who will regain Medicaid reimbursement eligibility for items and services they furnish.
- Medicaid enrollees who rely on care from these providers, reducing potential access gaps.
- State Medicaid agencies that administer Title XIX programs, benefitting from restored payment authority and network stability.
- Medicaid managed care organizations and providers that rely on robust networks and predictable reimbursements.
Who Bears the Cost
- State Medicaid programs, which may face higher overall outlays due to restored reimbursements.
- Federal government’s Medicaid funding (FMAP) potentially increasing with higher matching funds driven by increased payments.
- Administrative costs for states and the federal government to implement retroactive payments and adjust payment systems and reporting.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing expanded access and continuity of care against the risk of higher Medicaid expenditures and potential manipulation of reimbursements without additional safeguards.
The bill’s main tension is economic and policy: restoring reimbursements to providers defined as prohibited under 119–21 can improve patient access and network resilience but raises questions about the cost to state budgets and federal funding, as well as program integrity. Because Section 71113’s prohibition was in place, many providers may have operated under a different reimbursement expectation; reinstating payments could necessitate retroactive processing and budget adjustments.
There is also limited detail in the bill about how the prohibited-entity definition is verified in practice, how retroactive claims will be funded, and what guardrails will apply to prevent abuse or fraud in the restored payments.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.